Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for preventing shoulder subluxation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08264-9
Kenta Fujimura, Hitoshi Kagaya, Ryoka Itoh, Chiharu Endo, Hiroki Tanikawa, Hirofumi Maeda
{"title":"Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for preventing shoulder subluxation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Kenta Fujimura, Hitoshi Kagaya, Ryoka Itoh, Chiharu Endo, Hiroki Tanikawa, Hirofumi Maeda","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08264-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shoulder subluxation caused by paralysis after stroke is a serious issue affecting shoulder pain and functional prognosis. However, its preventive treatment has not been fully investigated.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) on the prevention of shoulder subluxation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-center, parallel-group, prospective randomized, open-blinded, end-point study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Convalescent rehabilitation ward.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>We included 50 inpatients in the convalescent rehabilitation ward with post-stroke, having upper limb paralysis, and the acromio-humeral interval (AHI) was within 1/2 finger-breadth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A blinded computer-based allocation system was used to randomly assign patients into two groups: 1) conventional rehabilitation plus rPMS therapy (rPMS group, N=25); and 2) conventional rehabilitation alone (control group, N=25). Blinded assessors evaluated the patients before the intervention (T0), 6 weeks after (T1), and 12 weeks after (T2). The primary outcome was the change in AHIs from T0 to T1 between the groups. In contrast, the secondary outcomes were shoulder pain, spasticity, active range of motion, and Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity (FMA-UE) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients in the rPMS group and 24 in the control group completed T1, whereas 16 in the rPMS group and 11 in the control group completed T2. The change in AHI was significantly lower in the rPMS group than in the control group ([95% CI, -5.15 to -0.390], P=0.023). Within-group analysis showed that AHI in the rPMS group did not change significantly, whereas it increased in the control group (P=0.004). There were no significant differences between T1 and T2 within or between the groups. Moreover, AHI did not show differences in patients with severe impairment but decreased in the rPMS group in patients with mild impairment (P=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rPMS may be a new modality for preventing shoulder subluxation. The association between motor impairment and the sustained effect needs to be further examined.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>Applying rPMS to the muscles of the paralyzed shoulder after a stroke may prevent shoulder subluxation.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08264-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shoulder subluxation caused by paralysis after stroke is a serious issue affecting shoulder pain and functional prognosis. However, its preventive treatment has not been fully investigated.

Aim: To investigate the effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) on the prevention of shoulder subluxation.

Design: A single-center, parallel-group, prospective randomized, open-blinded, end-point study.

Setting: Convalescent rehabilitation ward.

Population: We included 50 inpatients in the convalescent rehabilitation ward with post-stroke, having upper limb paralysis, and the acromio-humeral interval (AHI) was within 1/2 finger-breadth.

Methods: A blinded computer-based allocation system was used to randomly assign patients into two groups: 1) conventional rehabilitation plus rPMS therapy (rPMS group, N=25); and 2) conventional rehabilitation alone (control group, N=25). Blinded assessors evaluated the patients before the intervention (T0), 6 weeks after (T1), and 12 weeks after (T2). The primary outcome was the change in AHIs from T0 to T1 between the groups. In contrast, the secondary outcomes were shoulder pain, spasticity, active range of motion, and Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity (FMA-UE) score.

Results: Twenty-two patients in the rPMS group and 24 in the control group completed T1, whereas 16 in the rPMS group and 11 in the control group completed T2. The change in AHI was significantly lower in the rPMS group than in the control group ([95% CI, -5.15 to -0.390], P=0.023). Within-group analysis showed that AHI in the rPMS group did not change significantly, whereas it increased in the control group (P=0.004). There were no significant differences between T1 and T2 within or between the groups. Moreover, AHI did not show differences in patients with severe impairment but decreased in the rPMS group in patients with mild impairment (P=0.001).

Conclusions: The rPMS may be a new modality for preventing shoulder subluxation. The association between motor impairment and the sustained effect needs to be further examined.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: Applying rPMS to the muscles of the paralyzed shoulder after a stroke may prevent shoulder subluxation.

预防中风后肩关节脱位的重复性外周磁刺激:随机对照试验。
背景:脑卒中后瘫痪引起的肩关节半脱位是一个严重影响肩关节疼痛和功能预后的问题,但其预防性治疗尚未得到充分研究。目的:研究重复性外周磁刺激(rPMS)对预防肩关节半脱位的影响:设计:单中心、平行组、前瞻性随机、开盲、终点研究:研究对象: 50 名康复疗养病房的住院患者:纳入 50 名上肢瘫痪、肩肱间距(AHI)在 1/2指宽以内的脑卒中后康复疗养病房住院患者:方法:采用计算机盲法分配系统,将患者随机分为两组:1)常规康复加rPMS疗法组(rPMS组,25人);2)单纯常规康复组(对照组,25人)。盲人评估员分别在干预前(T0)、干预后 6 周(T1)和干预后 12 周(T2)对患者进行评估。主要结果是两组之间从 T0 到 T1 的 AHIs 变化。而次要结果则是肩痛、痉挛、主动活动范围和 Fugl-Meyer 评估上肢(FMA-UE)评分:22名rPMS组患者和24名对照组患者完成了T1,而16名rPMS组患者和11名对照组患者完成了T2。rPMS组的AHI变化明显低于对照组([95% CI, -5.15 to -0.390],P=0.023)。组内分析表明,rPMS 组的 AHI 无明显变化,而对照组的 AHI 有所上升(P=0.004)。在组内和组间,T1 和 T2 之间无明显差异。此外,AHI 在重度受损患者中没有显示出差异,但在轻度受损患者中,rPMS 组的 AHI 有所下降(P=0.001):rPMS可能是一种预防肩关节脱位的新方法。临床康复效果:临床康复影响:在中风后瘫痪的肩部肌肉上应用 rPMS 可预防肩关节半脱位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信