Cancer advocacy in residency education: From principles to competencies

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Klaus Puschel , Beti Thompson , Andrea Rioseco , Augusto Leon , Carolina Goic , Isabella Fuentes , Zdenka Vescovi
{"title":"Cancer advocacy in residency education: From principles to competencies","authors":"Klaus Puschel ,&nbsp;Beti Thompson ,&nbsp;Andrea Rioseco ,&nbsp;Augusto Leon ,&nbsp;Carolina Goic ,&nbsp;Isabella Fuentes ,&nbsp;Zdenka Vescovi","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The global cancer burden is increasing. Current global evidence indicates there will be a 47% rise of cancer cases for the period 2020–2040. The cancer rate differential also is evident within countries and regions. Efforts have been used to reduce the health disparities; however, the inequity prevails. One potential way to help reduce the disparity is through advocacy by physicians.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two recent systematic review articles on advocacy among physicians note that physicians are unlikely to be taught advocacy in medical education, and also note there are no advocacy competencies or skill sets that are either taught or valued in medical education. We explore literature and develop a model to understand the components of advocacy in medical education, specifically in resident training. We follow the model’s main components by examining principles of advocacy, relevant domains of advocacy, and competencies and values for advocacy education.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four ethical principles of advocacy education are identified: beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice. These principles must be applied in meaningful, culturally sensitive, respectful, and promotion of the well-being ways.</p><p>Three domains are identified: the practice domain (provider-patient interaction), the community domain (provider-community collaboration), and the health policy domain (the larger social environment). Advocacy occurs differently within each domain.</p><p>Finally, competencies in the form of knowledge, skills, and values are described. We present a table noting where each competency occurs (by domain) as well as the value of each knowledge and skill.</p></div><div><h3>Policy summary</h3><p>The significance of including advocacy instruction in medical education requires a change in the current medical education field. Besides valuing the concept of including advocacy, principles, domains, and competencies of inclusion are critical. In summary, we encourage the inclusion of advocacy education in resident medical programs so physicians become competent medical providers at diverse levels of society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538324000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The global cancer burden is increasing. Current global evidence indicates there will be a 47% rise of cancer cases for the period 2020–2040. The cancer rate differential also is evident within countries and regions. Efforts have been used to reduce the health disparities; however, the inequity prevails. One potential way to help reduce the disparity is through advocacy by physicians.

Methods

Two recent systematic review articles on advocacy among physicians note that physicians are unlikely to be taught advocacy in medical education, and also note there are no advocacy competencies or skill sets that are either taught or valued in medical education. We explore literature and develop a model to understand the components of advocacy in medical education, specifically in resident training. We follow the model’s main components by examining principles of advocacy, relevant domains of advocacy, and competencies and values for advocacy education.

Results

Four ethical principles of advocacy education are identified: beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice. These principles must be applied in meaningful, culturally sensitive, respectful, and promotion of the well-being ways.

Three domains are identified: the practice domain (provider-patient interaction), the community domain (provider-community collaboration), and the health policy domain (the larger social environment). Advocacy occurs differently within each domain.

Finally, competencies in the form of knowledge, skills, and values are described. We present a table noting where each competency occurs (by domain) as well as the value of each knowledge and skill.

Policy summary

The significance of including advocacy instruction in medical education requires a change in the current medical education field. Besides valuing the concept of including advocacy, principles, domains, and competencies of inclusion are critical. In summary, we encourage the inclusion of advocacy education in resident medical programs so physicians become competent medical providers at diverse levels of society.

住院医生教育中的癌症宣传:从原则到能力。
导言全球癌症负担日益加重。目前的全球证据表明,在 2020 年至 2040 年期间,癌症病例将增加 47%。各国和各地区的癌症发病率差异也很明显。为缩小健康差距,人们做出了各种努力,但不公平现象依然存在。帮助缩小差距的一个潜在方法是由医生进行宣传:方法:最近两篇关于医生宣传的系统性综述文章指出,医生不太可能在医学教育中学习宣传,还指出医学教育中没有教授或重视宣传能力或技能组合。我们对文献进行了探讨,并建立了一个模型,以了解医学教育(尤其是住院医师培训)中宣传的组成部分。我们按照该模型的主要组成部分,研究了宣传原则、宣传的相关领域以及宣传教育的能力和价值观:结果:我们确定了宣传教育的四项伦理原则:有利、无弊、自主和公正。这些原则必须以有意义、对文化敏感、尊重和促进福祉的方式加以应用。确定了三个领域:实践领域(医疗服务提供者与患者之间的互动)、社区领域(医疗服务提供者与社区之间的合作)和卫生政策领域(更大的社会环境)。在每个领域中,宣传的方式各不相同。最后,以知识、技能和价值观的形式描述了能力。我们以表格的形式列出了每种能力(按领域划分)出现的位置以及每种知识和技能的价值。政策摘要:将宣传教学纳入医学教育的意义要求改变当前的医学教育领域。除了重视纳入宣传的概念外,纳入的原则、领域和能力也至关重要。总之,我们鼓励在住院医师项目中纳入宣传教育,使医生成为社会不同层面的合格医疗服务提供者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信