Anti-hypertensive therapy for preeclampsia: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hypertension in Pregnancy Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1080/10641955.2024.2329068
Ting Wang, Ruoan Jiang, Yingsha Yao, Ting Xu, Na Li
{"title":"Anti-hypertensive therapy for preeclampsia: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.","authors":"Ting Wang, Ruoan Jiang, Yingsha Yao, Ting Xu, Na Li","doi":"10.1080/10641955.2024.2329068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy disorder that represents a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This network meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO. We searched the PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov. and Embase databases for studies published from inception to the 31<sup>st</sup> of March 2023. RevMan5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for direct meta-analysis (DMA) statistical analysis. Funnel maps, network meta-analysis (NMA), the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to rank the different interventions and publication bias were generated by STATA 17.0 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1192 women with PE; two studies were of high quality and six were of moderate quality. Eight interventions were addressed in the NMA. In the DMA, we found that blood pressure in the Ketanserin group were significantly higher than those in the Nicardipine group. NMA showed that blood pressure in the Dihydralazine group was significantly higher than that in the Methyldopa, Labetalol, Nicardipine and Diltiazem groups. And the blood pressure in the Labetalol group was significantly lower than that in the Nicardipine group. SUCRA values showed that Diltiazem was more effective in lowering blood pressure than other drugs looked at in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the eight RCTs included in this study, Diltiazem was the most effective in reducing blood pressure in PE patients; Labetalol and Nicardipine also had good effects. Diltiazem is preferred for the treatment of patients with severe PE and high blood pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":13054,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension in Pregnancy","volume":"43 1","pages":"2329068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension in Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641955.2024.2329068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy disorder that represents a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Methods: This network meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO. We searched the PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov. and Embase databases for studies published from inception to the 31st of March 2023. RevMan5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for direct meta-analysis (DMA) statistical analysis. Funnel maps, network meta-analysis (NMA), the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to rank the different interventions and publication bias were generated by STATA 17.0 software.

Results: We included eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1192 women with PE; two studies were of high quality and six were of moderate quality. Eight interventions were addressed in the NMA. In the DMA, we found that blood pressure in the Ketanserin group were significantly higher than those in the Nicardipine group. NMA showed that blood pressure in the Dihydralazine group was significantly higher than that in the Methyldopa, Labetalol, Nicardipine and Diltiazem groups. And the blood pressure in the Labetalol group was significantly lower than that in the Nicardipine group. SUCRA values showed that Diltiazem was more effective in lowering blood pressure than other drugs looked at in this study.

Conclusion: According to the eight RCTs included in this study, Diltiazem was the most effective in reducing blood pressure in PE patients; Labetalol and Nicardipine also had good effects. Diltiazem is preferred for the treatment of patients with severe PE and high blood pressure.

子痫前期的抗高血压治疗:网络荟萃分析和系统综述。
背景:子痫前期(PE子痫前期(PE)是一种妊娠疾病,是孕产妇和围产期发病率和死亡率的主要原因:本网络荟萃分析已在 PROSPERO 注册。我们在 PubMed、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Embase 数据库中检索了从开始到 2023 年 3 月 31 日发表的研究。使用科克伦协作组织提供的 RevMan5.3 软件进行直接荟萃分析(DMA)统计分析。用STATA 17.0软件生成漏斗图、网络荟萃分析(NMA)、累积排序曲线下表面(SUCRA)对不同干预措施进行排序以及发表偏倚:我们纳入了 8 项随机对照试验 (RCT),共涉及 1192 名患 PE 的妇女;其中 2 项研究质量较高,6 项研究质量中等。在 NMA 中涉及了八项干预措施。在 DMA 中,我们发现酮塞林组的血压明显高于尼卡地平组。NMA 显示,双肼屈嗪组的血压明显高于甲基多巴、拉贝洛尔、尼卡地平和地尔硫卓组。拉贝洛尔组的血压明显低于尼卡地平组。SUCRA 值显示,与本研究中的其他药物相比,地尔硫卓的降压效果更好:结论:根据本研究纳入的 8 项 RCT,地尔硫卓是降低 PE 患者血压的最有效药物;拉贝洛尔和尼卡地平也有很好的效果。地尔硫卓是治疗严重 PE 和高血压患者的首选药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hypertension in Pregnancy
Hypertension in Pregnancy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension in Pregnancy is a refereed journal in the English language which publishes data pertaining to human and animal hypertension during gestation. Contributions concerning physiology of circulatory control, pathophysiology, methodology, therapy or any other material relevant to the relationship between elevated blood pressure and pregnancy are acceptable. Published material includes original articles, clinical trials, solicited and unsolicited reviews, editorials, letters, and other material deemed pertinent by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信