Ethical Challenges with the Informed Consent Process in Pediatric Research Studies.

Thabit S Alotaibi
{"title":"Ethical Challenges with the Informed Consent Process in Pediatric Research Studies.","authors":"Thabit S Alotaibi","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2024.78.65-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Informed Consent (IC) is crucial in pediatric research, aligning with the National Research Act of 1974 and the Belmont Report's principles. Current regulations, particularly 45 CFR 46, provide additional safeguards for children in research.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article explores ethical challenges in pediatric research IC, drawing from PubMed literature and regulatory guidelines to understand historical context, legislative milestones, and contemporary issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review, primarily sourced from PubMed, informed the examination of pediatric research and IC, referencing guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics and regulations from the FDA and HHS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study underscores the need for increased pediatric research due to the prevalence of drugs studied on adults. Despite legislative efforts like the FDAMA and Pediatric Research Equity Act, ethical challenges persist in obtaining IC in pediatric studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pediatric research necessitates nuanced IC approaches, involving parents, guardians, and children. Ethical challenges such as coercion and compensation require attention, with recommendations emphasizing guideline adherence and increased public engagement for trust-building and pediatric health advancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":94135,"journal":{"name":"Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)","volume":"78 1","pages":"65-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2024.78.65-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Informed Consent (IC) is crucial in pediatric research, aligning with the National Research Act of 1974 and the Belmont Report's principles. Current regulations, particularly 45 CFR 46, provide additional safeguards for children in research.

Objective: This article explores ethical challenges in pediatric research IC, drawing from PubMed literature and regulatory guidelines to understand historical context, legislative milestones, and contemporary issues.

Methods: A literature review, primarily sourced from PubMed, informed the examination of pediatric research and IC, referencing guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics and regulations from the FDA and HHS.

Results: The study underscores the need for increased pediatric research due to the prevalence of drugs studied on adults. Despite legislative efforts like the FDAMA and Pediatric Research Equity Act, ethical challenges persist in obtaining IC in pediatric studies.

Conclusion: Pediatric research necessitates nuanced IC approaches, involving parents, guardians, and children. Ethical challenges such as coercion and compensation require attention, with recommendations emphasizing guideline adherence and increased public engagement for trust-building and pediatric health advancement.

儿科研究中知情同意程序的伦理挑战。
背景:知情同意(IC)对于儿科研究至关重要,它符合 1974 年《国家研究法》和贝尔蒙特报告的原则。现行法规,尤其是美国联邦法典第 45 卷第 46 条,为研究中的儿童提供了额外的保障:本文探讨了儿科研究 IC 中的伦理挑战,从 PubMed 文献和监管指南中了解历史背景、立法里程碑和当代问题:方法:文献综述主要来自 PubMed,为儿科研究和 IC 的研究提供了信息,同时参考了美国儿科学会的指导方针以及 FDA 和 HHS 的法规:研究强调,由于成人药物研究的普遍性,因此有必要加强儿科研究。尽管美国食品及药物管理局(FDAMA)和《儿科研究公平法案》(Pediatric Research Equity Act)等立法机构做出了努力,但在儿科研究中获得IC的伦理挑战依然存在:结论:儿科研究需要细致入微的IC方法,需要家长、监护人和儿童的参与。需要关注强迫和补偿等伦理挑战,建议强调遵守指南和加强公众参与,以建立信任和促进儿科健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信