Survey of Using Oral Anticoagulants in Patient with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Bui The Dung, Nguyen Thanh Hien, Tran Hoa, Cao Ngoc Mai Han
{"title":"Survey of Using Oral Anticoagulants in Patient with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Bui The Dung, Nguyen Thanh Hien, Tran Hoa, Cao Ngoc Mai Han","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2024.78.16-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Vietnam, there has been no survey conducted on the prescribing and monitoring practices of oral anticoagulants to ensure that patients with atrial fibrillation receive appropriate. Objective: Therefore, we conducted this research to clarify the aforementioned issue in our hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a cross-sectional study by reviewing outpatient electronic medical records at the University Medical Center in Ho Chi Minh City. Our study included 1087 patients aged 18 years or older diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who visited the Cardiology clinic between January 1st, 2021, and June 30th, 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1087 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), 1036 were eligible for anticoagulant therapy. However, only 847 (81.8%) received prescriptions for either Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (n=129, 15.2%) or Non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (n=718, 84.8%). NOAC prescriptions were more commonly found in patients aged 75 or older (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=2), those with health insurance coverage (adjusted OR=2.9), and in individuals with a history of hypertension (adjusted OR=2). On the contrary, patients with a farming occupation were less likely to be prescribed NOACs (adjusted OR=0.4). About 75% of patients adhered to the guidelines recommending close monitoring during anticoagulant treatment. Notably, inappropriate prescriptions were identified in 27.7% of cases, especially among those with no recorded body weight (which is necessary for precise dosing based on creatinine clearance), those without health insurance, those with undocumented CHA2DS2-VASc scores, or those who were concurrently using antiplatelet agents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A discrepancy persists between clinical guidelines and the actual practice in diagnosing and managing patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). It is crucial to prioritize the regular reevaluation of thromboembolic risk scores at follow-up appointments, ensure strict adherence to clinical monitoring standards, and align anticoagulant medication prescriptions with established guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":94135,"journal":{"name":"Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)","volume":"78 1","pages":"16-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2024.78.16-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Vietnam, there has been no survey conducted on the prescribing and monitoring practices of oral anticoagulants to ensure that patients with atrial fibrillation receive appropriate. Objective: Therefore, we conducted this research to clarify the aforementioned issue in our hospital.

Methods: We carried out a cross-sectional study by reviewing outpatient electronic medical records at the University Medical Center in Ho Chi Minh City. Our study included 1087 patients aged 18 years or older diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who visited the Cardiology clinic between January 1st, 2021, and June 30th, 2021.

Results: Among the 1087 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), 1036 were eligible for anticoagulant therapy. However, only 847 (81.8%) received prescriptions for either Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (n=129, 15.2%) or Non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (n=718, 84.8%). NOAC prescriptions were more commonly found in patients aged 75 or older (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=2), those with health insurance coverage (adjusted OR=2.9), and in individuals with a history of hypertension (adjusted OR=2). On the contrary, patients with a farming occupation were less likely to be prescribed NOACs (adjusted OR=0.4). About 75% of patients adhered to the guidelines recommending close monitoring during anticoagulant treatment. Notably, inappropriate prescriptions were identified in 27.7% of cases, especially among those with no recorded body weight (which is necessary for precise dosing based on creatinine clearance), those without health insurance, those with undocumented CHA2DS2-VASc scores, or those who were concurrently using antiplatelet agents.

Conclusion: A discrepancy persists between clinical guidelines and the actual practice in diagnosing and managing patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). It is crucial to prioritize the regular reevaluation of thromboembolic risk scores at follow-up appointments, ensure strict adherence to clinical monitoring standards, and align anticoagulant medication prescriptions with established guidelines.

关于非瓣膜性心房颤动患者使用口服抗凝药的调查。
背景:越南尚未对口服抗凝剂的处方和监测方法进行调查,以确保心房颤动患者得到适当的治疗。研究目的因此,我们在本医院开展了这项研究,以澄清上述问题:我们通过查阅胡志明市大学医疗中心的门诊电子病历,开展了一项横断面研究。研究对象包括在 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日期间到心脏科门诊就诊的 1087 名 18 岁或以上被诊断为非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)的患者:在 1087 名非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者中,有 1036 人符合抗凝治疗条件。然而,只有 847 人(81.8%)接受了维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)(129 人,15.2%)或非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOAC)(718 人,84.8%)处方。NOAC处方更常见于75岁或以上的患者(调整后的比值比[OR]=2)、有医疗保险的患者(调整后的比值比=2.9)和有高血压病史的患者(调整后的比值比=2)。相反,从事农业职业的患者获得 NOACs 处方的可能性较低(调整后 OR=0.4)。约 75% 的患者遵守了指南中关于在抗凝治疗期间进行密切监测的建议。值得注意的是,有27.7%的病例存在处方不当的情况,尤其是那些没有记录体重的患者(根据肌酐清除率精确用药需要记录体重)、没有医疗保险的患者、CHA2DS2-VASc评分没有记录的患者或同时使用抗血小板药物的患者:结论:在诊断和管理非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者方面,临床指南与实际做法之间仍存在差异。至关重要的是,应优先考虑在复诊时定期重新评估血栓栓塞风险评分,确保严格遵守临床监测标准,并使抗凝药物处方与既定指南保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信