Automated Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds on Two-dimensional Gradient-recalled Echo T2* Weighted Images Using a Morphology Filter Bank and Convolutional Neural Network.

Noriko Nishioka, Yukie Shimizu, Toru Shirai, Hisaaki Ochi, Yoshitaka Bito, Kiichi Watanabe, Hiroyuki Kameda, Taisuke Harada, Kohsuke Kudo
{"title":"Automated Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds on Two-dimensional Gradient-recalled Echo T2* Weighted Images Using a Morphology Filter Bank and Convolutional Neural Network.","authors":"Noriko Nishioka, Yukie Shimizu, Toru Shirai, Hisaaki Ochi, Yoshitaka Bito, Kiichi Watanabe, Hiroyuki Kameda, Taisuke Harada, Kohsuke Kudo","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We present a novel algorithm for the automated detection of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) on 2D gradient-recalled echo T2* weighted images (T2*WIs). This approach combines a morphology filter bank with a convolutional neural network (CNN) to improve the efficiency of CMB detection. A technical evaluation was performed to ascertain the algorithm's accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 60 patients with CMBs on T2*WIs were included. The gold standard was set by three neuroradiologists based on the Microbleed Anatomic Rating Scale guidelines. Images with CMBs were extracted from the training dataset comprising 30 cases using a morphology filter bank, and false positives (FPs) were removed based on the threshold of size and signal intensity. The extracted images were used to train the CNN (Vgg16). To determine the effectiveness of the morphology filter bank, the outcomes of the following two methods for detecting CMBs from the 30-case test dataset were compared: (a) employing the morphology filter bank and additional FP removal and (b) comprehensive detection without filters. The trained CNN processed both sets of initial CMB candidates, and the final CMB candidates were compared with the gold standard. The sensitivity and FPs per patient of both methods were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After CNN processing, the morphology-filter-bank-based method had a 95.0% sensitivity with 4.37 FPs per patient. In contrast, the comprehensive method had a 97.5% sensitivity with 25.87 FPs per patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through effective CMB candidate refinement with a morphology filter bank and FP removal with a CNN, we achieved a high CMB detection rate and low FP count. Combining a CNN and morphology filter bank may facilitate the accurate automated detection of CMBs on T2*WIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94126,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We present a novel algorithm for the automated detection of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) on 2D gradient-recalled echo T2* weighted images (T2*WIs). This approach combines a morphology filter bank with a convolutional neural network (CNN) to improve the efficiency of CMB detection. A technical evaluation was performed to ascertain the algorithm's accuracy.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 60 patients with CMBs on T2*WIs were included. The gold standard was set by three neuroradiologists based on the Microbleed Anatomic Rating Scale guidelines. Images with CMBs were extracted from the training dataset comprising 30 cases using a morphology filter bank, and false positives (FPs) were removed based on the threshold of size and signal intensity. The extracted images were used to train the CNN (Vgg16). To determine the effectiveness of the morphology filter bank, the outcomes of the following two methods for detecting CMBs from the 30-case test dataset were compared: (a) employing the morphology filter bank and additional FP removal and (b) comprehensive detection without filters. The trained CNN processed both sets of initial CMB candidates, and the final CMB candidates were compared with the gold standard. The sensitivity and FPs per patient of both methods were compared.

Results: After CNN processing, the morphology-filter-bank-based method had a 95.0% sensitivity with 4.37 FPs per patient. In contrast, the comprehensive method had a 97.5% sensitivity with 25.87 FPs per patient.

Conclusion: Through effective CMB candidate refinement with a morphology filter bank and FP removal with a CNN, we achieved a high CMB detection rate and low FP count. Combining a CNN and morphology filter bank may facilitate the accurate automated detection of CMBs on T2*WIs.

利用形态学滤波器库和卷积神经网络在二维梯度回波 T2* 加权图像上自动检测脑微出血。
目的:我们提出了一种在二维梯度回波 T2* 加权图像(T2*WI)上自动检测脑微出血(CMB)的新型算法。该方法将形态学滤波器组与卷积神经网络(CNN)相结合,提高了 CMB 检测的效率。为确定算法的准确性,进行了技术评估:在这项回顾性研究中,共纳入了 60 名 T2*WI 上有 CMB 的患者。金标准由三位神经放射学专家根据微出血解剖量表指南设定。使用形态学滤波器库从由 30 个病例组成的训练数据集中提取出带有 CMB 的图像,并根据大小和信号强度阈值去除假阳性(FP)。提取的图像用于训练 CNN(Vgg16)。为了确定形态学滤波器库的有效性,我们比较了以下两种从 30 例测试数据集中检测 CMB 的方法的结果:(a) 使用形态学滤波器库和额外的 FP 去除;(b) 不使用滤波器的综合检测。训练有素的 CNN 对这两组初始候选 CMB 进行处理,并将最终候选 CMB 与金标准进行比较。比较了两种方法的灵敏度和每个患者的 FP:结果:经过 CNN 处理后,基于形态学过滤器库的方法灵敏度为 95.0%,每位患者的 FP 为 4.37。相比之下,综合方法的灵敏度为 97.5%,每名患者的 FP 为 25.87 个:通过使用形态学滤波器组对候选 CMB 进行有效细化,并使用 CNN 去除 FP,我们实现了较高的 CMB 检测率和较低的 FP 数量。将 CNN 与形态学滤波器库相结合,有助于在 T2*WI 上准确自动检测 CMB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信