A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of different cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia intervention delivery approaches in adult cancer survivors.

Abstract

Background: Cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is considered the gold standard treatment for insomnia. Prior trials have delivered CBT-I across a range of treatment sessions. Understanding the economics of varying treatment approaches is essential for future implementation considerations.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis from the provider's perspective, comparing the implementation of a three-session CBT-I program for cancer survivors (CBT-I-CS) versus a stepped care treatment approach consisting of an initial single sleep education session followed by CBT-I-CS if elevated insomnia symptoms persisted. The effectiveness measure used was the percentage of participants whose insomnia had remitted by the end of each program.

Results: Stepped care delivery was more effective than CBT-I-CS alone, resulting in 35.4% more remitted patients by the end of the overall program. For a $480 willingness to pay threshold per percentage of remitted patients, stepped care CBT-I-CS reached a 98% probability of being cost-effective, while CBT-I-CS alone had only a 2% probability. Larger group sessions in the first step of a stepped care delivery model resulted in more favorable cost-effectiveness.

Conclusions: A stepped care delivery model may be a more cost-effective approach if it can be implemented efficiently. These findings inform policies aimed at improving cancer survivors' access to much-needed insomnia treatment in settings where financial resources for CBT-I may be limited, and be an important barrier to treatment dissemination.

Clinical trial registration: These analyses were not registered.