The interaction of the structure-directing agent with the zeolite framework determines germanium distribution in SCM-15 germanosilicate

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Stoyan P. Gramatikov, Petko St. Petkov, Zhendong Wang, Weimin Yang, Georgi N. Vayssilov
{"title":"The interaction of the structure-directing agent with the zeolite framework determines germanium distribution in SCM-15 germanosilicate","authors":"Stoyan P. Gramatikov,&nbsp;Petko St. Petkov,&nbsp;Zhendong Wang,&nbsp;Weimin Yang,&nbsp;Georgi N. Vayssilov","doi":"10.1007/s11705-024-2417-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We report results from computational modeling of the relative stability of germanosilicate SCM-15 structure due to different distribution of germanium heteroatoms in the double four-member rings (D4Rs) of the framework and the orientation of the structure directing agent (SDA) molecules in the as-synthesized zeolite. The calculated relative energies of the bare zeolite framework suggest that structures with germanium ions clustered in the same D4Rs, e.g., with large number of Ge–O–Ge contacts, are the most stable. The simulations of various orientations of the SDA in the pores of the germanosilicate zeolite show different stability order—the most stable models are the structures with germanium spread among all D4Rs. Thus, for SCM-15 the stabilization due to the presence of the SDA and their orientation, is thermodynamic factor directing both the formation of specific framework type and Ge distribution in the framework during the synthesis. The relative stability of bare structures with different germanium distribution is of minor importance. This differs from SCM-14 germanosilicate, reported earlier, for which the stability order is preserved in presence of SDA. Thus, even for zeolites with the same chemical composition and SDA, the characteristics of their framework lead to different energetic preference for germanium distribution.</p><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":571,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering","volume":"18 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11705-024-2417-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We report results from computational modeling of the relative stability of germanosilicate SCM-15 structure due to different distribution of germanium heteroatoms in the double four-member rings (D4Rs) of the framework and the orientation of the structure directing agent (SDA) molecules in the as-synthesized zeolite. The calculated relative energies of the bare zeolite framework suggest that structures with germanium ions clustered in the same D4Rs, e.g., with large number of Ge–O–Ge contacts, are the most stable. The simulations of various orientations of the SDA in the pores of the germanosilicate zeolite show different stability order—the most stable models are the structures with germanium spread among all D4Rs. Thus, for SCM-15 the stabilization due to the presence of the SDA and their orientation, is thermodynamic factor directing both the formation of specific framework type and Ge distribution in the framework during the synthesis. The relative stability of bare structures with different germanium distribution is of minor importance. This differs from SCM-14 germanosilicate, reported earlier, for which the stability order is preserved in presence of SDA. Thus, even for zeolites with the same chemical composition and SDA, the characteristics of their framework lead to different energetic preference for germanium distribution.

Abstract Image

结构引导剂与沸石框架的相互作用决定了锗在 SCM-15 锗硅酸盐中的分布
我们报告了对锗硅酸盐 SCM-15 结构的相对稳定性进行计算建模的结果,这种相对稳定性是由于锗杂原子在框架的双四元环(D4R)中的不同分布以及结构引导剂(SDA)分子在合成沸石中的取向造成的。裸沸石框架的计算相对能量表明,锗离子聚集在同一 D4Rs 中的结构(例如,具有大量 Ge-O-Ge 接触的结构)最为稳定。对 SDA 在锗硅酸盐沸石孔隙中的不同取向进行的模拟显示出不同的稳定性顺序--最稳定的模型是锗分布在所有 D4R 中的结构。因此,对于 SCM-15 而言,SDA 的存在及其取向所导致的稳定性是一个热力学因素,在合成过程中对特定框架类型的形成和框架中 Ge 的分布都起着指导作用。具有不同锗分布的裸结构的相对稳定性并不重要。这与早先报道的 SCM-14 锗硅酸盐不同,后者的稳定性顺序在 SDA 的存在下得以保持。因此,即使化学成分和 SDA 相同的沸石,其框架的特性也会导致锗分布的能量偏好不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
868
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering presents the latest developments in chemical science and engineering, emphasizing emerging and multidisciplinary fields and international trends in research and development. The journal promotes communication and exchange between scientists all over the world. The contents include original reviews, research papers and short communications. Coverage includes catalysis and reaction engineering, clean energy, functional material, nanotechnology and nanoscience, biomaterials and biotechnology, particle technology and multiphase processing, separation science and technology, sustainable technologies and green processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信