Flock health planning: How to move from a plan to a reflective planning process in Northern Irish sheep flocks?

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Paul E. Crawford, Kim Hamer, Fiona Lovatt, Malgorzata C. Behnke, Philip A. Robinson
{"title":"Flock health planning: How to move from a plan to a reflective planning process in Northern Irish sheep flocks?","authors":"Paul E. Crawford,&nbsp;Kim Hamer,&nbsp;Fiona Lovatt,&nbsp;Malgorzata C. Behnke,&nbsp;Philip A. Robinson","doi":"10.1111/aab.12907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flock health planning has been advocated as part of a wider drive within livestock production for veterinarians and farmers to adopt a prevention-focused approach to veterinary medicine. This approach has, at its core, a cyclical process of assessment, evaluation, action and re-assessment, and is documented, at least in summary, in a health plan (HP). The HP has become a defining pillar of farm quality assurance schemes (QASs), introduced to address calls for greater transparency and accountability in food production. There is limited current information on the attitudes and behaviours surrounding flock HPs in the sheep sector and the barriers to greater involvement in an active process of continual improvement through reflective flock health planning. This study aims to address these issues with reference to the national flock in Northern Ireland. A mixed-methods approach was used to explore farmers' and veterinarians' opinions and behaviours related to QASs and HP, with data obtained through an online scoping questionnaire, semi-structured interviews with 27 farmers and 15 veterinarians, and discussion groups with farmers and veterinarians. No evidence of a positive association between a farm having a HP and implementation of 12 industry-recommended flock health activities was identified using the Fisher's exact test. Farmers reported a reluctance to pay for veterinary advice while some veterinarians reported a lack of time to develop HPs for farmers, and sheep-related work generally. Farmers predominantly saw the HP as a static, physical document, which had limited impact on their management practices, rather than a proactive, reflective and collaborative planning process. Veterinarians tasked with completing HPs felt restricted by limited knowledge of on-farm practices, flock production data and a lack of confidence in the accuracy of on-farm medicine records. This led some to believe that the HPs may fail to address critical issues. A new approach to engage farmers and veterinarians together in active flock health planning needs to be developed. This will need a sustainable delivery plan. Then the focus can be shifted towards ongoing reflective health planning to drive change for the betterment of sheep health and welfare.</p>","PeriodicalId":7977,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Biology","volume":"184 3","pages":"339-351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aab.12907","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Applied Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aab.12907","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flock health planning has been advocated as part of a wider drive within livestock production for veterinarians and farmers to adopt a prevention-focused approach to veterinary medicine. This approach has, at its core, a cyclical process of assessment, evaluation, action and re-assessment, and is documented, at least in summary, in a health plan (HP). The HP has become a defining pillar of farm quality assurance schemes (QASs), introduced to address calls for greater transparency and accountability in food production. There is limited current information on the attitudes and behaviours surrounding flock HPs in the sheep sector and the barriers to greater involvement in an active process of continual improvement through reflective flock health planning. This study aims to address these issues with reference to the national flock in Northern Ireland. A mixed-methods approach was used to explore farmers' and veterinarians' opinions and behaviours related to QASs and HP, with data obtained through an online scoping questionnaire, semi-structured interviews with 27 farmers and 15 veterinarians, and discussion groups with farmers and veterinarians. No evidence of a positive association between a farm having a HP and implementation of 12 industry-recommended flock health activities was identified using the Fisher's exact test. Farmers reported a reluctance to pay for veterinary advice while some veterinarians reported a lack of time to develop HPs for farmers, and sheep-related work generally. Farmers predominantly saw the HP as a static, physical document, which had limited impact on their management practices, rather than a proactive, reflective and collaborative planning process. Veterinarians tasked with completing HPs felt restricted by limited knowledge of on-farm practices, flock production data and a lack of confidence in the accuracy of on-farm medicine records. This led some to believe that the HPs may fail to address critical issues. A new approach to engage farmers and veterinarians together in active flock health planning needs to be developed. This will need a sustainable delivery plan. Then the focus can be shifted towards ongoing reflective health planning to drive change for the betterment of sheep health and welfare.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

羊群健康规划:爱尔兰北部羊群如何从计划转变为反思性规划过程?
在畜牧业生产中,兽医和养殖户都在广泛推动采用以预防为主的兽医方法,鸡群健康规划就是其中的一部分。这种方法的核心是评估、评价、行动和再评估的循环过程,并至少简要地记录在健康计划(HP)中。健康计划已成为农场质量保证计划(QASs)的决定性支柱,引入该计划是为了响应提高食品生产透明度和问责制的呼吁。目前,有关养羊业对羊群健康计划的态度和行为,以及通过反思性羊群健康计划积极参与持续改进过程的障碍的信息十分有限。本研究以北爱尔兰全国羊群为对象,旨在解决这些问题。研究采用了一种混合方法,通过在线范围调查问卷、对 27 位养殖户和 15 位兽医的半结构化访谈以及与养殖户和兽医的讨论小组获得的数据,探讨了养殖户和兽医与 QAS 和 HP 相关的观点和行为。通过费雪精确检验,没有证据表明拥有HP的农场与实施行业推荐的12项鸡群健康活动之间存在正相关。养殖户表示不愿意为兽医咨询付费,而一些兽医则表示没有时间为养殖户制定健康计划,也没有时间开展与羊相关的工作。牧场主主要将HP视为静态的、有形的文件,对他们的管理实践影响有限,而不是一个积极主动、反思和协作的规划过程。由于对农场实践、羊群生产数据的了解有限,以及对农场用药记录的准确性缺乏信心,负责完成HP的兽医感到受到了限制。这导致一些人认为,HPs 可能无法解决关键问题。需要制定一种新方法,让养殖户和兽医共同参与积极的鸡群健康规划。这需要一个可持续的实施计划。然后,可以将重点转向持续的反思性健康规划,以推动变革,改善羊群的健康和福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Applied Biology
Annals of Applied Biology 生物-农业综合
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Applied Biology is an international journal sponsored by the Association of Applied Biologists. The journal publishes original research papers on all aspects of applied research on crop production, crop protection and the cropping ecosystem. The journal is published both online and in six printed issues per year. Annals papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge and may, among others, encompass the scientific disciplines of: Agronomy Agrometeorology Agrienvironmental sciences Applied genomics Applied metabolomics Applied proteomics Biodiversity Biological control Climate change Crop ecology Entomology Genetic manipulation Molecular biology Mycology Nematology Pests Plant pathology Plant breeding & genetics Plant physiology Post harvest biology Soil science Statistics Virology Weed biology Annals also welcomes reviews of interest in these subject areas. Reviews should be critical surveys of the field and offer new insights. All papers are subject to peer review. Papers must usually contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge in applied biology but short papers discussing techniques or substantiated results, and reviews of current knowledge of interest to applied biologists will be considered for publication. Papers or reviews must not be offered to any other journal for prior or simultaneous publication and normally average seven printed pages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信