Effect of blood conservation protocol on the utilisation of blood and outcome of patients undergoing open heart surgery.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Perfusion-Uk Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-16 DOI:10.1177/02676591241239838
Vivek Bagaria, Lahari Badragiri, C S Hiremath
{"title":"Effect of blood conservation protocol on the utilisation of blood and outcome of patients undergoing open heart surgery.","authors":"Vivek Bagaria, Lahari Badragiri, C S Hiremath","doi":"10.1177/02676591241239838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cardiac surgery is fraught with increased consumption of blood and blood products. Various strategies for blood conservation have been described. Our aim was to study the impact of a structured blood conservation protocol (BCP) on the utilization of blood and patient outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data comparing adult patients undergoing open heart surgery with BCP with those undergoing surgery without BCP. The primary objective was to compare the amount of blood utilized and the hematocrit at discharge. The secondary objective was to compare the parameters of patient outcomes. The level of significance was set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of patients requiring transfusion (19.1% [9/47] vs 58.9% [33/56]; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the quantity of blood transfused (12 units vs 45 units; <i>p</i> 0.003) in the BCP group was significantly lower. Interestingly, the hematocrit level at discharge was comparable between the groups (30.9 (4.8) versus 31.8 (2.4), p-0.671). The average cost incurred for transfusing blood in the BCP group was ₹ 370.2 as compared to ₹1165.1 in the other (<i>p</i> < 0.001). BCP reduced the odds of overall blood transfusion by 79.8% (OR 0.202 (0.084-0.485); <i>p</i> < 0.001) and intraoperative blood transfusion by 95.3% (OR 0.047 (0.010-0.213); <i>p</i> < 0.001). The morbidity and mortality were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing a structured blood conservation protocol in patients undergoing open heart surgery significantly reduces the need for blood transfusion. It also has a promising impact on patient recovery after surgery and significant positive cost implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":" ","pages":"450-459"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241239838","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiac surgery is fraught with increased consumption of blood and blood products. Various strategies for blood conservation have been described. Our aim was to study the impact of a structured blood conservation protocol (BCP) on the utilization of blood and patient outcome.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data comparing adult patients undergoing open heart surgery with BCP with those undergoing surgery without BCP. The primary objective was to compare the amount of blood utilized and the hematocrit at discharge. The secondary objective was to compare the parameters of patient outcomes. The level of significance was set at 0.05.

Results: The proportion of patients requiring transfusion (19.1% [9/47] vs 58.9% [33/56]; p < 0.001) and the quantity of blood transfused (12 units vs 45 units; p 0.003) in the BCP group was significantly lower. Interestingly, the hematocrit level at discharge was comparable between the groups (30.9 (4.8) versus 31.8 (2.4), p-0.671). The average cost incurred for transfusing blood in the BCP group was ₹ 370.2 as compared to ₹1165.1 in the other (p < 0.001). BCP reduced the odds of overall blood transfusion by 79.8% (OR 0.202 (0.084-0.485); p < 0.001) and intraoperative blood transfusion by 95.3% (OR 0.047 (0.010-0.213); p < 0.001). The morbidity and mortality were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion: Implementing a structured blood conservation protocol in patients undergoing open heart surgery significantly reduces the need for blood transfusion. It also has a promising impact on patient recovery after surgery and significant positive cost implications.

血液保存方案对开放式心脏手术患者血液利用率和预后的影响。
导言:心脏手术需要消耗更多的血液和血液制品。人们已经描述了各种血液保存策略。我们的目的是研究结构化血液保存方案(BCP)对血液利用率和患者预后的影响:方法:对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析,比较接受开胸手术并实施 BCP 的成年患者与未实施 BCP 的患者。主要目的是比较出院时的用血量和血细胞比容。次要目标是比较患者的预后参数。显著性水平定为 0.05:结果:BCP 组需要输血的患者比例(19.1% [9/47] vs 58.9% [33/56];P < 0.001)和输血量(12 单位 vs 45 单位;P 0.003)显著低于 BCP 组。有趣的是,两组患者出院时的血细胞比容水平相当(30.9 (4.8) 对 31.8 (2.4),P-0.671)。BCP 组的平均输血费用为 370.2 英镑,而另一组为 1165.1 英镑(P < 0.001)。BCP 可将总体输血几率降低 79.8%(OR 0.202 (0.084-0.485); p < 0.001),将术中输血几率降低 95.3%(OR 0.047 (0.010-0.213); p < 0.001)。两组的发病率和死亡率相当:结论:对接受开胸手术的患者实施结构化血液保存方案可显著减少输血需求。结论:在接受开胸手术的患者中实施结构化血液保存方案可大幅减少输血需求,对患者术后恢复也有积极影响,并对成本产生重大积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信