Borderline personality disorder and stigma: Lived experience perspectives on helpful and hurtful language.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Personality and Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1002/pmh.1609
Charlotte C van Schie, Kate Lewis, Karlen R Barr, Mahlie Jewell, Natalie Malcolmson, Michelle L Townsend, Brin F S Grenyer
{"title":"Borderline personality disorder and stigma: Lived experience perspectives on helpful and hurtful language.","authors":"Charlotte C van Schie, Kate Lewis, Karlen R Barr, Mahlie Jewell, Natalie Malcolmson, Michelle L Townsend, Brin F S Grenyer","doi":"10.1002/pmh.1609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe mental health disorder that is subject to significant stigmatisation. With language being a key reinforcer of stigma, this co-produced study aims to explore the language use regarding BPD and its effect on those with BPD and carers. Recommendations to reduce stigmatisation are provided for both clinicians and researchers. Participants with BPD (consumer n = 33) and those supporting someone with BPD (carer n = 30) discussed their experience of hurtful and helpful language. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse written and verbal responses into core conflictual relationship themes (CCRT) reflecting how different words were heard and experienced. All consumers and carers in the study reported experiences with stigmatising language. Feelings of inadequacy and frustration were common amongst consumers, specifically when they perceived others as trivialising their needs or not seeing them as a unique individual. Carers often reported feelings of frustration when they perceived others as blaming them or not acknowledging their needs. Both consumers and carers reported helpful language as being connecting, validating and accepting. Unhelpful communication patterns have negative consequences for the person's self-understanding (i.e., self-stigma) and their relationships with others, including the therapeutic alliance. A consideration of these communication patterns may foster the use of reflective positive language that is compassionate and hopeful.</p>","PeriodicalId":46871,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1609","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe mental health disorder that is subject to significant stigmatisation. With language being a key reinforcer of stigma, this co-produced study aims to explore the language use regarding BPD and its effect on those with BPD and carers. Recommendations to reduce stigmatisation are provided for both clinicians and researchers. Participants with BPD (consumer n = 33) and those supporting someone with BPD (carer n = 30) discussed their experience of hurtful and helpful language. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse written and verbal responses into core conflictual relationship themes (CCRT) reflecting how different words were heard and experienced. All consumers and carers in the study reported experiences with stigmatising language. Feelings of inadequacy and frustration were common amongst consumers, specifically when they perceived others as trivialising their needs or not seeing them as a unique individual. Carers often reported feelings of frustration when they perceived others as blaming them or not acknowledging their needs. Both consumers and carers reported helpful language as being connecting, validating and accepting. Unhelpful communication patterns have negative consequences for the person's self-understanding (i.e., self-stigma) and their relationships with others, including the therapeutic alliance. A consideration of these communication patterns may foster the use of reflective positive language that is compassionate and hopeful.

边缘型人格障碍与污名化:从生活经验角度看有益和有害的语言。
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是一种严重的心理健康障碍,受到严重的污名化。由于语言是污名化的一个关键强化因素,这项共同制作的研究旨在探讨有关 BPD 的语言使用及其对 BPD 患者和照护者的影响。为临床医生和研究人员提供了减少污名化的建议。患有 BPD 的参与者(消费者 n = 33)和为 BPD 患者提供支持的人(照护者 n = 30)讨论了他们对伤害性和帮助性语言的体验。研究采用了反思性主题分析法,将书面和口头回答分析为核心冲突关系主题(CCRT),以反映不同的语言是如何被听到和经历的。研究中的所有消费者和照护者都报告了使用污名化语言的经历。在消费者中,不足感和挫败感很常见,特别是当他们认为他人轻视他们的需求或没有将他们视为一个独特的个体时。照护者通常认为他人指责他们或不承认他们的需求,从而产生挫败感。消费者和照护者都表示,有益的语言包括沟通、认可和接受。无益的沟通模式会对患者的自我认识(即自我成见)以及他们与他人的关系(包括治疗联盟)产生负面影响。考虑到这些沟通模式,可以促进使用富有同情心和希望的反思性积极语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Personality and Mental Health: Multidisciplinary Studies from Personality Dysfunction to Criminal Behaviour aims to lead and shape the international field in this rapidly expanding area, uniting three distinct literatures: DSM-IV/ICD-10 defined personality disorders, psychopathy and offending behaviour. Through its multi-disciplinary and service orientated approach, Personality and Mental Health provides a peer-reviewed, authoritative resource for researchers, practitioners and policy makers working in the areas of personality and mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信