Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab as chronic cluster headache preventive treatment under real world conditions: Observational prospective study.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Raquel Lamas Pérez, Manuel Millán-Vázquez, Carmen González-Oria
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab as chronic cluster headache preventive treatment under real world conditions: Observational prospective study.","authors":"Raquel Lamas Pérez, Manuel Millán-Vázquez, Carmen González-Oria","doi":"10.1177/03331024231226181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Calcitonin gene-related peptide has shown to play a central role in cluster headache (CH) pathophysiology. A clinical trial with galcanezumab was carried out in chronic cluster headache (CCH) but did not meet its primay endpoint. However, its off-label use in patients with CCH refractory to other therapies could be considered. We aimed to asses the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab as CCH preventive treatment in a real-life setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study was conducted. Patients with CCH who received at least one dose of 240 mg of galcanezumab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one patients who tried a mean of 6.3 ± 1.9 preventive therapies, including onabotulinumtoxinA in 90.5%. At baseline, the median of frequency was 60 (37.5-105) monthly attacks with 10 (8.3-10) points in pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale). After one month, the frequency decreased to 31 (10.5-45) (<i>p</i> = 0.003) with 8.5 (8-9.5) intensity (<i>p</i> = 0.007); 10 (47.6%) patients were 50% responders of whom four (19%) were 75% responders. Of the 15 patients with 3 months of follow-up, seven (46.6%) reduced their frequency by 50% and four (26.6%) by 75%, with 40 (10-60) monthly attacks (<i>p</i> = 0.07) and pain intensity of 8 (5-10) (<i>p</i> = 0.026). Some 52% patients experienced adverse events, mostly mild.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort of refractory CCH, galcanezumab was effective in almost 50% of patients. This finding supports individual off-label treatment attempts.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"44 3","pages":"3331024231226181"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024231226181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Calcitonin gene-related peptide has shown to play a central role in cluster headache (CH) pathophysiology. A clinical trial with galcanezumab was carried out in chronic cluster headache (CCH) but did not meet its primay endpoint. However, its off-label use in patients with CCH refractory to other therapies could be considered. We aimed to asses the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab as CCH preventive treatment in a real-life setting.

Methods: An observational study was conducted. Patients with CCH who received at least one dose of 240 mg of galcanezumab.

Results: Twenty-one patients who tried a mean of 6.3 ± 1.9 preventive therapies, including onabotulinumtoxinA in 90.5%. At baseline, the median of frequency was 60 (37.5-105) monthly attacks with 10 (8.3-10) points in pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale). After one month, the frequency decreased to 31 (10.5-45) (p = 0.003) with 8.5 (8-9.5) intensity (p = 0.007); 10 (47.6%) patients were 50% responders of whom four (19%) were 75% responders. Of the 15 patients with 3 months of follow-up, seven (46.6%) reduced their frequency by 50% and four (26.6%) by 75%, with 40 (10-60) monthly attacks (p = 0.07) and pain intensity of 8 (5-10) (p = 0.026). Some 52% patients experienced adverse events, mostly mild.

Conclusions: In our cohort of refractory CCH, galcanezumab was effective in almost 50% of patients. This finding supports individual off-label treatment attempts.

现实条件下加坎珠单抗作为慢性丛集性头痛预防治疗的有效性和安全性:前瞻性观察研究。
背景:降钙素基因相关肽已被证明在丛集性头痛(CH)病理生理学中起着核心作用。一项针对慢性丛集性头痛(CCH)的临床试验使用了 galcanezumab,但未达到主要终点。不过,可以考虑将其用于其他疗法难治的慢性丛集性头痛患者的标签外治疗。我们的目的是在现实生活中评估加仑珠单抗作为慢性丛集性头痛预防治疗的有效性和安全性:方法:我们开展了一项观察性研究。结果:21 名 CCH 患者试用了平均 240 毫克的 galcanezumab:21名患者平均尝试了6.3±1.9种预防疗法,其中90.5%的患者使用了阿糖胞苷。基线时,每月发作频率的中位数为 60(37.5-105)次,疼痛强度(数字评分量表)为 10(8.3-10)分。一个月后,发作频率降至 31(10.5-45)次(p = 0.003),疼痛强度为 8.5(8-9.5)分(p = 0.007);10 名患者(47.6%)的应答率为 50%,其中 4 名患者(19%)的应答率为 75%。在随访 3 个月的 15 名患者中,7 人(46.6%)的发病频率降低了 50%,4 人(26.6%)降低了 75%,每月发病次数为 40 次(10-60 次)(p = 0.07),疼痛强度为 8 次(5-10 次)(p = 0.026)。约52%的患者出现了不良反应,多数为轻度:结论:在我们的难治性慢性阻塞性肺疾病队列中,加卡尼珠单抗对近50%的患者有效。结论:在我们的一组难治性 CCH 患者中,加尼单抗对近 50% 的患者有效,这一结果支持了个别标示外治疗尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信