The effect of antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulants on the accuracy of faecal immunochemical testing.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
F Wu, A A Khan, M Klimovskij, R Harshen
{"title":"The effect of antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulants on the accuracy of faecal immunochemical testing.","authors":"F Wu, A A Khan, M Klimovskij, R Harshen","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) has been adopted to identify patients requiring further investigations on the colorectal cancer (CRC) referral pathway. We aimed to investigate the effect of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs on the accuracy of FIT results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study categorised patients with suspected CRC symptoms, who completed both FIT and colonic investigations, into two groups (control and exposed) based on their use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs. Two-by-two tables and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to determine accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 928 patients were divided into a control (<i>n</i>=683) and an exposed group (<i>n</i>=245). A nonsignificant higher proportion of patients tested positive in the exposed group (24.1% vs 18.4%, <i>p</i>=0.063). For detection of CRC, improved sensitivity of 87% vs 81.2%, specificity of 84.8% vs 79.9% and negative predictive value of 99.2% vs 98.3% was calculated in the control vs exposed groups, respectively. The positive predictive value was comparable between the two groups (21.4% vs 22% in the control and exposed groups, respectively). In ROC analysis, there was no difference between the groups (AUC 90% vs 87%, <i>p</i>=0.56). The use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs did not increase the risk of positive FIT results on multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIT accuracy for CRC detection remained unaffected despite more patients testing positive in the exposed group. FIT should be considered a supplementary tool for triage. Antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs do not need to be discontinued before collection of FIT.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"521-527"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11214854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) has been adopted to identify patients requiring further investigations on the colorectal cancer (CRC) referral pathway. We aimed to investigate the effect of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs on the accuracy of FIT results.

Methods: This observational study categorised patients with suspected CRC symptoms, who completed both FIT and colonic investigations, into two groups (control and exposed) based on their use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs. Two-by-two tables and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to determine accuracy.

Results: A total of 928 patients were divided into a control (n=683) and an exposed group (n=245). A nonsignificant higher proportion of patients tested positive in the exposed group (24.1% vs 18.4%, p=0.063). For detection of CRC, improved sensitivity of 87% vs 81.2%, specificity of 84.8% vs 79.9% and negative predictive value of 99.2% vs 98.3% was calculated in the control vs exposed groups, respectively. The positive predictive value was comparable between the two groups (21.4% vs 22% in the control and exposed groups, respectively). In ROC analysis, there was no difference between the groups (AUC 90% vs 87%, p=0.56). The use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs did not increase the risk of positive FIT results on multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions: FIT accuracy for CRC detection remained unaffected despite more patients testing positive in the exposed group. FIT should be considered a supplementary tool for triage. Antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs do not need to be discontinued before collection of FIT.

抗血小板疗法和口服抗凝剂对粪便免疫化学检验准确性的影响。
导言:粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)已被用于确定结直肠癌(CRC)转诊途径中需要进一步检查的患者。我们旨在研究抗血小板和抗凝药物对 FIT 结果准确性的影响:这项观察性研究根据使用抗血小板和抗凝药物的情况,将有疑似 CRC 症状并完成 FIT 和结肠检查的患者分为两组(对照组和暴露组)。采用两两对照表和接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线分析来确定准确性:共有 928 名患者被分为对照组(683 人)和暴露组(245 人)。暴露组中检测结果呈阳性的患者比例明显高于对照组(24.1% 对 18.4%,P=0.063)。对照组与暴露组检测出 CRC 的灵敏度分别为 87% 对 81.2%,特异度分别为 84.8% 对 79.9%,阴性预测值分别为 99.2% 对 98.3%。两组的阳性预测值相当(对照组和暴露组分别为 21.4% 对 22%)。在 ROC 分析中,两组之间没有差异(AUC 90% vs 87%,P=0.56)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,使用抗血小板和抗凝药物并不会增加FIT阳性结果的风险:结论:尽管暴露组中有更多患者检测出阳性结果,但 FIT 检测出 CRC 的准确性仍未受到影响。FIT 应被视为分诊的辅助工具。在采集 FIT 之前无需停用抗血小板和抗凝药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信