Association of maternal blood high-mobility group box 1 levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Liping Xue , Ruolin Chen , Ying Liu , Peiguang Niu , Jintuo Zhou , Jinhua Liu , Jinhua Zhang , Huajiao Chen
{"title":"Association of maternal blood high-mobility group box 1 levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Liping Xue ,&nbsp;Ruolin Chen ,&nbsp;Ying Liu ,&nbsp;Peiguang Niu ,&nbsp;Jintuo Zhou ,&nbsp;Jinhua Liu ,&nbsp;Jinhua Zhang ,&nbsp;Huajiao Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.repbio.2024.100859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Conflicting findings have emerged regarding the levels of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) in individuals experiencing adverse pregnancy outcomes. Here we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the association between maternal blood HMGB1 levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Utilizing databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Embase and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), a systematic literature search was conducted in January 2024. Eligible literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality assessment was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The extracted data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 12.0 software. 21 observational studies with a total of 2471 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Significantly higher peripheral blood levels of HMGB1 were associated with preeclampsia (PE) (SMD=1.34; 95% CI: 0.72–1.95; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (SMD=1.20; 95% CI: 0.31–2.09; <em>P</em> = 0.009). Additionally, HMGB1 levels in peripheral blood were significantly elevated in patients with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA) than those in pregnancy controls (SMD=4.22; 95% CI: 1.64–6.80; <em>P</em> = 0.001) or non-pregnancy controls (SMD=3.87; 95% CI: 1.81–5.92; <em>P</em> = 0.0002). Interestingly, higher blood HMGB1 levels were observed in women with preterm birth (PTB), however, the results did not reach a statistical difference (SMD=0.54; 95% CI: −0.36–1.44; <em>P</em> = 0.24). In conclusion, overexpressed maternal blood HMGB1 levels were associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including PE, GDM and URSA. Further studies should be conducted to validate the efficacy of HMGB1 as a biomarker for assessing the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642431X24000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conflicting findings have emerged regarding the levels of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) in individuals experiencing adverse pregnancy outcomes. Here we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the association between maternal blood HMGB1 levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Utilizing databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Embase and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), a systematic literature search was conducted in January 2024. Eligible literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality assessment was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The extracted data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 12.0 software. 21 observational studies with a total of 2471 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Significantly higher peripheral blood levels of HMGB1 were associated with preeclampsia (PE) (SMD=1.34; 95% CI: 0.72–1.95; P < 0.0001) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (SMD=1.20; 95% CI: 0.31–2.09; P = 0.009). Additionally, HMGB1 levels in peripheral blood were significantly elevated in patients with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA) than those in pregnancy controls (SMD=4.22; 95% CI: 1.64–6.80; P = 0.001) or non-pregnancy controls (SMD=3.87; 95% CI: 1.81–5.92; P = 0.0002). Interestingly, higher blood HMGB1 levels were observed in women with preterm birth (PTB), however, the results did not reach a statistical difference (SMD=0.54; 95% CI: −0.36–1.44; P = 0.24). In conclusion, overexpressed maternal blood HMGB1 levels were associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including PE, GDM and URSA. Further studies should be conducted to validate the efficacy of HMGB1 as a biomarker for assessing the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

孕产妇血液中高流动性组方框 1 水平与不良妊娠结局的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析
关于不良妊娠结局患者体内高迁移率组框 1(HMGB1)水平的研究结果存在冲突。在此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估母体血液中 HMGB1 水平与不良妊娠结局之间的关联。我们于 2024 年 1 月利用 PubMed、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Web of Science、Embase 和中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)等数据库进行了系统性文献检索。根据纳入和排除标准对符合条件的文献进行了筛选。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行质量评估。提取的数据使用 Review Manager 5.4 和 STATA 12.0 软件进行分析。本次荟萃分析共纳入了 21 项观察性研究,共有 2471 人参与。外周血中 HMGB1 水平显著升高与子痫前期(PE)(SMD=1.34;95% CI:0.72-1.95;P < 0.0001)和妊娠糖尿病(GDM)(SMD=1.20;95% CI:0.31-2.09;P = 0.009)有关。此外,与妊娠对照组(SMD=4.22;95% CI:1.64-6.80;P = 0.001)或非妊娠对照组(SMD=3.87;95% CI:1.81-5.92;P = 0.0002)相比,不明原因复发性自然流产(URSA)患者外周血中的 HMGB1 水平显著升高。有趣的是,在早产(PTB)妇女中观察到较高的血液 HMGB1 水平,但结果未达到统计学差异(SMD=0.54;95% CI:-0.36-1.44;P = 0.24)。总之,母体血液中过表达的 HMGB1 水平与不良妊娠结局有关,包括 PE、GDM 和 URSA。应开展进一步的研究来验证 HMGB1 作为评估不良妊娠结局风险的生物标志物的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信