[The prognosis of neck dissection with sternocleidomastoid muscle preservation and resection in advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort analysis].

Q4 Medicine
上海口腔医学 Pub Date : 2023-12-01
Xing-Jin Chen, Ran-Yi Fan, Shi-Cheng Tao, Rui Xue, Xu-Tao Wen, Hua-Ming Mai
{"title":"[The prognosis of neck dissection with sternocleidomastoid muscle preservation and resection in advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort analysis].","authors":"Xing-Jin Chen, Ran-Yi Fan, Shi-Cheng Tao, Rui Xue, Xu-Tao Wen, Hua-Ming Mai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the prognosis of advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (AOSCC) patients undergoing neck dissection with sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) preservation and resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2013 to June 2017, a total of 235 AOSCC patients(stage Ⅲ and stage Ⅳ) who were diagnosed and underwent neck dissection at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, were collected and followed-up. The differences in overall survival(OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS) were compared between different surgical procedures. SPSS 25.0 software package was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 235 patients with postoperative follow-up, 101 patients retained the SCM during operation, and 134 patients had SCM removed. There was no significant difference in 5-year survival rate and 5-year regional recurrence rate between the SCM preservation group and the SCM resection group. Kaplan-Meier method of univariate analysis showed that SCM preservation or resection had no significant difference in OS, LRFS and RRFS. Cox multivariate regression analysis results showed that there was no significant difference between different surgical procedures in OS, LRFS and RRFS, while N stage and postoperative chemoradiotherapy were independent influencing factors for OS, LRFS and RRFS in AOSCC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neck dissection with SCM preservation in AOSCC patients has no effect on survival and recurrence (including local recurrence and regional recurrence). It is feasible for AOSCC patients to undergo SCM-preserving neck dissection when metastatic cervical lymph nodes do not invade SCM. N stage and postoperative chemoradiotherapy affect the prognosis of AOSCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21709,"journal":{"name":"上海口腔医学","volume":"32 6","pages":"609-614"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海口腔医学","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the prognosis of advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (AOSCC) patients undergoing neck dissection with sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) preservation and resection.

Methods: From January 2013 to June 2017, a total of 235 AOSCC patients(stage Ⅲ and stage Ⅳ) who were diagnosed and underwent neck dissection at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangxi Medical University, were collected and followed-up. The differences in overall survival(OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS) were compared between different surgical procedures. SPSS 25.0 software package was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Among 235 patients with postoperative follow-up, 101 patients retained the SCM during operation, and 134 patients had SCM removed. There was no significant difference in 5-year survival rate and 5-year regional recurrence rate between the SCM preservation group and the SCM resection group. Kaplan-Meier method of univariate analysis showed that SCM preservation or resection had no significant difference in OS, LRFS and RRFS. Cox multivariate regression analysis results showed that there was no significant difference between different surgical procedures in OS, LRFS and RRFS, while N stage and postoperative chemoradiotherapy were independent influencing factors for OS, LRFS and RRFS in AOSCC patients.

Conclusions: Neck dissection with SCM preservation in AOSCC patients has no effect on survival and recurrence (including local recurrence and regional recurrence). It is feasible for AOSCC patients to undergo SCM-preserving neck dissection when metastatic cervical lymph nodes do not invade SCM. N stage and postoperative chemoradiotherapy affect the prognosis of AOSCC patients.

[晚期口腔鳞状细胞癌保留胸锁乳突肌的颈部切除术和切除术的预后:回顾性队列分析]。
目的:探讨晚期口腔鳞状细胞癌(AOSCC)患者接受保留胸锁乳突肌(SCM)颈部切除术的预后:方法:收集2013年1月至2017年6月在广西医科大学口腔医学院附属医院口腔颌面外科确诊并行颈部切除术的235例AOSCC患者(Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期)的资料并进行随访。比较不同手术方式的总生存率(OS)、无局部复发生存率(LRFS)和无区域复发生存率(RRFS)的差异。统计分析采用SPSS 25.0软件包:在术后随访的 235 例患者中,101 例患者在手术中保留了 SCM,134 例患者切除了 SCM。保留单横纹肌组和切除单横纹肌组的 5 年生存率和 5 年区域复发率无明显差异。Kaplan-Meier 法单变量分析显示,保留或切除 SCM 在 OS、LRFS 和 RRFS 方面无明显差异。Cox多变量回归分析结果显示,不同手术方式对AOSCC患者的OS、LRFS和RRFS无显著差异,而N分期和术后化放疗是AOSCC患者OS、LRFS和RRFS的独立影响因素:结论:保留SCM的颈部切除术对AOSCC患者的生存率和复发率(包括局部复发和区域复发)没有影响。当转移性颈淋巴结未侵犯SCM时,AOSCC患者接受保留SCM的颈部清扫术是可行的。N分期和术后化放疗会影响AOSCC患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
上海口腔医学
上海口腔医学 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5299
期刊介绍: "Shanghai Journal of Stomatology (SJS)" is a comprehensive academic journal of stomatology directed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University and sponsored by the Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The main columns include basic research, clinical research, column articles, clinical summaries, reviews, academic lectures, etc., which are suitable for reference by clinicians, scientific researchers and teaching personnel at all levels engaged in oral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信