The 13C Glucose Breath Test Accurately Identifies Insulin Resistance in People With Type 1 Diabetes.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Jonathan Mertens, Laurence Roosens, Rie Braspenning, Joeri Vandebeeck, Sven Francque, Christophe De Block
{"title":"The 13C Glucose Breath Test Accurately Identifies Insulin Resistance in People With Type 1 Diabetes.","authors":"Jonathan Mertens, Laurence Roosens, Rie Braspenning, Joeri Vandebeeck, Sven Francque, Christophe De Block","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgae175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated whether the delta-over-baseline of exhaled 13CO2 (Δ13CO2), generated from a 13C glucose breath test (13C-GBT), measured insulin resistance (IR) in people with type 1 diabetes, using the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (HEC) as a reference method. The secondary objective was to compare the 13C-GBT with the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 40 mU/m2/min HEC and 2 separate 13C-GBTs (euglycemic with insulin bolus and hyperglycemic without bolus) were consecutively performed in 44 adults with type 1 diabetes with varying body compositions. eGDR was calculated based on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), presence of hypertension, and waist circumference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean glucose disposal rate (M-value) was 5.9 ± 3.1 mg/kg/min and mean euglycemic Δ13CO2 was 6.4 ± 2.1 δ‰, while median eGDR was 5.9 [4.3-9.8] mg/kg/min. The hyperglycemic Δ13CO2 did not correlate with the M-value, while the euglycemic Δ13CO2 and the M-value correlated strongly (r = 0.74, P < .001). The correlation between M-value and eGDR was more moderate (Spearman's rho = 0.63, P < .001). Linear regression showed an association between Δ13CO2 and M-value, adjusted for age, sex, and HbA1c ]adjusted R² = 0.52, B = 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) .80-1.52, P < .001]. The area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve for Δ13CO2 to identify subjects with IR (M-value < 4.9 mg/kg/min) was 0.81 (95% CI .68-.94, P < .001). The optimal cut-off for Δ13CO2 to identify subjects with IR was ≤ 5.8 δ‰.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under euglycemic conditions, the 13C-GBT accurately identified individuals with type 1 diabetes and concurrent IR, suggesting its potential as a valuable noninvasive index. Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT04623320.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"e432-e442"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated whether the delta-over-baseline of exhaled 13CO2 (Δ13CO2), generated from a 13C glucose breath test (13C-GBT), measured insulin resistance (IR) in people with type 1 diabetes, using the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (HEC) as a reference method. The secondary objective was to compare the 13C-GBT with the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR).

Methods: A 40 mU/m2/min HEC and 2 separate 13C-GBTs (euglycemic with insulin bolus and hyperglycemic without bolus) were consecutively performed in 44 adults with type 1 diabetes with varying body compositions. eGDR was calculated based on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), presence of hypertension, and waist circumference.

Results: The mean glucose disposal rate (M-value) was 5.9 ± 3.1 mg/kg/min and mean euglycemic Δ13CO2 was 6.4 ± 2.1 δ‰, while median eGDR was 5.9 [4.3-9.8] mg/kg/min. The hyperglycemic Δ13CO2 did not correlate with the M-value, while the euglycemic Δ13CO2 and the M-value correlated strongly (r = 0.74, P < .001). The correlation between M-value and eGDR was more moderate (Spearman's rho = 0.63, P < .001). Linear regression showed an association between Δ13CO2 and M-value, adjusted for age, sex, and HbA1c ]adjusted R² = 0.52, B = 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) .80-1.52, P < .001]. The area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve for Δ13CO2 to identify subjects with IR (M-value < 4.9 mg/kg/min) was 0.81 (95% CI .68-.94, P < .001). The optimal cut-off for Δ13CO2 to identify subjects with IR was ≤ 5.8 δ‰.

Conclusion: Under euglycemic conditions, the 13C-GBT accurately identified individuals with type 1 diabetes and concurrent IR, suggesting its potential as a valuable noninvasive index. Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT04623320.

13C 葡萄糖呼气试验可准确识别 1 型糖尿病患者的胰岛素抵抗。
研究目的本研究以高胰岛素血糖钳夹法(HEC)为参考方法,探讨13C葡萄糖呼气试验(13C-GBT)产生的呼出13CO2(Δ13CO2)与基线相比的δ值是否能测量1型糖尿病患者的胰岛素抵抗(IR)。次要目的是比较 13C-GBT 和估计葡萄糖排出率 (eGDR):方法:对 44 名不同体质的 1 型糖尿病成人连续进行 40 mU/m2/min HEC 和两次独立的 13C-GBT 试验(胰岛素栓剂的优降糖试验和无胰岛素栓剂的高血糖试验),根据 HbA1c、是否患有高血压和腰围计算 eGDR:平均 M 值为 5.9 ± 3.1 mg/kg/min,平均血糖Δ13CO2 为 6.4 ± 2.1 δ,而 eGDR 中位数为 5.9 [4.3 - 9.8] mg/kg/min。高血糖Δ13CO2 与 M 值不相关,而优血糖Δ13CO2 与 M 值密切相关(r = 0.74,p < 0.001)。M 值和 eGDR 之间的相关性较弱(Spearman's rho = 0.63,p < 0.001)。线性回归显示,经年龄、性别和 HbA1c 调整后,Δ13CO2 与 M 值之间存在关联(调整后 R² = 0.52,B = 1.16,95% CI 0.80 - 1.52,p <0.001)。Δ13CO2用于识别IR受试者(M值< 4.9 mg/kg/min)的AUROC为0.81(95% CI 0.68 - 0.94,p < 0.001)。Δ13CO2确定IR受试者的最佳临界值为≤5.8δ‰:结论:在优血糖条件下,13C-GBT 能准确识别 1 型糖尿病患者和并发 IR 的个体,这表明 13C-GBT 有潜力成为一种有价值的非侵入性指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信