{"title":"Identification of Potential Blood-Based Biomarkers for Frailty by Using an Integrative Approach.","authors":"Mutsumi Suganuma, Motoki Furutani, Tohru Hosoyama, Risa Mitsumori, Rei Otsuka, Marie Takemura, Yasumoto Matsui, Yukiko Nakano, Shumpei Niida, Kouichi Ozaki, Shosuke Satake, Daichi Shigemizu","doi":"10.1159/000538313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although frailty is a geriatric syndrome that is associated with disability, hospitalization, and mortality, it can be reversible and preventable with the appropriate interventions. Additionally, as the current diagnostic criteria for frailty include only physical, psychological, cognitive, and social measurements, there is a need for promising blood-based molecular biomarkers to aid in the diagnosis of frailty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify candidate blood-based biomarkers that can enhance current diagnosis of frailty, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of clinical data, messenger RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), and aging-related factors using a total of 104 older adults aged 65-90 years (61 frail subjects and 43 robust subjects) in a cross-sectional case-control study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified two candidate biomarkers of frailty from the clinical data analysis, nine from the RNA-seq analysis, and six from the aging-related factors analysis. By using combinations of the candidate biomarkers and clinical information, we constructed risk prediction models. The best models used combinations that included skeletal muscle mass index measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (adjusted p = 0.026), GDF15 (adjusted p = 1.46E-03), adiponectin (adjusted p = 0.012), CXCL9 (adjusted p = 0.011), or apelin (adjusted p = 0.020) as the biomarker. These models achieved a high area under the curve of 0.95 in an independent validation cohort (95% confidence interval: 0.79-0.97). Our risk prediction models showed significantly higher areas under the curve than did models constructed using only basic clinical information (Welch's t test p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All five biomarkers showed statistically significant correlations with components of the frailty diagnostic criteria. We discovered several potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of frailty. Further refinement may lead to their future clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12662,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"630-638"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538313","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Although frailty is a geriatric syndrome that is associated with disability, hospitalization, and mortality, it can be reversible and preventable with the appropriate interventions. Additionally, as the current diagnostic criteria for frailty include only physical, psychological, cognitive, and social measurements, there is a need for promising blood-based molecular biomarkers to aid in the diagnosis of frailty.
Methods: To identify candidate blood-based biomarkers that can enhance current diagnosis of frailty, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of clinical data, messenger RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), and aging-related factors using a total of 104 older adults aged 65-90 years (61 frail subjects and 43 robust subjects) in a cross-sectional case-control study.
Results: We identified two candidate biomarkers of frailty from the clinical data analysis, nine from the RNA-seq analysis, and six from the aging-related factors analysis. By using combinations of the candidate biomarkers and clinical information, we constructed risk prediction models. The best models used combinations that included skeletal muscle mass index measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (adjusted p = 0.026), GDF15 (adjusted p = 1.46E-03), adiponectin (adjusted p = 0.012), CXCL9 (adjusted p = 0.011), or apelin (adjusted p = 0.020) as the biomarker. These models achieved a high area under the curve of 0.95 in an independent validation cohort (95% confidence interval: 0.79-0.97). Our risk prediction models showed significantly higher areas under the curve than did models constructed using only basic clinical information (Welch's t test p < 0.001).
Conclusion: All five biomarkers showed statistically significant correlations with components of the frailty diagnostic criteria. We discovered several potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of frailty. Further refinement may lead to their future clinical use.
导言:虽然虚弱是一种与残疾、住院和死亡率相关的老年综合症,但如果采取适当的干预措施,虚弱是可以逆转和预防的。此外,由于目前的虚弱诊断标准仅包括身体、心理、认知和社会测量,因此需要有前景的血液分子生物标志物来帮助诊断虚弱:为了确定能加强目前虚弱诊断的候选血液生物标志物,我们在一项横断面病例对照研究中,对104名65-90岁的老年人(61名虚弱受试者和43名健康受试者)的临床数据、信使RNA测序(RNA-seq)和衰老相关因素进行了综合分析:结果:我们从临床数据分析中确定了两个虚弱的候选生物标志物,从 RNA-seq 分析中确定了九个,从衰老相关因素分析中确定了六个。利用候选生物标志物和临床信息的组合,我们构建了风险预测模型。最佳模型使用的生物标志物组合包括通过双能 X 射线吸收测量的骨骼肌质量指数(调整后 p = 0.026)、GDF15(调整后 p = 1.46E-03)、脂肪连素(调整后 p = 0.012)、CXCL9(调整后 p = 0.011)或 Apelin(调整后 p = 0.020)。这些模型在独立验证队列中的曲线下面积高达 0.95(95% 置信区间:0.79-0.97)。我们的风险预测模型的曲线下面积明显高于仅使用基本临床信息构建的模型(韦尔奇 t 检验 p < 0.001):结论:所有五种生物标志物都与虚弱诊断标准的组成部分存在统计学意义上的显著相关性。我们发现了几种潜在的虚弱诊断生物标志物。进一步的改进可能会使它们在未来应用于临床。
期刊介绍:
In view of the ever-increasing fraction of elderly people, understanding the mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases has become a matter of urgent necessity. ''Gerontology'', the oldest journal in the field, responds to this need by drawing topical contributions from multiple disciplines to support the fundamental goals of extending active life and enhancing its quality. The range of papers is classified into four sections. In the Clinical Section, the aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of agerelated diseases are discussed from a gerontological rather than a geriatric viewpoint. The Experimental Section contains up-to-date contributions from basic gerontological research. Papers dealing with behavioural development and related topics are placed in the Behavioural Science Section. Basic aspects of regeneration in different experimental biological systems as well as in the context of medical applications are dealt with in a special section that also contains information on technological advances for the elderly. Providing a primary source of high-quality papers covering all aspects of aging in humans and animals, ''Gerontology'' serves as an ideal information tool for all readers interested in the topic of aging from a broad perspective.