The impact of access to agricultural advisory services on input use and farm performance: Evidence from Senegal

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Aymeric Ricome, Amy Faye, Cheickh S. Fall, Sergio Gomez-y-Paloma
{"title":"The impact of access to agricultural advisory services on input use and farm performance: Evidence from Senegal","authors":"Aymeric Ricome, Amy Faye, Cheickh S. Fall, Sergio Gomez-y-Paloma","doi":"10.1002/agr.21932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performant agricultural advisory services (AAS) in Africa are crucial for improving the agricultural productivity and food security of the farm households. Yet, evidence-based study on the impacts of AAS on farm performance are scarce, especially in West African countries. This study evaluates the impact of access to AAS on input use and farm performance in Senegal, employing the instrumental variable and control function approaches accounting for selection bias. The approaches are also employed to several sub-samples to see if the impacts are heterogeneous across crop types and fertilizer use, and matching techniques are applied to test the robustness of the results. Results show that the highest positive impact of AAS is on yield, while the impacts on gross margin and improved seeds uptake are very modest. Access to AAS has no effect on fertilizer uptake. It also finds that AAS impacts positively cereal production and farmers using no fertilizer but has no effect on the legume and horticultural crop production and on farmers using fertilizer. Given the Senegalese government and donors have put a lot of effort into developing an efficient AAS system, a consideration of the identified weaknesses is required to improve its efficiency. [EconLit Citations: Q12, Q16]","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Performant agricultural advisory services (AAS) in Africa are crucial for improving the agricultural productivity and food security of the farm households. Yet, evidence-based study on the impacts of AAS on farm performance are scarce, especially in West African countries. This study evaluates the impact of access to AAS on input use and farm performance in Senegal, employing the instrumental variable and control function approaches accounting for selection bias. The approaches are also employed to several sub-samples to see if the impacts are heterogeneous across crop types and fertilizer use, and matching techniques are applied to test the robustness of the results. Results show that the highest positive impact of AAS is on yield, while the impacts on gross margin and improved seeds uptake are very modest. Access to AAS has no effect on fertilizer uptake. It also finds that AAS impacts positively cereal production and farmers using no fertilizer but has no effect on the legume and horticultural crop production and on farmers using fertilizer. Given the Senegalese government and donors have put a lot of effort into developing an efficient AAS system, a consideration of the identified weaknesses is required to improve its efficiency. [EconLit Citations: Q12, Q16]
获得农业咨询服务对投入品使用和农场绩效的影响:塞内加尔的证据
在非洲,有效的农业咨询服务(AAS)对于提高农业生产率和农户的粮食安全至关重要。然而,有关农业咨询服务对农场绩效影响的循证研究却很少,尤其是在西非国家。本研究采用工具变量法和控制函数法(考虑了选择偏差),评估了塞内加尔获得农业支持服务对投入品使用和农场绩效的影响。此外,还对若干子样本采用了这些方法,以了解不同作物类型和化肥使用情况下的影响是否存在差异,并采用匹配技术来检验结果的稳健性。结果表明,农田灌溉服务对产量的积极影响最大,而对毛利和改良种子使用率的影响则非常有限。获得农田灌溉服务对化肥使用量没有影响。研究还发现,农田灌溉服务对谷物生产和不使用化肥的农民有积极影响,但对豆类和园艺作物生产以及使用化肥的农民没有影响。鉴于塞内加尔政府和捐助方为发展高效的农业支持系统付出了大量努力,因此需要考虑已发现的不足之处,以提高其效率。[经济文献引用:问题 12、问题 16]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信