Diagnostic validity and reliability of BT-RADS in the management of recurrent high-grade glioma

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Noha Yahia Ebaid , Rasha Nadeem Ahmed , Mostafa Mohamad Assy , Mohamed Ibrahim Amin , Ahmed Mohamad Alaa Eldin , Ahmed Mohamed Alsowey , Rabab Mohamed Abdelhay
{"title":"Diagnostic validity and reliability of BT-RADS in the management of recurrent high-grade glioma","authors":"Noha Yahia Ebaid ,&nbsp;Rasha Nadeem Ahmed ,&nbsp;Mostafa Mohamad Assy ,&nbsp;Mohamed Ibrahim Amin ,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohamad Alaa Eldin ,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohamed Alsowey ,&nbsp;Rabab Mohamed Abdelhay","doi":"10.1016/j.neurad.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>BT-RADS is a new framework system for reporting the treatment response of brain tumors. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic performance and reliability of the BT-RADS in predicting the recurrence of high-grade glioma (HGG).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>This prospective single-center study recruited 81 cases with previously operated and pathologically proven HGG. The patients underwent baseline and follow-up contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI). Two neuro-radiologists with ten years-experience in neuroimaging independently analyzed and interpreted the MRI images and assigned a BT-RADS category for each case. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the BT-RADS for detecting recurrent HGG, the reference standard was the histopathology for BT-RADS categories 3 and 4, while neurological clinical examination and clinical follow up were used as a reference for BT-RADS categories 1 and 2. The inter-reader agreement was assessed using the Cohen's Kappa test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 81 cases of HGG, of which 42 were recurrent and 39 were non-recurrent HGG cases based on the reference test. BT-RADS 3B was the best cutoff for predicting recurrent HGG with a sensitivity of 90.5 % to 92.9 %, specificity of 76.9 % to 84.6 %, and accuracy of 83.9 % to 88.9 %, based on both readers. The BT-RADS showed a substantial inter-reader agreement with a <em>K</em> of 0.710 (<em>P = 0.001</em>).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The BT-RADS is a valid and reliable framework for predicting recurrent HGG. Moreover, BT-RADS can help neuro-oncologists make clinical decisions that can potentially improve the patient's outcome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986124001111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

BT-RADS is a new framework system for reporting the treatment response of brain tumors. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic performance and reliability of the BT-RADS in predicting the recurrence of high-grade glioma (HGG).

Materials and Methods

This prospective single-center study recruited 81 cases with previously operated and pathologically proven HGG. The patients underwent baseline and follow-up contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI). Two neuro-radiologists with ten years-experience in neuroimaging independently analyzed and interpreted the MRI images and assigned a BT-RADS category for each case. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the BT-RADS for detecting recurrent HGG, the reference standard was the histopathology for BT-RADS categories 3 and 4, while neurological clinical examination and clinical follow up were used as a reference for BT-RADS categories 1 and 2. The inter-reader agreement was assessed using the Cohen's Kappa test.

Results

The study included 81 cases of HGG, of which 42 were recurrent and 39 were non-recurrent HGG cases based on the reference test. BT-RADS 3B was the best cutoff for predicting recurrent HGG with a sensitivity of 90.5 % to 92.9 %, specificity of 76.9 % to 84.6 %, and accuracy of 83.9 % to 88.9 %, based on both readers. The BT-RADS showed a substantial inter-reader agreement with a K of 0.710 (P = 0.001).

Conclusions

The BT-RADS is a valid and reliable framework for predicting recurrent HGG. Moreover, BT-RADS can help neuro-oncologists make clinical decisions that can potentially improve the patient's outcome.

BT-RADS 在复发性高级别胶质瘤治疗中的诊断有效性和可靠性
背景和目的:BT-RADS是报告脑肿瘤治疗反应的新框架系统。本研究旨在评估 BT-RADS 在预测高级别胶质瘤(HGG)复发方面的诊断性能和可靠性:这项前瞻性单中心研究共招募了81例既往接受过手术且病理证实为高级别胶质瘤的患者。患者均接受了基线和随访对比增强磁共振成像(CE-MRI)检查。两名具有十年神经影像学经验的神经放射科医生独立分析和解读磁共振成像图像,并为每个病例指定一个 BT-RADS 类别。为了评估 BT-RADS 检测复发性 HGG 的诊断准确性,BT-RADS 类别 3 和 4 的参考标准是组织病理学,而 BT-RADS 类别 1 和 2 的参考标准是神经系统临床检查和临床随访。阅读者之间的一致性采用 Cohen's Kappa 检验进行评估:研究共纳入 81 例 HGG,其中 42 例为复发性 HGG,39 例为非复发性 HGG。BT-RADS 3B 是预测复发性 HGG 的最佳临界值,其敏感性为 90.5% 至 92.9%,特异性为 76.9% 至 84.6%,准确性为 83.9% 至 88.9%。BT-RADS的读数间一致性很高,K值为0.710(P = 0.001):结论:BT-RADS 是预测复发性 HGG 的有效而可靠的框架。结论:BT-RADS 是预测复发性 HGG 的有效而可靠的框架,此外,BT-RADS 还能帮助神经肿瘤专家做出临床决策,从而改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroradiology
Journal of Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroradiology is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing worldwide clinical and basic research in the field of diagnostic and Interventional neuroradiology, translational and molecular neuroimaging, and artificial intelligence in neuroradiology. The Journal of Neuroradiology considers for publication articles, reviews, technical notes and letters to the editors (correspondence section), provided that the methodology and scientific content are of high quality, and that the results will have substantial clinical impact and/or physiological importance.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信