Prevalence of psychosocial interventions for pediatric dog bite injury: Is the bark actually worse than the bite?

IF 1.7 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Kelli N. Patterson, Tran Bourgeois, LeeAnn Wurster, Sarah N. VerLee, Lindsay A. Gil, Kyle Z. Horvath, Peter C. Minneci, Katherine J. Deans, Rajan K. Thakkar, Dana Schwartz
{"title":"Prevalence of psychosocial interventions for pediatric dog bite injury: Is the bark actually worse than the bite?","authors":"Kelli N. Patterson, Tran Bourgeois, LeeAnn Wurster, Sarah N. VerLee, Lindsay A. Gil, Kyle Z. Horvath, Peter C. Minneci, Katherine J. Deans, Rajan K. Thakkar, Dana Schwartz","doi":"10.1007/s40653-024-00619-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Long-term psychological effects may occur after childhood dog bite injuries. We performed a national survey to assess psychosocial interventions for children presenting with dog bite injuries to pediatric trauma centers.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A 26-question, online survey was administered to Pediatric Trauma Program Managers in the United States (<i>n</i> = 83). The survey queried whether institutions provide directed psychosocial interventions to pediatric dog bite injury patients in the Emergency Department, inpatient, or outpatient settings and the types of interventions being used. Descriptive statistics were performed to demonstrate survey results.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In total, 28 American College of Surgeons or State-verified Pediatric Trauma Centers responded to the survey (<i>n</i> = 28/83, 34%). Of the respondents, 18 (64.3%) did not have any interventions in place to address the psychosocial effects of pediatric patients’ dog bite injuries. Of the 10 (35.7%) institutions with interventions in place, the types of psychosocial resources offered included: automated order sets within the electronic medical record, specialized teams that assess the patient while hospitalized or outpatient, child psychology referrals initiated at discharge, pet therapy, and trauma resiliency programs.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Most institutions surveyed did not have protocols or interventions in place to address psychosocial disturbances in children with dog bite injuries. We provide the example of our institution’s practice, in which automatic psychology consults are placed for every child who is admitted with a dog bite injury. Performing caregiver education in the emergency department, providing caregivers with regional psychosocial resources, and communicating with a child’s pediatrician may promote the necessary standardized psychological screening and/or follow up of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":44763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-024-00619-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Long-term psychological effects may occur after childhood dog bite injuries. We performed a national survey to assess psychosocial interventions for children presenting with dog bite injuries to pediatric trauma centers.

Methods

A 26-question, online survey was administered to Pediatric Trauma Program Managers in the United States (n = 83). The survey queried whether institutions provide directed psychosocial interventions to pediatric dog bite injury patients in the Emergency Department, inpatient, or outpatient settings and the types of interventions being used. Descriptive statistics were performed to demonstrate survey results.

Results

In total, 28 American College of Surgeons or State-verified Pediatric Trauma Centers responded to the survey (n = 28/83, 34%). Of the respondents, 18 (64.3%) did not have any interventions in place to address the psychosocial effects of pediatric patients’ dog bite injuries. Of the 10 (35.7%) institutions with interventions in place, the types of psychosocial resources offered included: automated order sets within the electronic medical record, specialized teams that assess the patient while hospitalized or outpatient, child psychology referrals initiated at discharge, pet therapy, and trauma resiliency programs.

Conclusion

Most institutions surveyed did not have protocols or interventions in place to address psychosocial disturbances in children with dog bite injuries. We provide the example of our institution’s practice, in which automatic psychology consults are placed for every child who is admitted with a dog bite injury. Performing caregiver education in the emergency department, providing caregivers with regional psychosocial resources, and communicating with a child’s pediatrician may promote the necessary standardized psychological screening and/or follow up of these patients.

对小儿被狗咬伤进行社会心理干预的普遍性:狗叫是否比咬伤更可怕?
目的 儿童被狗咬伤后可能会产生长期的心理影响。我们进行了一项全国性调查,以评估儿科创伤中心对被狗咬伤的儿童采取的社会心理干预措施。方法:我们对美国的儿科创伤项目管理人员(n = 83)进行了一项包含 26 个问题的在线调查。调查询问了各机构是否为急诊科、住院部或门诊部的小儿被狗咬伤患者提供指导性社会心理干预,以及所使用干预的类型。结果共有 28 家美国外科医生学会或国家认可的儿科创伤中心对调查做出了回应(n = 28/83,34%)。其中,18 家(64.3%)没有针对儿科患者被狗咬伤后的社会心理影响采取任何干预措施。在 10 家(35.7%)已采取干预措施的机构中,所提供的社会心理资源类型包括:电子病历中的自动医嘱集、在住院或门诊期间对患者进行评估的专业团队、出院时启动的儿童心理转介、宠物疗法和创伤恢复计划。我们举例说明了我们机构的做法,即为每名被狗咬伤的入院儿童安排自动心理咨询。在急诊科对看护者进行教育,为看护者提供地区性的心理社会资源,并与儿童的儿科医生进行沟通,可以促进对这些患者进行必要的标准化心理筛查和/或随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Underpinned by a biopsychosocial approach, the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma presents original research and prevention and treatment strategies for understanding and dealing with symptoms and disorders related to the psychological effects of trauma experienced by children and adolescents during childhood and where the impact of these experiences continues into adulthood. The journal also examines intervention models directed toward the individual, family, and community, new theoretical models and approaches, and public policy proposals and innovations. In addition, the journal promotes rigorous investigation and debate on the human capacity for agency, resilience and longer-term healing in the face of child and adolescent trauma. With a multidisciplinary approach that draws input from the psychological, medical, social work, sociological, public health, legal and education fields, the journal features research, intervention approaches and evidence-based programs, theoretical articles, specific review articles, brief reports and case studies, and commentaries on current and/or controversial topics. The journal also encourages submissions from less heard voices, for example in terms of geography, minority status or service user perspectives. Among the topics examined in the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma: The effects of childhood maltreatment Loss, natural disasters, and political conflict Exposure to or victimization from family or community violence Racial, ethnic, gender, sexual orientation or class discrimination Physical injury, diseases, and painful or debilitating medical treatments The impact of poverty, social deprivation and inequality Barriers and facilitators on pathways to recovery The Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma is an important resource for practitioners, policymakers, researchers, and academics whose work is centered on children exposed to traumatic events and adults exposed to traumatic events as children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信