Can MRI Replace Nasopharyngoscopy in the Evaluation of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Jessica L Williams, Jamie L Perry, Taylor D Snodgrass, Davinder J Singh, M'hamed Temkit, Thomas J Sitzman
{"title":"Can MRI Replace Nasopharyngoscopy in the Evaluation of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency?","authors":"Jessica L Williams, Jamie L Perry, Taylor D Snodgrass, Davinder J Singh, M'hamed Temkit, Thomas J Sitzman","doi":"10.1177/10556656241239459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether flexible nasopharyngoscopy, when performed in addition to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), influences the type of surgery selected or success of surgery in patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A metropolitan children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with non-syndromic, repaired cleft palate presenting for management of VPI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>MRI and nasopharyngoscopy or MRI alone for preoperative imaging of the velopharyngeal mechanism.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>(1) Surgical selection and (2) resolution of hypernasality. All speech, MRI, and nasopharyngoscopy measurements were performed by raters blinded to patients' medical and surgical history.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 25 patients referred for nasopharyngoscopy, 76% completed the exam. Of the 41 patients referred for MRI, the scan was successfully completed by 98% of patients. Completion of nasopharyngoscopy was significantly (p=0.01) lower than MRI. Surgical selection did not significantly differ (p=0.73) between the group receiving MRI and nasopharyngoscopy and the group receiving MRI alone, nor was there a significant difference between these groups in the proportion of patients achieving resolution of hypernasality postoperatively (p=0.63). Percent total velopharyngeal closure assessments on nasopharyngoscopy and MRI were strongly correlated (r=0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients receiving MRI as part of their preoperative VPI evaluation, the addition of nasopharyngoscopy did not result in a difference in surgical selection or resolution of hypernasality. Routine inclusion of nasopharyngoscopy may not be necessary for the evaluation of velopharyngeal anatomy when MRI is available.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241239459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether flexible nasopharyngoscopy, when performed in addition to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), influences the type of surgery selected or success of surgery in patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI).

Design: Cohort study.

Setting: A metropolitan children's hospital.

Patients: Patients with non-syndromic, repaired cleft palate presenting for management of VPI.

Interventions: MRI and nasopharyngoscopy or MRI alone for preoperative imaging of the velopharyngeal mechanism.

Main outcome measures: (1) Surgical selection and (2) resolution of hypernasality. All speech, MRI, and nasopharyngoscopy measurements were performed by raters blinded to patients' medical and surgical history.

Results: Of the 25 patients referred for nasopharyngoscopy, 76% completed the exam. Of the 41 patients referred for MRI, the scan was successfully completed by 98% of patients. Completion of nasopharyngoscopy was significantly (p=0.01) lower than MRI. Surgical selection did not significantly differ (p=0.73) between the group receiving MRI and nasopharyngoscopy and the group receiving MRI alone, nor was there a significant difference between these groups in the proportion of patients achieving resolution of hypernasality postoperatively (p=0.63). Percent total velopharyngeal closure assessments on nasopharyngoscopy and MRI were strongly correlated (r=0.73).

Conclusions: In patients receiving MRI as part of their preoperative VPI evaluation, the addition of nasopharyngoscopy did not result in a difference in surgical selection or resolution of hypernasality. Routine inclusion of nasopharyngoscopy may not be necessary for the evaluation of velopharyngeal anatomy when MRI is available.

核磁共振成像能否取代鼻咽镜评估伶咽功能不全?
目的研究在进行磁共振成像(MRI)的同时进行柔性鼻咽镜检查是否会影响咽喉发育不全(VPI)患者选择的手术类型或手术的成功率:设计:队列研究:患者:非综合征性VPI患者干预措施:磁共振成像和鼻咽镜:干预措施:核磁共振成像和鼻咽镜检查或仅用核磁共振成像进行咽喉机制的术前成像:主要结果测量:(1) 手术选择和 (2) 解决鼻音过重问题。所有语言、核磁共振成像和鼻咽镜检查的测量均由对患者病史和手术史保密的评分员进行:结果:在转诊接受鼻咽镜检查的 25 名患者中,76% 完成了检查。在转诊接受核磁共振成像检查的 41 名患者中,98% 的患者成功完成了扫描。鼻咽镜检查的完成率明显低于核磁共振成像(P=0.01)。接受核磁共振成像和鼻咽镜检查的组别与仅接受核磁共振成像检查的组别在手术选择上没有明显差异(p=0.73),两组患者术后解决鼻音过重的比例也没有明显差异(p=0.63)。鼻咽镜检查和核磁共振成像评估的会厌总闭合百分比密切相关(r=0.73):结论:在接受核磁共振成像作为术前VPI评估一部分的患者中,增加鼻咽镜检查并不会导致手术选择或解决过度通气问题方面的差异。在有核磁共振成像的情况下,常规的鼻咽镜检查可能并不是评估咽喉解剖的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信