A proposal for reducing maximum target doses of drugs for psychosis: Reviewing dose-response literature.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-17 DOI:10.1177/02698811241239543
James R O'Neill, Adam Jameson, Samantha L McLean, Michael Dixon, Alastair G Cardno, Christopher Lawrence
{"title":"A proposal for reducing maximum target doses of drugs for psychosis: Reviewing dose-response literature.","authors":"James R O'Neill, Adam Jameson, Samantha L McLean, Michael Dixon, Alastair G Cardno, Christopher Lawrence","doi":"10.1177/02698811241239543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Presently, there is limited guidance on the maximal dosing of psychosis drugs that is based on effectiveness rather than safety or toxicity. Current maximum dosing recommendations may far exceed the necessary degree of dopamine D<sub>2</sub> receptor blockade required to treat psychosis. This may lead to excess harm through cognitive impairment and side effects.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This analysis aimed to establish guidance for prescribers by optimally dosing drugs for psychosis based on efficacy and benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from two dose-response meta-analyses and reviewed seven of the most prescribed drugs for psychosis in the UK. Where data were not available, we used appropriate comparison techniques based on D<sub>2</sub> receptor occupancy to extrapolate our recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the likely threshold dose for achieving remission of psychotic symptoms was often significantly below the currently licensed dose for these drugs. We therefore recommend that clinicians are cautious about exceeding our recommended doses. Individual factors, however, should be accounted for. We outline potentially relevant factors including age, ethnicity, sex, smoking status and pharmacogenetics. Additionally, we recommend therapeutic drug monitoring as a tool to determine individual pharmacokinetic variation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, we propose a new set of maximum target doses for psychosis drugs based on efficacy. Further research through randomised controlled trials should be undertaken to evaluate the effect of reducing doses from current licensing maximums or from doses that are above our recommendations. However, dose reductions should be implemented in a manner that accounts for and reduces the effects of drug withdrawal.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"344-352"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811241239543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Presently, there is limited guidance on the maximal dosing of psychosis drugs that is based on effectiveness rather than safety or toxicity. Current maximum dosing recommendations may far exceed the necessary degree of dopamine D2 receptor blockade required to treat psychosis. This may lead to excess harm through cognitive impairment and side effects.

Aims: This analysis aimed to establish guidance for prescribers by optimally dosing drugs for psychosis based on efficacy and benefit.

Methods: We used data from two dose-response meta-analyses and reviewed seven of the most prescribed drugs for psychosis in the UK. Where data were not available, we used appropriate comparison techniques based on D2 receptor occupancy to extrapolate our recommendations.

Results: We found that the likely threshold dose for achieving remission of psychotic symptoms was often significantly below the currently licensed dose for these drugs. We therefore recommend that clinicians are cautious about exceeding our recommended doses. Individual factors, however, should be accounted for. We outline potentially relevant factors including age, ethnicity, sex, smoking status and pharmacogenetics. Additionally, we recommend therapeutic drug monitoring as a tool to determine individual pharmacokinetic variation.

Conclusions: In summary, we propose a new set of maximum target doses for psychosis drugs based on efficacy. Further research through randomised controlled trials should be undertaken to evaluate the effect of reducing doses from current licensing maximums or from doses that are above our recommendations. However, dose reductions should be implemented in a manner that accounts for and reduces the effects of drug withdrawal.

降低治疗精神病药物最大目标剂量的建议:回顾剂量反应文献。
背景:目前,有关精神病药物最大剂量的指导非常有限,其依据是有效性而非安全性或毒性。目前的最大剂量建议可能远远超出治疗精神病所需的多巴胺 D2 受体阻断的必要程度。目的:本分析旨在为处方者提供指导,根据疗效和益处确定治疗精神病药物的最佳剂量:我们使用了两项剂量反应荟萃分析的数据,并对英国处方量最大的七种治疗精神病的药物进行了回顾。在没有数据的情况下,我们根据 D2 受体的占有率使用适当的比较技术来推断我们的建议:结果:我们发现,实现精神病症状缓解的可能临界剂量往往大大低于这些药物目前的许可剂量。因此,我们建议临床医生谨慎行事,不要超过我们推荐的剂量。不过,个人因素也应考虑在内。我们概述了潜在的相关因素,包括年龄、种族、性别、吸烟状况和药物遗传学。此外,我们建议将治疗药物监测作为确定个体药代动力学变化的工具:总之,我们根据疗效提出了一套新的精神病药物最大目标剂量。应通过随机对照试验开展进一步研究,以评估从目前的许可最大剂量或高于我们建议的剂量中减少剂量的效果。不过,在减少剂量时应考虑到并减少停药的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信