Does the presence of an esophageal motor disorder influence the response to anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for refractory GERD?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Philippe Onana Ndong, Jean-Michel Gonzalez, Ana Beyrne, Marc Barthet, Veronique Vitton
{"title":"Does the presence of an esophageal motor disorder influence the response to anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for refractory GERD?","authors":"Philippe Onana Ndong, Jean-Michel Gonzalez, Ana Beyrne, Marc Barthet, Veronique Vitton","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2331554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prevalence of esophageal motor disorders (EMD) in PPI-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is substantial. However, limited data exist on their impact on the efficacy of endoscopic treatments like anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS). This study aimed to evaluate the influence of EMD on ARMS efficacy in patients with PPI-refractory GERD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This single-center retrospective study enrolled patients with refractory GERD treated with ARMS-b (anti-reflux mucosectomy band-ligation). High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) was conducted before the procedure to identify EMD presence. The primary endpoint was treatment efficacy, defined as >50% improvement in GERD-HRQL score at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included PPI intake, symptom control, ARMS complications, and overall patient satisfaction at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 65 patients, with 41 (63.1%) showing EMD on HREM. Treatment efficacy was achieved by 33.8% (22) of patients, with 8 without EMD, 11 having isolated LES hypotonia, and 3 with both LES hypotonia and esophageal body motor disorder. No significant differences were observed between patients with and without EMD regarding the primary endpoint, PPI use, symptom control, or complications. Dysphagia developed in 52.3% (34) within 6 months, leading to esophageal dilatation in 15.3% (10). Two patients experienced acute hemorrhage, and one had perforation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of esophageal motor disorders does not seem to impact ARMS response, suggesting the technique's consideration in this population. Larger studies are essential for confirming these results and exploring treatment response and post-operative predictors.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"639-646"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2331554","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of esophageal motor disorders (EMD) in PPI-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is substantial. However, limited data exist on their impact on the efficacy of endoscopic treatments like anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS). This study aimed to evaluate the influence of EMD on ARMS efficacy in patients with PPI-refractory GERD.

Method: This single-center retrospective study enrolled patients with refractory GERD treated with ARMS-b (anti-reflux mucosectomy band-ligation). High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) was conducted before the procedure to identify EMD presence. The primary endpoint was treatment efficacy, defined as >50% improvement in GERD-HRQL score at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included PPI intake, symptom control, ARMS complications, and overall patient satisfaction at 12 months.

Results: The study included 65 patients, with 41 (63.1%) showing EMD on HREM. Treatment efficacy was achieved by 33.8% (22) of patients, with 8 without EMD, 11 having isolated LES hypotonia, and 3 with both LES hypotonia and esophageal body motor disorder. No significant differences were observed between patients with and without EMD regarding the primary endpoint, PPI use, symptom control, or complications. Dysphagia developed in 52.3% (34) within 6 months, leading to esophageal dilatation in 15.3% (10). Two patients experienced acute hemorrhage, and one had perforation.

Conclusion: The presence of esophageal motor disorders does not seem to impact ARMS response, suggesting the technique's consideration in this population. Larger studies are essential for confirming these results and exploring treatment response and post-operative predictors.

食管运动障碍是否会影响抗反流粘液切除术(ARMS)治疗难治性胃食管反流病的效果?
简介:PPI难治性胃食管反流病(GERD)中食管运动障碍(EMD)的发病率很高。然而,关于它们对抗反流粘液切除术(ARMS)等内窥镜治疗效果的影响的数据却很有限。本研究旨在评估 EMD 对 PPI 难治性胃食管反流病患者 ARMS 疗效的影响:这项单中心回顾性研究招募了接受 ARMS-b(抗反流粘膜切除带结扎术)治疗的难治性胃食管反流病患者。术前进行了高分辨率食管测压(HREM),以确定是否存在 EMD。主要终点是治疗效果,即 1 年后胃食管反流-HRQL 评分改善>50%。次要终点包括PPI摄入量、症状控制、ARMS并发症以及12个月时患者的总体满意度:研究共纳入 65 名患者,其中 41 人(63.1%)在 HREM 上显示出 EMD。33.8%的患者(22人)获得了治疗效果,其中8人无EMD,11人有孤立的LES肌张力减低,3人同时有LES肌张力减低和食管体运动障碍。在主要终点、PPI使用、症状控制或并发症方面,未观察到有EMD和无EMD患者之间存在明显差异。52.3% 的患者(34 例)在 6 个月内出现吞咽困难,15.3% 的患者(10 例)出现食管扩张。两名患者出现急性出血,一名患者出现穿孔:结论:食管运动障碍似乎不会影响 ARMS 的反应,这表明该技术可用于此类人群。更大规模的研究对于证实这些结果、探索治疗反应和术后预测因素至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信