Disparities in Medical School Clerkship Grades Associated With Sex, Race, and Ethnicity: A Person-Centered Approach.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005690
Paulina Perez Mejias, Gustavo Lara, Alex Duran, Rashelle Musci, Nancy A Hueppchen, Roy C Ziegelstein, Pamela A Lipsett
{"title":"Disparities in Medical School Clerkship Grades Associated With Sex, Race, and Ethnicity: A Person-Centered Approach.","authors":"Paulina Perez Mejias, Gustavo Lara, Alex Duran, Rashelle Musci, Nancy A Hueppchen, Roy C Ziegelstein, Pamela A Lipsett","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether students' self-reported race/ethnicity and sex were associated with grades earned in 7 core clerkships. A person-centered approach was used to group students based on observed clerkship grade patterns. Predictors of group membership and predictive bias by race/ethnicity and sex were investigated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using data from 6 medical student cohorts at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (JHUSOM), latent class analysis was used to classify students based on clerkship grades. Multinomial logistic regression was employed to investigate if preclerkship measures and student demographic characteristics predicted clerkship performance-level groups. Marginal effects for United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 scores were obtained to assess the predictive validity of the test on group membership by race/ethnicity and sex. Predictive bias was examined by comparing multinomial logistic regression prediction errors across racial/ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three clerkship performance-level groups emerged from the data: low, middle, and high. Significant predictors of group membership were race/ethnicity, sex, and USMLE Step 1 scores. Black or African American students were more likely (odds ratio [OR] = 4.26) to be low performers than White students. Black or African American (OR = 0.08) and Asian students (OR = 0.41) were less likely to be high performers than White students. Female students (OR = 2.51) were more likely to be high performers than male students. Patterns of prediction errors observed across racial/ethnic groups showed predictive bias when using USMLE Step 1 scores to predict clerkship performance-level groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities in clerkship grades associated with race/ethnicity were found among JHUSOM students, which persisted after controlling for USMLE Step 1 scores, sex, and other preclerkship performance measures. Differential predictive validity of USMLE Step 1 exam scores and systematic error predictions by race/ethnicity show predictive bias when using USMLE Step 1 scores to predict clerkship performance across racial/ethnic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1007-1015"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005690","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether students' self-reported race/ethnicity and sex were associated with grades earned in 7 core clerkships. A person-centered approach was used to group students based on observed clerkship grade patterns. Predictors of group membership and predictive bias by race/ethnicity and sex were investigated.

Method: Using data from 6 medical student cohorts at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (JHUSOM), latent class analysis was used to classify students based on clerkship grades. Multinomial logistic regression was employed to investigate if preclerkship measures and student demographic characteristics predicted clerkship performance-level groups. Marginal effects for United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 scores were obtained to assess the predictive validity of the test on group membership by race/ethnicity and sex. Predictive bias was examined by comparing multinomial logistic regression prediction errors across racial/ethnic groups.

Results: Three clerkship performance-level groups emerged from the data: low, middle, and high. Significant predictors of group membership were race/ethnicity, sex, and USMLE Step 1 scores. Black or African American students were more likely (odds ratio [OR] = 4.26) to be low performers than White students. Black or African American (OR = 0.08) and Asian students (OR = 0.41) were less likely to be high performers than White students. Female students (OR = 2.51) were more likely to be high performers than male students. Patterns of prediction errors observed across racial/ethnic groups showed predictive bias when using USMLE Step 1 scores to predict clerkship performance-level groups.

Conclusions: Disparities in clerkship grades associated with race/ethnicity were found among JHUSOM students, which persisted after controlling for USMLE Step 1 scores, sex, and other preclerkship performance measures. Differential predictive validity of USMLE Step 1 exam scores and systematic error predictions by race/ethnicity show predictive bias when using USMLE Step 1 scores to predict clerkship performance across racial/ethnic groups.

与性别、种族和民族有关的医学院实习成绩差异:以人为本的方法》。
目的:确定学生自报的种族/民族和性别是否与 7 个核心实习的成绩有关。根据观察到的实习成绩模式,采用以人为本的方法对学生进行分组。研究了分组成员的预测因素以及种族/民族和性别的预测偏差:利用约翰霍普金斯大学医学院(JHUSOM)6个医学生组群的数据,采用潜类分析法根据实习成绩对学生进行分类。采用多项式逻辑回归法来研究实习前的衡量标准和学生的人口统计学特征是否能预测实习成绩水平组别。美国医学执业资格考试(USMLE)第 1 步分数的边际效应用于评估该测试对不同种族/族裔和性别群体成员的预测有效性。通过比较不同种族/族裔群体的多叉逻辑回归预测误差,对预测偏差进行了检验:结果:从数据中得出了三个实习表现水平组别:低、中、高。种族/人种、性别和 USMLE 第 1 步分数是预测组别成员的重要因素。与白人学生相比,黑人或非裔美国人学生更有可能成为成绩较差的学生(几率比 [OR] = 4.26)。黑人或非裔美国人(OR = 0.08)和亚裔学生(OR = 0.41)比白人学生更不可能成为成绩优秀的学生。女生(OR = 2.51)比男生更有可能成为成绩优秀的学生。在使用 USMLE 第 1 步分数预测实习成绩水平组别时,不同种族/族裔组别的预测误差模式显示出预测偏差:结论:在 JHUSOM 学生中发现了与种族/族裔相关的实习成绩差异,在控制了 USMLE 第 1 步分数、性别和其他实习前成绩衡量标准后,这种差异依然存在。USMLE 第 1 步考试分数和系统误差预测的种族/人种差异预测有效性表明,使用 USMLE 第 1 步考试分数预测不同种族/人种群体的实习成绩存在预测偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信