Different Methods to Detect Stress in Knowledge Workers: A Pilot Study for Long-term Monitoring.

Q3 Medicine
Päivi Vanttola, Elena Vildjiounaite, Mikael Sallinen, Johanna Kallio, Teemu I Paajanen, Kristian Lukander, Vesa Kyllönen, Sampsa Puttonen
{"title":"Different Methods to Detect Stress in Knowledge Workers: A Pilot Study for Long-term Monitoring.","authors":"Päivi Vanttola, Elena Vildjiounaite, Mikael Sallinen, Johanna Kallio, Teemu I Paajanen, Kristian Lukander, Vesa Kyllönen, Sampsa Puttonen","doi":"10.7888/juoeh.46.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stress is a common part of working life, but knowledge is lacking on how to identify it early and with little effort on the part of the employee. We investigated whether simple stress reports and computer usage data could be useful tools for long-term assessment of stress in real life. 38 experts responded to a baseline questionnaire on need for recovery (NFR) and psychological distress (General Health Questionnaire, GHQ12). Their computer usage for work was recorded for 5 months, during which they filled in a 4-month simple diary and a 2-week detailed diary on, for example, stress and productivity. Salivary cortisol and heart rate variability were collected on 3 consecutive days. Generalized estimating equations models were used for the analyses. High NFR and GHQ12 predicted self-reported stress during work, and a decrease in (some) mouse usage features, but not keyboard usage features, over the following months. Some mouse usage features were associated with stress and productivity. The results provide some support for the usefulness of simple stress questions and mouse usage features in assessing long-term stress in real life.</p>","PeriodicalId":17570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of UOEH","volume":"46 1","pages":"103-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of UOEH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7888/juoeh.46.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stress is a common part of working life, but knowledge is lacking on how to identify it early and with little effort on the part of the employee. We investigated whether simple stress reports and computer usage data could be useful tools for long-term assessment of stress in real life. 38 experts responded to a baseline questionnaire on need for recovery (NFR) and psychological distress (General Health Questionnaire, GHQ12). Their computer usage for work was recorded for 5 months, during which they filled in a 4-month simple diary and a 2-week detailed diary on, for example, stress and productivity. Salivary cortisol and heart rate variability were collected on 3 consecutive days. Generalized estimating equations models were used for the analyses. High NFR and GHQ12 predicted self-reported stress during work, and a decrease in (some) mouse usage features, but not keyboard usage features, over the following months. Some mouse usage features were associated with stress and productivity. The results provide some support for the usefulness of simple stress questions and mouse usage features in assessing long-term stress in real life.

检测知识型员工压力的不同方法:长期监测试点研究。
压力是工作生活中常见的一部分,但对于如何及早识别压力却缺乏了解。我们研究了简单的压力报告和计算机使用数据是否能成为长期评估现实生活中压力的有用工具。38 名专家回答了关于康复需求(NFR)和心理困扰(一般健康问卷,GHQ12)的基线问卷。在此期间,他们填写了为期 4 个月的简单日记和为期 2 周的详细日记,内容包括压力和工作效率等。连续 3 天收集唾液皮质醇和心率变异性。分析采用了广义估计方程模型。高 NFR 和 GHQ12 预测了自我报告的工作压力,以及在接下来的几个月中(部分)鼠标使用功能的下降,但不包括键盘使用功能的下降。某些鼠标使用特征与压力和工作效率有关。这些结果为简单的压力问题和鼠标使用特征在评估现实生活中长期压力方面的实用性提供了一些支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of UOEH
Journal of UOEH Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Published quarterly: 1 annual volume consisted of 4 numbers. Issued on the 1st of March, June, September and December, respectively.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信