Preliminary Experience with Mini-Laparotomy Cholecystectomy in Jos.

Alexander Femi Ale, Mercy W Isichei, Michael A Misauno
{"title":"Preliminary Experience with Mini-Laparotomy Cholecystectomy in Jos.","authors":"Alexander Femi Ale, Mercy W Isichei, Michael A Misauno","doi":"10.4103/jwas.jwas_58_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different techniques have been described for removing a diseased gall bladder; however, cholecystectomy via the laparoscopic approach is currently regarded as the gold standard. Laparoscopic surgery services are not widely available in low- and middle-income countries and mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy may be a suitable alternative in such circumstances. This technique achieves cholecystectomy with a smaller incision and affords the advantages of the laparoscopic approach.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We report our experience over a 2-year period of 24 consecutive patients from two hospitals who underwent mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy to highlight our outcomes with the procedure.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the surgical theatre procedure register and medical records department of the hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, a total of 24 mini-laparotomy cholecystectomies were performed. Fourteen (58.3%) patients had a clinical diagnosis of calculous cholecystitis whereas 10 (41.7%) patients had symptomatic gallstones. There were four males (16.7%) and 20 females (83.3%) giving a male-to-female ratio of 1:5. The ages ranged from 18 to 68 years with a mean of 46.8 years (standard deviation (SD) = 12.7 years) and the mean operating time was 56.3 min (SD = 7.5 min) and ranged from 45 to 72 min. There was no conversion to the traditional large incision cholecystectomy. There were no intra-operative or post-operative complications and there was no mortality in the study. All the patients were discharged 48 h post-op.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy offers the benefits of a minimally invasive procedure such as good cosmesis and short hospital stay. It has a relatively short operative time and a low incidence of complications and can be practised in a low-resource environment, where laparoscopic services are not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":73993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10936898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_58_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Different techniques have been described for removing a diseased gall bladder; however, cholecystectomy via the laparoscopic approach is currently regarded as the gold standard. Laparoscopic surgery services are not widely available in low- and middle-income countries and mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy may be a suitable alternative in such circumstances. This technique achieves cholecystectomy with a smaller incision and affords the advantages of the laparoscopic approach.

Objective: We report our experience over a 2-year period of 24 consecutive patients from two hospitals who underwent mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy to highlight our outcomes with the procedure.

Materials and methods: Data were obtained from the surgical theatre procedure register and medical records department of the hospital.

Results: During the study period, a total of 24 mini-laparotomy cholecystectomies were performed. Fourteen (58.3%) patients had a clinical diagnosis of calculous cholecystitis whereas 10 (41.7%) patients had symptomatic gallstones. There were four males (16.7%) and 20 females (83.3%) giving a male-to-female ratio of 1:5. The ages ranged from 18 to 68 years with a mean of 46.8 years (standard deviation (SD) = 12.7 years) and the mean operating time was 56.3 min (SD = 7.5 min) and ranged from 45 to 72 min. There was no conversion to the traditional large incision cholecystectomy. There were no intra-operative or post-operative complications and there was no mortality in the study. All the patients were discharged 48 h post-op.

Conclusion: Mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy offers the benefits of a minimally invasive procedure such as good cosmesis and short hospital stay. It has a relatively short operative time and a low incidence of complications and can be practised in a low-resource environment, where laparoscopic services are not available.

在乔斯实施迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术的初步经验
背景:切除病变胆囊的技术多种多样,但腹腔镜胆囊切除术目前被视为黄金标准。在中低收入国家,腹腔镜手术服务并不普及,在这种情况下,迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术可能是一个合适的替代方案。这项技术以较小的切口实现胆囊切除术,并具有腹腔镜方法的优点:我们报告了两家医院连续 24 名患者在两年内接受迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术的经验,以强调我们在该手术中取得的成果:数据来自医院的手术室手术登记和病历部门:研究期间,共进行了 24 例迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术。14例(58.3%)患者的临床诊断为结石性胆囊炎,10例(41.7%)患者为无症状胆结石。其中男性 4 人(16.7%),女性 20 人(83.3%),男女比例为 1:5。患者年龄从 18 岁到 68 岁不等,平均年龄为 46.8 岁(标准差 (SD) = 12.7 岁),平均手术时间为 56.3 分钟(标准差 = 7.5 分钟),手术时间从 45 分钟到 72 分钟不等。没有患者转为传统的大切口胆囊切除术。研究中没有术中或术后并发症,也没有死亡病例。所有患者均在术后48小时出院:结论:迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有微创手术的优点,如良好的外观和较短的住院时间。它的手术时间相对较短,并发症发生率较低,可在资源匮乏、无法提供腹腔镜服务的环境中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信