A systematic review of the cognitive effects of the COMT inhibitor, tolcapone, in adult humans.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CNS Spectrums Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1017/S1092852924000130
Emilia Kings, Konstantinos Ioannidis, Jon E Grant, Samuel R Chamberlain
{"title":"A systematic review of the cognitive effects of the COMT inhibitor, tolcapone, in adult humans.","authors":"Emilia Kings, Konstantinos Ioannidis, Jon E Grant, Samuel R Chamberlain","doi":"10.1017/S1092852924000130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The catechol-<i>o</i>-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor tolcapone constitutes a potentially useful probe of frontal cortical dopaminergic function. The aim of this systematic review was to examine what is known of effects of tolcapone on human cognition in randomized controlled studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study protocol was preregistered on the Open Science Framework. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials examining the effects of tolcapone on human cognition. Identified articles were then screened against inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 22 full-text papers identified, 13 randomized control trials were found to fit the pre-specified criteria. The most consistent finding was that tolcapone modulated working memory; however, the direction of effect appeared to be contingent on the COMT polymorphism (more consistent evidence of improvement in Val-Val participants). There were insufficient nature and number of studies for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cognitive improvements identified upon tolcapone administration, in some studies, are likely to be due to the level of dopamine in the prefrontal cortex being shifted closer to its optimum, per an inverted U model of prefrontal function. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the small numbers of studies. Given the centrality of cortical dopamine to understanding human cognition, studies using tolcapone in larger samples and across a broader set of cognitive domains would be valuable. It would also be useful to explore the effects of different dosing regimens (different doses; and single versus repeated administration).</p>","PeriodicalId":10505,"journal":{"name":"CNS Spectrums","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Spectrums","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852924000130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor tolcapone constitutes a potentially useful probe of frontal cortical dopaminergic function. The aim of this systematic review was to examine what is known of effects of tolcapone on human cognition in randomized controlled studies.

Methods: The study protocol was preregistered on the Open Science Framework. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials examining the effects of tolcapone on human cognition. Identified articles were then screened against inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: Of the 22 full-text papers identified, 13 randomized control trials were found to fit the pre-specified criteria. The most consistent finding was that tolcapone modulated working memory; however, the direction of effect appeared to be contingent on the COMT polymorphism (more consistent evidence of improvement in Val-Val participants). There were insufficient nature and number of studies for meta-analysis.

Conclusion: The cognitive improvements identified upon tolcapone administration, in some studies, are likely to be due to the level of dopamine in the prefrontal cortex being shifted closer to its optimum, per an inverted U model of prefrontal function. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the small numbers of studies. Given the centrality of cortical dopamine to understanding human cognition, studies using tolcapone in larger samples and across a broader set of cognitive domains would be valuable. It would also be useful to explore the effects of different dosing regimens (different doses; and single versus repeated administration).

关于 COMT 抑制剂托卡朋对成年人认知能力影响的系统性综述。
研究目的儿茶酚-邻甲基转移酶(COMT)抑制剂托卡朋可能是额叶皮质多巴胺能功能的一种有效探查手段。本系统综述旨在研究随机对照研究中托卡朋对人类认知的影响:研究方案已在开放科学框架上预先注册。我们使用PubMed进行了系统综述,以确定研究托卡朋对人类认知影响的相关随机对照试验。然后根据纳入和排除标准对确定的文章进行筛选:在确定的 22 篇全文论文中,有 13 项随机对照试验符合预先规定的标准。最一致的发现是托卡朋对工作记忆有调节作用;但是,作用的方向似乎取决于 COMT 多态性(Val-Val 参与者的改善证据更一致)。研究的性质和数量不足以进行荟萃分析:结论:根据前额叶功能的倒 "U "型模型,某些研究发现服用托卡朋后认知能力有所改善,这可能是由于前额叶皮质中的多巴胺水平更接近其最佳值。然而,由于研究数量较少,对结果的解释应谨慎。鉴于皮质多巴胺在理解人类认知方面的核心作用,在更大样本和更广泛的认知领域中使用托卡朋进行研究将是非常有价值的。此外,探讨不同给药方案(不同剂量;单次给药与重复给药)的效果也很有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CNS Spectrums
CNS Spectrums 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
239
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CNS Spectrums covers all aspects of the clinical neurosciences, neurotherapeutics, and neuropsychopharmacology, particularly those pertinent to the clinician and clinical investigator. The journal features focused, in-depth reviews, perspectives, and original research articles. New therapeutics of all types in psychiatry, mental health, and neurology are emphasized, especially first in man studies, proof of concept studies, and translational basic neuroscience studies. Subject coverage spans the full spectrum of neuropsychiatry, focusing on those crossing traditional boundaries between neurology and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信