Real-world data: a comprehensive literature review on the barriers, challenges, and opportunities associated with their inclusion in the health technology assessment process.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-02-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/jpps.2024.12302
Konstantinos Zisis, Elpida Pavi, Mary Geitona, Kostas Athanasakis
{"title":"Real-world data: a comprehensive literature review on the barriers, challenges, and opportunities associated with their inclusion in the health technology assessment process.","authors":"Konstantinos Zisis, Elpida Pavi, Mary Geitona, Kostas Athanasakis","doi":"10.3389/jpps.2024.12302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This review aimed to assess the current use and acceptance of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) in health technology assessment (HTA) process. It additionally aimed to discern stakeholders' viewpoints concerning RWD and RWE in HTA and illuminate the obstacles, difficulties, prospects, and consequences associated with the incorporation of RWD and RWE into the realm of HTA. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive PRISMA-based systematic review was performed in July 2022 in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, IDEAS-RePEc, International HTA database, and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination with <i>ad hoc</i> supplementary search in Google Scholar and international organization websites. The review included pre-determined inclusion criteria while the selection of eligible studies, the data extraction process and quality assessment were carried out using standardized and transparent methods. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-nine (<i>n</i> = 29) studies were included in the review out of 2,115 studies identified by the search strategy. In various global contexts, disparities in RWD utilization were evident, with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) serving as the primary evidence source. RWD and RWE played pivotal roles, surpassing relative effectiveness assessments (REAs) and significantly influencing decision-making and cost-effectiveness analyses. Identified challenges impeding RWD integration into HTA encompassed limited local data access, complexities in non-randomized trial design, data quality, privacy, and fragmentation. Addressing these is imperative for optimal RWD utilization. Incorporating RWD/RWE in HTA yields multifaceted advantages, enhancing understanding of treatment efficacy, resource utilization, and cost analysis, particularly via patient registries. RWE complements assessments of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) and rare diseases. Local data utilization strengthens HTA, bridging gaps when RCT data is lacking. RWD aids medical device decision-making, cancer drug reassessment, and indirect treatment comparisons. Challenges include data availability, stakeholder acceptance, expertise, and privacy. However, standardization, training, collaboration, and guidance can surmount these barriers, fostering enhanced RWD utilization in HTA. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study highlights the intricate global landscape of RWD and RWE acceptance in HTA. Recognizing regional nuances, addressing methodological challenges, and promoting collaboration are pivotal, among others, for leveraging RWD and RWE effectively in healthcare decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":50090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"27 ","pages":"12302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10932954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/jpps.2024.12302","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This review aimed to assess the current use and acceptance of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) in health technology assessment (HTA) process. It additionally aimed to discern stakeholders' viewpoints concerning RWD and RWE in HTA and illuminate the obstacles, difficulties, prospects, and consequences associated with the incorporation of RWD and RWE into the realm of HTA. Methods: A comprehensive PRISMA-based systematic review was performed in July 2022 in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, IDEAS-RePEc, International HTA database, and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination with ad hoc supplementary search in Google Scholar and international organization websites. The review included pre-determined inclusion criteria while the selection of eligible studies, the data extraction process and quality assessment were carried out using standardized and transparent methods. Results: Twenty-nine (n = 29) studies were included in the review out of 2,115 studies identified by the search strategy. In various global contexts, disparities in RWD utilization were evident, with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) serving as the primary evidence source. RWD and RWE played pivotal roles, surpassing relative effectiveness assessments (REAs) and significantly influencing decision-making and cost-effectiveness analyses. Identified challenges impeding RWD integration into HTA encompassed limited local data access, complexities in non-randomized trial design, data quality, privacy, and fragmentation. Addressing these is imperative for optimal RWD utilization. Incorporating RWD/RWE in HTA yields multifaceted advantages, enhancing understanding of treatment efficacy, resource utilization, and cost analysis, particularly via patient registries. RWE complements assessments of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) and rare diseases. Local data utilization strengthens HTA, bridging gaps when RCT data is lacking. RWD aids medical device decision-making, cancer drug reassessment, and indirect treatment comparisons. Challenges include data availability, stakeholder acceptance, expertise, and privacy. However, standardization, training, collaboration, and guidance can surmount these barriers, fostering enhanced RWD utilization in HTA. Conclusion: This study highlights the intricate global landscape of RWD and RWE acceptance in HTA. Recognizing regional nuances, addressing methodological challenges, and promoting collaboration are pivotal, among others, for leveraging RWD and RWE effectively in healthcare decision-making.

真实世界数据:关于将其纳入卫生技术评估流程的障碍、挑战和机遇的综合文献综述。
目的:本综述旨在评估真实世界数据(RWD)和真实世界证据(RWE)在卫生技术评估(HTA)过程中的使用和接受程度。此外,它还旨在了解利益相关者对 HTA 中 RWD 和 RWE 的看法,并阐明将 RWD 和 RWE 纳入 HTA 领域的相关障碍、困难、前景和后果。方法:2022 年 7 月,我们在 PubMed/Medline、Scopus、IDEAS-RePEc、国际 HTA 数据库、Centre for Reviews and Dissemination 等网站上进行了基于 PRISMA 的全面系统综述,并在 Google Scholar 和国际组织网站上进行了特别补充搜索。该综述包括预先确定的纳入标准,同时采用标准化和透明的方法对符合条件的研究进行筛选、数据提取过程和质量评估。结果在搜索策略确定的 2,115 项研究中,有 29 项(n = 29)研究被纳入审查范围。在不同的全球背景下,利用随机对照试验(RCT)作为主要的证据来源,在农村妇女发展(RWD)方面存在明显的差异。RWD和RWE发挥了关键作用,超过了相对效果评估(REA),对决策和成本效益分析产生了重大影响。已确定的阻碍将 RWD 纳入 HTA 的挑战包括本地数据访问有限、非随机试验设计复杂、数据质量、隐私和分散。解决这些问题是优化利用 RWD 的当务之急。将 RWD/RWE 纳入 HTA 可带来多方面的优势,尤其是通过患者登记,可加深对治疗效果、资源利用和成本分析的了解。RWE 是对先进治疗药物产品 (ATMP) 和罕见病评估的补充。本地数据利用加强了 HTA,在缺乏 RCT 数据时弥补了差距。RWD 有助于医疗器械决策、癌症药物再评估和间接治疗比较。面临的挑战包括数据可用性、利益相关者的接受程度、专业知识和隐私。然而,标准化、培训、合作和指导可以克服这些障碍,促进在 HTA 中加强对 RWD 的利用。结论:本研究强调了在 HTA 中接受 RWD 和 RWE 的错综复杂的全球情况。要想在医疗保健决策中有效利用 RWD 和 RWE,认识地区差异、应对方法挑战和促进合作是关键所在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (JPPS) is the official journal of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences. JPPS is a broad-spectrum, peer-reviewed, international pharmaceutical journal circulated electronically via the World Wide Web. Subscription to JPPS is free of charge. Articles will appear individually as soon as they are accepted and are ready for circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信