{"title":"Quantitative prediction of CYP3A induction-mediated drug-drug interactions in clinical practice","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dmpk.2024.101010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There have been no reports on the quantitative prediction of CYP3A induction-mediated decreases in AUC and <em>C</em><sub>max</sub> for drug candidates identified as a “victims” of CYP3A induction. Our previous study separately evaluated the fold-induction of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A by known inducers using clinical induction data and revealed that we were able to quantitatively predict the AUC ratio (AUCR) of a few CYP3A substrates in the presence and absence of CYP3A inducers. In the present study, we investigate the predictability of AUCR and also <em>C</em><sub>max</sub> ratio (C<sub>max</sub>R) in additional 54 clinical studies. The fraction metabolized by CYP3A (<em>f</em><sub>m</sub>), the intestinal bioavailability (<em>F</em><sub>g</sub>), and the hepatic intrinsic clearance (<em>CL</em><sub>int</sub>) of substrates were determined by the in vitro experiments as well as clinical data used for calculating AUCR and C<sub>max</sub>R. The result showed that 65–69% and 65–67% of predictions were within 2-fold of observed AUCR and C<sub>max</sub>R, respectively. A simulation using multiple parameter combinations suggested that the variability of <em>f</em><sub>m</sub> and <em>F</em><sub>g</sub> within a certain range might have a minimal impact on the calculation output. These findings suggest that clinical AUCR and C<sub>max</sub>R of CYP3A substrates can be quantitatively predicted from the preclinical stage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11298,"journal":{"name":"Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101010"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1347436724000168/pdfft?md5=05af9e2101d932059de43ff8740db672&pid=1-s2.0-S1347436724000168-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1347436724000168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There have been no reports on the quantitative prediction of CYP3A induction-mediated decreases in AUC and Cmax for drug candidates identified as a “victims” of CYP3A induction. Our previous study separately evaluated the fold-induction of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A by known inducers using clinical induction data and revealed that we were able to quantitatively predict the AUC ratio (AUCR) of a few CYP3A substrates in the presence and absence of CYP3A inducers. In the present study, we investigate the predictability of AUCR and also Cmax ratio (CmaxR) in additional 54 clinical studies. The fraction metabolized by CYP3A (fm), the intestinal bioavailability (Fg), and the hepatic intrinsic clearance (CLint) of substrates were determined by the in vitro experiments as well as clinical data used for calculating AUCR and CmaxR. The result showed that 65–69% and 65–67% of predictions were within 2-fold of observed AUCR and CmaxR, respectively. A simulation using multiple parameter combinations suggested that the variability of fm and Fg within a certain range might have a minimal impact on the calculation output. These findings suggest that clinical AUCR and CmaxR of CYP3A substrates can be quantitatively predicted from the preclinical stage.
期刊介绍:
DMPK publishes original and innovative scientific papers that address topics broadly related to xenobiotics. The term xenobiotic includes medicinal as well as environmental and agricultural chemicals and macromolecules. The journal is organized into sections as follows:
- Drug metabolism / Biotransformation
- Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- Toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics
- Drug-drug interaction / Drug-food interaction
- Mechanism of drug absorption and disposition (including transporter)
- Drug delivery system
- Clinical pharmacy and pharmacology
- Analytical method
- Factors affecting drug metabolism and transport
- Expression of genes for drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters
- Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics
- Pharmacoepidemiology.