Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Simulation Modalities in First Year Nursing Students

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Valerie Pauli EdD, MSN, RN, ACNS-BC, CNE, Kathryn Hughesdon PhD, RN
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Simulation Modalities in First Year Nursing Students","authors":"Valerie Pauli EdD, MSN, RN, ACNS-BC, CNE,&nbsp;Kathryn Hughesdon PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study explored differences in knowledge, skill, and confidence, of first-year baccalaureate nursing students (N=104) who completed either a low-fidelity simulation (control group, n=46) or a web-based virtual reality (WebVR) simulation (experimental group, n=56) related to the nursing concept of airway management.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A randomized controlled trial, mixed methods, pre-test post-test design was used in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both groups had an increase in mean scores, on both outcome measures. Participants in the control group had significantly greater differences (<em>p</em>&lt;.05) on the knowledge and skills survey and the confidence survey compared to the experimental group. Qualitative findings revealed students from both groups perceived gains in improving assessment and communication skills, and future practice would be impacted by better prioritization abilities. While students perceived the WebVR to be useful, they did not feel it was easy to use which resulted in feeling stressed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Low-fidelity simulation might be more beneficial than WebVR simulations with first-year nursing students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study explored differences in knowledge, skill, and confidence, of first-year baccalaureate nursing students (N=104) who completed either a low-fidelity simulation (control group, n=46) or a web-based virtual reality (WebVR) simulation (experimental group, n=56) related to the nursing concept of airway management.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial, mixed methods, pre-test post-test design was used in this study.

Results

Both groups had an increase in mean scores, on both outcome measures. Participants in the control group had significantly greater differences (p<.05) on the knowledge and skills survey and the confidence survey compared to the experimental group. Qualitative findings revealed students from both groups perceived gains in improving assessment and communication skills, and future practice would be impacted by better prioritization abilities. While students perceived the WebVR to be useful, they did not feel it was easy to use which resulted in feeling stressed.

Conclusion

Low-fidelity simulation might be more beneficial than WebVR simulations with first-year nursing students.

护理专业一年级学生模拟模式比较随机对照试验
背景本研究探讨了完成与气道管理护理概念相关的低保真模拟(对照组,人数=46)或基于网络的虚拟现实(WebVR)模拟(实验组,人数=56)的一年级本科护理学生(人数=104)在知识、技能和信心方面的差异。与实验组相比,对照组学员在知识和技能调查以及信心调查方面的差异明显更大(p<.05)。定性研究结果显示,两组学生都认为自己在提高评估和沟通技能方面有所收获,而更好的优先排序能力也将对今后的实践产生影响。虽然学生们认为 WebVR 很有用,但他们并不觉得 WebVR 易于使用,因此感到压力很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信