A probabilistic modal logic for context-aware trust based on evidence

IF 3.2 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Alessandro Aldini , Gianluca Curzi , Pierluigi Graziani , Mirko Tagliaferri
{"title":"A probabilistic modal logic for context-aware trust based on evidence","authors":"Alessandro Aldini ,&nbsp;Gianluca Curzi ,&nbsp;Pierluigi Graziani ,&nbsp;Mirko Tagliaferri","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2024.109167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Trust is an extremely helpful construct when reasoning under uncertainty. Thus, being able to logically formalize the concept in a suitable language is important. However, doing so is problematic for three reasons. First, in order to keep track of the contextual nature of trust, situation trackers are required inside the language. Second, in order to produce trust estimations, agents rely on evidence personally gathered or reported by other agents; this requires elements in the language that can track which agents are used as referrals and how much weight is placed on their opinions. Finally, trust is subjective in nature, thus, personal thresholds are needed to track the trust-propensity of different evaluators. In this paper we propose an interpretation of a probabilistic modal language à la Hennessy-Milner in order to capture a context-aware quantitative notion of trust based on evidence. We also provide an axiomatization for the language and prove soundness, completeness, and decidability results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 109167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X24000549/pdfft?md5=4f8df3737451f342a0bf6a2d5024f1b9&pid=1-s2.0-S0888613X24000549-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X24000549","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trust is an extremely helpful construct when reasoning under uncertainty. Thus, being able to logically formalize the concept in a suitable language is important. However, doing so is problematic for three reasons. First, in order to keep track of the contextual nature of trust, situation trackers are required inside the language. Second, in order to produce trust estimations, agents rely on evidence personally gathered or reported by other agents; this requires elements in the language that can track which agents are used as referrals and how much weight is placed on their opinions. Finally, trust is subjective in nature, thus, personal thresholds are needed to track the trust-propensity of different evaluators. In this paper we propose an interpretation of a probabilistic modal language à la Hennessy-Milner in order to capture a context-aware quantitative notion of trust based on evidence. We also provide an axiomatization for the language and prove soundness, completeness, and decidability results.

基于证据的情境感知信任概率模态逻辑
在不确定情况下进行推理时,信任是一个非常有用的概念。因此,用合适的语言将这一概念逻辑地形式化是非常重要的。然而,这样做却存在问题,原因有三。首先,为了跟踪信任的上下文性质,需要在语言中加入情况跟踪器。其次,为了得出信任估计值,代理要依赖于个人收集的证据或其他代理的报告;这就需要在语言中加入一些元素,以跟踪哪些代理被用作推荐人,以及他们的意见所占的权重有多大。最后,信任具有主观性,因此需要个人阈值来跟踪不同评估者的信任倾向。在本文中,我们提出了一种类似于 Hennessy-Milner 的概率模态语言解释,以捕捉基于证据的上下文感知定量信任概念。我们还提供了该语言的公理化,并证明了其合理性、完备性和可判定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
170
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Approximate Reasoning is intended to serve as a forum for the treatment of imprecision and uncertainty in Artificial and Computational Intelligence, covering both the foundations of uncertainty theories, and the design of intelligent systems for scientific and engineering applications. It publishes high-quality research papers describing theoretical developments or innovative applications, as well as review articles on topics of general interest. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, probabilistic reasoning and Bayesian networks, imprecise probabilities, random sets, belief functions (Dempster-Shafer theory), possibility theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, decision theory, non-additive measures and integrals, qualitative reasoning about uncertainty, comparative probability orderings, game-theoretic probability, default reasoning, nonstandard logics, argumentation systems, inconsistency tolerant reasoning, elicitation techniques, philosophical foundations and psychological models of uncertain reasoning. Domains of application for uncertain reasoning systems include risk analysis and assessment, information retrieval and database design, information fusion, machine learning, data and web mining, computer vision, image and signal processing, intelligent data analysis, statistics, multi-agent systems, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信