Habilidades técnicas en suturas evaluadas con OSATS, comparando diferentes métodos de instrucción y acompañamiento

Q2 Social Sciences
Marcela Velásquez-Salazar , María Helena Gaitán-Buitrago , Diego Alexander Becerra-Cardona
{"title":"Habilidades técnicas en suturas evaluadas con OSATS, comparando diferentes métodos de instrucción y acompañamiento","authors":"Marcela Velásquez-Salazar ,&nbsp;María Helena Gaitán-Buitrago ,&nbsp;Diego Alexander Becerra-Cardona","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2024.100904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Training students in non-clinical scenarios is necessary to prepare them for their encounters with patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An experimental prospective cohort research was conducted, with undergraduate students who performed a pretest, with previous theoretical instruction, then they were randomized into 3 groups, group 1 was accompanied by a surgeon, group 2 was accompanied by scrub nurse and group 3 practiced with videos. Subsequently, they performed a post-test, which was reviewed asyncronically by another surgeon, applying OSATS. In addition, students conducted surveys about their confidence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>59 students participated, in the pretest the students behaved homogeneously. In the post-test, there was statistically significant improvement in all groups (p&lt;0.001), with no differences between groups. Confidence in unsupervised suturing, instrument handling, and anxiety improved in all students at the end of the test.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It can be evidenced that involving technologies (videos) is equivalent to basic instruction by experts. OSATS is useful in formative assessment.</p><p>In conclusion, the method of instruction with video or accompaniment of experts are equivalent to the final result measured by the OSATS scale, as the perception of confidence of the students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324000196/pdfft?md5=eb940bb31ddabc99405c89264470a1a4&pid=1-s2.0-S1575181324000196-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324000196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Training students in non-clinical scenarios is necessary to prepare them for their encounters with patients.

Methods

An experimental prospective cohort research was conducted, with undergraduate students who performed a pretest, with previous theoretical instruction, then they were randomized into 3 groups, group 1 was accompanied by a surgeon, group 2 was accompanied by scrub nurse and group 3 practiced with videos. Subsequently, they performed a post-test, which was reviewed asyncronically by another surgeon, applying OSATS. In addition, students conducted surveys about their confidence.

Results

59 students participated, in the pretest the students behaved homogeneously. In the post-test, there was statistically significant improvement in all groups (p<0.001), with no differences between groups. Confidence in unsupervised suturing, instrument handling, and anxiety improved in all students at the end of the test.

Conclusion

It can be evidenced that involving technologies (videos) is equivalent to basic instruction by experts. OSATS is useful in formative assessment.

In conclusion, the method of instruction with video or accompaniment of experts are equivalent to the final result measured by the OSATS scale, as the perception of confidence of the students.

通过 OSATS 评估技术缝合技能,比较不同的指导和辅导方法
方法进行了一项实验性前瞻性队列研究,对本科生进行了前测,并事先进行了理论指导,然后将他们随机分为 3 组,第 1 组由外科医生陪同,第 2 组由擦洗护士陪同,第 3 组通过视频进行练习。随后,他们进行后测,由另一名外科医生应用 OSATS 进行同步复查。结果59名学生参加了测试,在前测中,学生表现一致。在后测试中,各组学生的成绩均有显著提高(p<0.001),组间无差异。在测试结束时,所有学生在无人监督的情况下进行缝合的信心、器械操作和焦虑情绪都有所改善。总之,使用视频或专家指导的方法与 OSATS 量表测量的最终结果相同,即学生的信心感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信