Safety and Effectiveness of Elotuzumab in Japanese Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Post-marketing Surveillance Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-15 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.2169/internalmedicine.2487-23
Fumiya Kaneko, Hiroshi Suzuka, Tomoaki Yoshino, Ryosuke Hinosugi
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of Elotuzumab in Japanese Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Post-marketing Surveillance Study.","authors":"Fumiya Kaneko, Hiroshi Suzuka, Tomoaki Yoshino, Ryosuke Hinosugi","doi":"10.2169/internalmedicine.2487-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (ELd) was approved in Japan in 2016 for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This post-marketing surveillance study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of ELd in RRMM patients during routine clinical practice in Japan. Methods Elotuzumab safety was assessed by evaluating adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and effectiveness was assessed primarily by the best overall response. Patients The study enrolled patients with RRMM who received ELd therapy between November 18, 2016, and June 18, 2017. The safety and effectiveness analysis sets included 831 and 755 patients, respectively. Results In the safety analysis set, patients received a median (range) of 12 (1-40) elotuzumab administrations over 108 (1-728) days of treatment. The relative dose intensity of elotuzumab was ≥90% in 74.1% of patients. ADRs and serious ADRs were reported in 41.2% and 15.2% of the patients, respectively. The most common ADR was infection (12.0%), followed by lymphocytopenia (10.1%), infusion reactions (7.5%), secondary malignancies (e.g., gastric cancer and pancreatic carcinoma), cataracts, and interstitial lung disease (0.2% each). While most patients with ADRs recovered, 71 discontinued treatment, and 14 deaths were reported. The presence of comorbidities, particularly cardiovascular disorders, significantly affected the safety. The overall response rate was 41.1%. Conclusion This all-case post-marketing surveillance study showed that ELd had an acceptable tolerability profile and promising clinical activity in Japanese patients with RRMM.</p>","PeriodicalId":13719,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3039-3048"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.2487-23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (ELd) was approved in Japan in 2016 for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This post-marketing surveillance study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of ELd in RRMM patients during routine clinical practice in Japan. Methods Elotuzumab safety was assessed by evaluating adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and effectiveness was assessed primarily by the best overall response. Patients The study enrolled patients with RRMM who received ELd therapy between November 18, 2016, and June 18, 2017. The safety and effectiveness analysis sets included 831 and 755 patients, respectively. Results In the safety analysis set, patients received a median (range) of 12 (1-40) elotuzumab administrations over 108 (1-728) days of treatment. The relative dose intensity of elotuzumab was ≥90% in 74.1% of patients. ADRs and serious ADRs were reported in 41.2% and 15.2% of the patients, respectively. The most common ADR was infection (12.0%), followed by lymphocytopenia (10.1%), infusion reactions (7.5%), secondary malignancies (e.g., gastric cancer and pancreatic carcinoma), cataracts, and interstitial lung disease (0.2% each). While most patients with ADRs recovered, 71 discontinued treatment, and 14 deaths were reported. The presence of comorbidities, particularly cardiovascular disorders, significantly affected the safety. The overall response rate was 41.1%. Conclusion This all-case post-marketing surveillance study showed that ELd had an acceptable tolerability profile and promising clinical activity in Japanese patients with RRMM.

埃洛珠单抗对日本复发性/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的安全性和有效性:上市后监测研究
目的 埃洛珠单抗联合来那度胺和地塞米松(ELd)于2016年在日本获批用于治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)。这项上市后监测研究评估了ELd在日本常规临床实践中治疗RRMM患者的安全性和有效性。方法 埃洛珠单抗的安全性通过评估药物不良反应(ADR)来评价,有效性主要通过最佳总体反应来评价。患者 该研究招募了在2016年11月18日至2017年6月18日期间接受ELd治疗的RRMM患者。安全性和有效性分析集分别包括831名和755名患者。结果 在安全性分析组中,患者在108(1-728)天的治疗中接受了12(1-40)次埃洛珠单抗给药,中位数(范围)为12(1-40)次。在74.1%的患者中,艾洛妥珠单抗的相对剂量强度≥90%。分别有41.2%和15.2%的患者报告了不良反应和严重不良反应。最常见的不良反应是感染(12.0%),其次是淋巴细胞减少(10.1%)、输液反应(7.5%)、继发性恶性肿瘤(如胃癌和胰腺癌)、白内障和间质性肺病(各占 0.2%)。虽然大多数出现不良反应的患者都痊愈了,但也有 71 人中断了治疗,14 人死亡。合并症(尤其是心血管疾病)的存在严重影响了治疗的安全性。总体反应率为 41.1%。结论 这项上市后所有病例的监测研究表明,ELd在日本RRMM患者中具有可接受的耐受性和良好的临床活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine
Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Internal Medicine is an open-access online only journal published monthly by the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. Articles must be prepared in accordance with "The Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (see Annals of Internal Medicine 108: 258-265, 1988), must be contributed solely to the Internal Medicine, and become the property of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. Statements contained therein are the responsibility of the author(s). The Society reserves copyright and renewal on all published material and such material may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信