How Does Telehealth Expansion Change Access to Healthcare for Patients With Different Types of Substance Use Disorders?

Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-17 DOI:10.1177/29767342241236028
Alyssa Shell Tilhou, Marguerite Burns, Preeti Chachlani, Ying Chen, Laura Dague
{"title":"How Does Telehealth Expansion Change Access to Healthcare for Patients With Different Types of Substance Use Disorders?","authors":"Alyssa Shell Tilhou, Marguerite Burns, Preeti Chachlani, Ying Chen, Laura Dague","doi":"10.1177/29767342241236028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) exhibit low healthcare utilization despite high medical need. Telehealth could boost utilization, but variation in uptake across SUDs is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Wisconsin Medicaid enrollment and claims data from December 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, we conducted a cohort study of telemedicine uptake in the all-ambulatory and the primary care setting during telehealth expansion following the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) onset (March 14, 2020). The sample included continuously enrolled (19 months), nonpregnant, nondisabled adults aged 19 to 64 years with opioid (OUD), alcohol (AUD), stimulant (StimUD), or cannabis (CannUD) use disorder or polysubstance use (PSU). Outcomes: total and telehealth visits in the week, and fraction of visits in the week completed by telehealth. Linear and fractional regression estimated changes in in-person and telemedicine utilization. We used regression coefficients to calculate the change in telemedicine utilization, the proportion of in-person decline offset by telemedicine uptake (\"offset\"), and the share of visits completed by telemedicine (\"share\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort (n = 16 756) included individuals with OUD (34.8%), AUD (30.1%), StimUD (9.5%), CannUD (9.5%), and PSU (19.7%). Total and telemedicine utilization varied by group post-PHE. All-ambulatory: total visits dropped for all, then rose above baseline for OUD, PSU, and AUD. Telehealth expansion was associated with visit increases: OUD: 0.489, <i>P</i> < .001; PSU: 0.341, <i>P</i> < .001; StimUD: 0.160, <i>P</i> < .001; AUD: 0.132, <i>P</i> < .001; CannUD: 0.115, <i>P</i> < .001. StimUD exhibited the greatest telemedicine share. Primary care: total visits dropped for all, then recovered for OUD and CannUD. Telemedicine visits rose most for PSU: 0.021, <i>P</i> < .001; OUD: 0.019, <i>P</i> < .001; CannUD: 0.011, <i>P</i> < .001; AUD: 0.010, <i>P</i> < .001; StimUD: 0.009, <i>P</i> < .001. PSU and OUD exhibited the greatest telemedicine share, while StimUD exhibited the lowest. Telemedicine fully offset declines for OUD only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telehealth expansion helped maintain utilization for OUD and PSU; StimUD and CannUD showed less responsiveness. Telehealth expansion could widen gaps in utilization by SUD type.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241236028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) exhibit low healthcare utilization despite high medical need. Telehealth could boost utilization, but variation in uptake across SUDs is unknown.

Methods: Using Wisconsin Medicaid enrollment and claims data from December 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, we conducted a cohort study of telemedicine uptake in the all-ambulatory and the primary care setting during telehealth expansion following the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) onset (March 14, 2020). The sample included continuously enrolled (19 months), nonpregnant, nondisabled adults aged 19 to 64 years with opioid (OUD), alcohol (AUD), stimulant (StimUD), or cannabis (CannUD) use disorder or polysubstance use (PSU). Outcomes: total and telehealth visits in the week, and fraction of visits in the week completed by telehealth. Linear and fractional regression estimated changes in in-person and telemedicine utilization. We used regression coefficients to calculate the change in telemedicine utilization, the proportion of in-person decline offset by telemedicine uptake ("offset"), and the share of visits completed by telemedicine ("share").

Results: The cohort (n = 16 756) included individuals with OUD (34.8%), AUD (30.1%), StimUD (9.5%), CannUD (9.5%), and PSU (19.7%). Total and telemedicine utilization varied by group post-PHE. All-ambulatory: total visits dropped for all, then rose above baseline for OUD, PSU, and AUD. Telehealth expansion was associated with visit increases: OUD: 0.489, P < .001; PSU: 0.341, P < .001; StimUD: 0.160, P < .001; AUD: 0.132, P < .001; CannUD: 0.115, P < .001. StimUD exhibited the greatest telemedicine share. Primary care: total visits dropped for all, then recovered for OUD and CannUD. Telemedicine visits rose most for PSU: 0.021, P < .001; OUD: 0.019, P < .001; CannUD: 0.011, P < .001; AUD: 0.010, P < .001; StimUD: 0.009, P < .001. PSU and OUD exhibited the greatest telemedicine share, while StimUD exhibited the lowest. Telemedicine fully offset declines for OUD only.

Conclusions: Telehealth expansion helped maintain utilization for OUD and PSU; StimUD and CannUD showed less responsiveness. Telehealth expansion could widen gaps in utilization by SUD type.

远程医疗的扩展如何改变不同类型药物使用失调患者的医疗服务?
背景:尽管医疗需求很高,但药物使用障碍(SUD)患者的医疗利用率却很低。远程医疗可以提高利用率,但不同 SUD 的利用率差异尚不清楚:利用威斯康星州医疗补助计划(Medicaid)从 2018 年 12 月 1 日到 2020 年 12 月 31 日的注册和报销数据,我们对 COVID-19 公共卫生紧急事件(PHE)发生后(2020 年 3 月 14 日)远程医疗扩展期间全门诊和初级保健环境中远程医疗的吸收情况进行了一项队列研究。样本包括连续注册(19 个月)、未怀孕、无残疾的 19 至 64 岁成人,他们患有阿片类药物 (OUD)、酒精 (AUD)、兴奋剂 (StimUD) 或大麻 (CannUD) 使用障碍或多种物质使用 (PSU)。结果:一周内的总就诊次数和远程医疗就诊次数,以及一周内通过远程医疗完成的就诊次数比例。线性回归和分数回归估算了现场和远程医疗利用率的变化。我们使用回归系数来计算远程医疗使用率的变化、远程医疗使用率的上升抵消了亲自就诊率下降的比例("抵消")以及通过远程医疗完成就诊的比例("比例"):研究对象(n = 16 756)包括 OUD(34.8%)、AUD(30.1%)、StimUD(9.5%)、CannUD(9.5%)和 PSU(19.7%)患者。PHE 后各组的总就诊率和远程医疗利用率有所不同。所有禁食者:所有禁食者的总就诊次数均有所下降,而 OUD、PSU 和 AUD 的总就诊次数则高于基线。远程医疗的扩展与就诊次数的增加有关:OUD:0.489,P P P P P P P P P 结论:远程保健的扩展有助于维持 OUD 和 PSU 的使用率;StimUD 和 CannUD 的响应性较低。远程医疗的扩展可能会拉大各 SUD 类型的利用率差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信