Understanding network meta-analysis methodology for the ophthalmologist.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Current Opinion in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1097/ICU.0000000000001048
Mark Phillips, Varun Chaudhary
{"title":"Understanding network meta-analysis methodology for the ophthalmologist.","authors":"Mark Phillips, Varun Chaudhary","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Over the past decade, the number of studies published using network meta-analyses (NMAs) has rapidly increased, and there have been continued advancements to further advance this analysis approach. Due to the fast moving and changing landscape in the infancy of NMA methodology, there is a lack of consistency and standardization for this approach. This article aims to summarize the crucial components of an NMA for both future readers, and for potential NMA authors.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Key components of NMAs include, but are not limited to, reporting the proposed analysis methods, assessment of risk of bias within the included studies, reporting the overall quality of the available evidence, and defining the parameters in which the results will be presented. Although NMA allows for a comprehensive evaluation of all available treatment options for a given condition, we believe that there is importance in ensuring clear understanding and appropriate interpretation of results to inform clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While many components of NMA mirror those of traditional pairwise meta-analysis, there are many novel methodologies that are specific to this approach. It is imperative that future NMAs follow guidance from key methodology groups, as these provide valuable tools for conducting and reporting NMAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"260-264"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000001048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Over the past decade, the number of studies published using network meta-analyses (NMAs) has rapidly increased, and there have been continued advancements to further advance this analysis approach. Due to the fast moving and changing landscape in the infancy of NMA methodology, there is a lack of consistency and standardization for this approach. This article aims to summarize the crucial components of an NMA for both future readers, and for potential NMA authors.

Recent findings: Key components of NMAs include, but are not limited to, reporting the proposed analysis methods, assessment of risk of bias within the included studies, reporting the overall quality of the available evidence, and defining the parameters in which the results will be presented. Although NMA allows for a comprehensive evaluation of all available treatment options for a given condition, we believe that there is importance in ensuring clear understanding and appropriate interpretation of results to inform clinical practice.

Summary: While many components of NMA mirror those of traditional pairwise meta-analysis, there are many novel methodologies that are specific to this approach. It is imperative that future NMAs follow guidance from key methodology groups, as these provide valuable tools for conducting and reporting NMAs.

让眼科医生了解网络荟萃分析方法。
综述的目的:在过去的十年中,使用网络荟萃分析(NMA)发表的研究数量迅速增加,而且这种分析方法也在不断进步。由于网络荟萃分析方法处于起步阶段,发展迅速且不断变化,因此这种方法缺乏一致性和标准化。本文旨在为未来的读者和潜在的 NMA 作者总结 NMA 的关键组成部分:NMA 的关键组成部分包括但不限于:报告建议的分析方法、评估纳入研究的偏倚风险、报告现有证据的总体质量以及定义结果展示的参数。虽然 NMA 允许对特定病症的所有可用治疗方案进行全面评估,但我们认为确保清楚理解和适当解释结果以指导临床实践非常重要。未来的 NMA 必须遵循主要方法学团体的指导,因为这些团体为开展和报告 NMA 提供了宝贵的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Ophthalmology is an indispensable resource featuring key up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. With renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Ophthalmology delivers a fresh insight into topics such as glaucoma, refractive surgery and corneal and external disorders. With ten sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, clinicians and other healthcare professionals alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信