Transitioning to college: Testing cognitive bias modification for interpretations as an inoculation tool for social anxiety in college first-years

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Sarah E. Dreyer-Oren , Akanksha Das , Rachel B. Geyer , Robert E. Fite , Elizabeth J. Kiel , Elise M. Clerkin
{"title":"Transitioning to college: Testing cognitive bias modification for interpretations as an inoculation tool for social anxiety in college first-years","authors":"Sarah E. Dreyer-Oren ,&nbsp;Akanksha Das ,&nbsp;Rachel B. Geyer ,&nbsp;Robert E. Fite ,&nbsp;Elizabeth J. Kiel ,&nbsp;Elise M. Clerkin","doi":"10.1016/j.jbtep.2024.101961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Reducing social anxiety development among incoming college students may improve college adjustment and mental health outcomes. This study tested whether cognitive bias modification for interpretations (CBM-I) reduces social anxiety and increases adjustment during the transition to college, and whether changes in outcomes would be mediated by changes in interpretation biases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants (N = 73) were randomly assigned to a 3-session weekly CBM-I condition or symptom tracking (ST) control condition. Multilevel models were used to estimate within-person trajectories from baseline to one week post-intervention and to test whether trajectories differed by condition.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Those in the CBM-I condition (vs. ST) reported higher increases in social adjustment across time. There were not significant differences between conditions for changes in social anxiety, academic adjustment, and personal adjustment. CBM-I was indirectly linked to improvements in outcome variables via more adaptive interpretation biases.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>CBM-I was administered in a laboratory setting, requiring more resources than some computerized interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Data tentatively support CBM-I for first-year students to increase social adjustment. Further, mediation findings provide support for targeting interpretation biases to improve social anxiety and adjustment outcomes. Yet, CBM-I did not outperform ST in improving social anxiety symptoms or other areas of college adjustment, and effect sizes were small, suggesting that more work is needed to amplify the potential of CBM-I as a therapeutic tool.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101961"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000579162400020X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

Reducing social anxiety development among incoming college students may improve college adjustment and mental health outcomes. This study tested whether cognitive bias modification for interpretations (CBM-I) reduces social anxiety and increases adjustment during the transition to college, and whether changes in outcomes would be mediated by changes in interpretation biases.

Methods

Participants (N = 73) were randomly assigned to a 3-session weekly CBM-I condition or symptom tracking (ST) control condition. Multilevel models were used to estimate within-person trajectories from baseline to one week post-intervention and to test whether trajectories differed by condition.

Results

Those in the CBM-I condition (vs. ST) reported higher increases in social adjustment across time. There were not significant differences between conditions for changes in social anxiety, academic adjustment, and personal adjustment. CBM-I was indirectly linked to improvements in outcome variables via more adaptive interpretation biases.

Limitations

CBM-I was administered in a laboratory setting, requiring more resources than some computerized interventions.

Conclusions

Data tentatively support CBM-I for first-year students to increase social adjustment. Further, mediation findings provide support for targeting interpretation biases to improve social anxiety and adjustment outcomes. Yet, CBM-I did not outperform ST in improving social anxiety symptoms or other areas of college adjustment, and effect sizes were small, suggesting that more work is needed to amplify the potential of CBM-I as a therapeutic tool.

向大学过渡:测试将认知偏差修正解释作为预防大学一年级学生社交焦虑的工具
背景和目的减轻大学新生的社交焦虑可能会改善大学适应和心理健康结果。本研究测试了解释性认知偏差修正(CBM-I)是否能减少大学过渡期间的社交焦虑并提高适应性,以及结果的变化是否会受到解释性偏差变化的影响。方法将参与者(N = 73)随机分配到每周 3 节课的 CBM-I 条件下或症状跟踪(ST)对照条件下。使用多层次模型估算从基线到干预后一周的人内轨迹,并检验不同条件下的轨迹是否存在差异。结果CBM-I 条件(与 ST 条件相比)下的参与者在不同时间段的社会适应能力提高幅度更大。在社交焦虑、学业适应性和个人适应性的变化方面,不同条件下的差异并不明显。局限性CBM-I是在实验室环境中进行的,与某些计算机化干预相比需要更多的资源。此外,调解结果为针对解释偏差改善社交焦虑和适应结果提供了支持。然而,CBM-I 在改善社交焦虑症状或大学适应的其他方面的效果并没有优于 ST,而且效果大小很小,这表明还需要做更多的工作来扩大 CBM-I 作为治疗工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The publication of the book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1958) by the co-founding editor of this Journal, Joseph Wolpe, marked a major change in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. The book used principles from empirical behavioral science to explain psychopathological phenomena and the resulting explanations were critically tested and used to derive effective treatments. The second half of the 20th century saw this rigorous scientific approach come to fruition. Experimental approaches to psychopathology, in particular those used to test conditioning theories and cognitive theories, have steadily expanded, and experimental analysis of processes characterising and maintaining mental disorders have become an established research area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信