Beyond (and Alongside) Shameful Attachments: The Lived Experience of Critique Within the Entrepreneurial University

IF 0.9 4区社会学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES

Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1177/15327086241236226

Daniel Leyton, Gustavo Sánchez

引用次数: 0

Abstract

During 2019, we embarked on a fieldwork based on 18 semi-structured interviews with international scholars in the humanities and social sciences in Chilean universities to explore their experiences with knowledge. Drawing on theories of critique and neoliberalism, we analyzed their ambivalent and unsettling conjunction of attachments to neoliberal and critical knowledge formations. By developing the notion of regime of epistemic subjectification, we emphasized the affective intensities these experiences brought to bear amid the differential weight and interplay of neoliberalism and critique as ethico-epistemic modes of engagement. We argued that the dominant focus on neoliberal knowledge and entrepreneurial subjectivity, albeit intense, expansive, and seemingly omnipresent, must be complicated by exposing its ambivalent affective and somatic force, and recognizing the difference between critical academic products and the lived experience of critique. The latter was constituted in the outsides of the inside of the neoliberal knowledge regime.

查看原文本刊更多论文

超越（和并肩）可耻的依附：创业型大学内部批评的生活体验

2019年期间，我们对智利大学人文和社会科学领域的国际学者进行了18次半结构式访谈，以探索他们的知识经验。我们以批判和新自由主义理论为基础，分析了他们对新自由主义和批判性知识形态的矛盾和不安。通过发展认识主体化制度的概念，我们强调了这些经历在新自由主义和批判作为伦理-认识模式的参与的不同分量和相互作用中带来的情感强度。我们认为，对新自由主义知识和企业家主体性的主导关注，尽管是强烈的、扩张的和似乎无处不在的，但必须通过揭示其矛盾的情感和躯体力量，并认识到批判性学术产品与批判的生活体验之间的差异，使之复杂化。后者是在新自由主义知识体系内部的外部构成的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies Multiple-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The mandate for this interdisciplinary, international journal is to move methods talk in cultural studies to the forefront, into the regions of moral, ethical and political discourse. The commitment to imagine a more democratic society has been sa guiding feature of cultural studies from the very beginnnig. Contributors to this journal understand that the discourses of a critical, moral methodology are basic to any effort to re-engage the promise of the social sciences and the humanities for democracy in the 21st Century. We seek works that connect critical emanicipatory theories to new forms of social justice and democratic practice are encouraged.