The Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory: Psychometric Properties and Symptom Comparisons in Women With and Without Brain Injuries Due to Intimate Partner Violence.

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Assessment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1177/10731911241236687
Justin E Karr, Agnes E White, Sharon E Leong, T K Logan
{"title":"The Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory: Psychometric Properties and Symptom Comparisons in Women With and Without Brain Injuries Due to Intimate Partner Violence.","authors":"Justin E Karr, Agnes E White, Sharon E Leong, T K Logan","doi":"10.1177/10731911241236687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study psychometrically evaluated the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) among women survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) and compared symptoms between women with no brain injury history (<i>n</i> = 93) and women with IPV-related brain injury history (<i>n</i> = 112). Women completed the NSI and questionnaires on traumatic brain injury (TBI), hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HI-BI), and lifetime IPV history. A four-factor NSI model, including affective, somatosensory, cognitive, and vestibular factors, had the best fit (comparative fit index = 0.970, root mean square error of approximation = 0.064), with strong reliability for the total score (<i>ω</i> = .93) and subscale scores (<i>ω</i> range = .72-.89). In group comparisons, women with IPV-related brain injuries reported greater total, affective, and cognitive symptom severity after adjusting for age and education; however, no group differences were observed after adjusting for IPV severity. When examining lifetime number of brain injuries, HI-BI count was independently predictive of total, cognitive, and vestibular symptom severity after adjusting for age, education, and IPV severity; whereas TBI count did not independently predict any NSI scores after adjusting for these covariates. The NSI had acceptable psychometric properties for measuring neurobehavioral symptoms among women survivors of IPV. The association between HI-BI count and cognitive and vestibular symptoms may indicate the importance of studying repetitive nonfatal strangulation as an injury mechanism in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"102-118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241236687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study psychometrically evaluated the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) among women survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) and compared symptoms between women with no brain injury history (n = 93) and women with IPV-related brain injury history (n = 112). Women completed the NSI and questionnaires on traumatic brain injury (TBI), hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HI-BI), and lifetime IPV history. A four-factor NSI model, including affective, somatosensory, cognitive, and vestibular factors, had the best fit (comparative fit index = 0.970, root mean square error of approximation = 0.064), with strong reliability for the total score (ω = .93) and subscale scores (ω range = .72-.89). In group comparisons, women with IPV-related brain injuries reported greater total, affective, and cognitive symptom severity after adjusting for age and education; however, no group differences were observed after adjusting for IPV severity. When examining lifetime number of brain injuries, HI-BI count was independently predictive of total, cognitive, and vestibular symptom severity after adjusting for age, education, and IPV severity; whereas TBI count did not independently predict any NSI scores after adjusting for these covariates. The NSI had acceptable psychometric properties for measuring neurobehavioral symptoms among women survivors of IPV. The association between HI-BI count and cognitive and vestibular symptoms may indicate the importance of studying repetitive nonfatal strangulation as an injury mechanism in this population.

神经行为症状量表:亲密伴侣暴力导致脑损伤和未造成脑损伤的女性的心理计量特性和症状比较》(Psychometric Properties and Symptom Comparisons in Women With and Without Brain Jury due to Intimate Partner Violence.
本研究对亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)女性幸存者的神经行为症状量表(NSI)进行了心理评估,并对无脑损伤史(93 人)和有 IPV 相关脑损伤史(112 人)的女性幸存者的症状进行了比较。妇女们完成了 NSI 和有关创伤性脑损伤 (TBI)、缺氧缺血性脑损伤 (HI-BI) 和终生 IPV 史的问卷调查。包括情感、躯体感觉、认知和前庭因素在内的四因素 NSI 模型具有最佳拟合度(比较拟合指数 = 0.970,近似均方根误差 = 0.064),总分(ω = .93)和分量表得分(ω 范围 = .72-.89)具有很高的可靠性。在分组比较中,在对年龄和教育程度进行调整后,有 IPV 相关脑损伤的女性报告的总症状、情感症状和认知症状严重程度更高;但是,在对 IPV 严重程度进行调整后,没有观察到任何分组差异。在检查终生脑损伤次数时,在对年龄、教育程度和 IPV 严重程度进行调整后,HI-BI 次数可独立预测总症状、认知症状和前庭症状的严重程度;而在对这些协变量进行调整后,TBI 次数不能独立预测任何 NSI 分数。NSI在测量IPV女性幸存者的神经行为症状方面具有可接受的心理测量特性。HI-BI次数与认知症状和前庭症状之间的关联可能表明,将重复性非致命性扼颈作为一种伤害机制对这一人群进行研究具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信