Fibrin glue and coats compromise the integrity of colonic anastomosis: an experimental trial on rats.

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-18 DOI:10.20524/aog.2024.0859
Nikolaos Voloudakis, Ioannis Koutelidakis, Emmanouil Christoforidis, Stefanos Atmatzidis, Georgia Kotoreni, Basilios Papaziogas, Dimitrios Schizas, Christos Zavos, Apostolos Papalois, Grigorios Chatzimavroudis
{"title":"Fibrin glue and coats compromise the integrity of colonic anastomosis: an experimental trial on rats.","authors":"Nikolaos Voloudakis, Ioannis Koutelidakis, Emmanouil Christoforidis, Stefanos Atmatzidis, Georgia Kotoreni, Basilios Papaziogas, Dimitrios Schizas, Christos Zavos, Apostolos Papalois, Grigorios Chatzimavroudis","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic leak remains a dreaded complication in colorectal surgery. Identifying optimal techniques that minimize its incidence is an active area of investigation. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the effect of commonly used hemostatic products on the integrity of colonic anastomoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male Wistar rats were randomized into 4 groups. In the control group (A), the anastomosis was performed using the standard hand-sewn technique in the ascending colon. In group B the hand-sewn technique was reinforced with a collagen-fibrinogen patch, in group C with fibrin glue, and in group D with a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated oxidized cellulose patch. On the 7<sup>th</sup> postoperative day, anastomotic bursting pressure measurements were obtained. A specimen surrounding the anastomosis was retrieved for histopathologic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 19 rats, 17 survived and 15 were included in the analysis (5 in each of groups A, B and C). Testing in group D was discontinued following adverse events in the preliminary experiments. The mean bursting pressure of the anastomosis was significantly higher in the control group (A: 221±19.41 mmHg, B: 151±14.42 mmHg, and C: 112±13.57 mmHg; P=0.001). Anastomotic healing parameters were not different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although experimental data support the use of sealants in defective anastomoses, in this study the reinforcement of colonic anastomosis with fibrin or oxidized cellulose-PEG sealants did not improve either bursting pressure values or anastomotic healing. More data from robust anastomoses of animals and humans are needed before sealing becomes common clinical practice in colorectal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 2","pages":"216-224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10927628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2024.0859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leak remains a dreaded complication in colorectal surgery. Identifying optimal techniques that minimize its incidence is an active area of investigation. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the effect of commonly used hemostatic products on the integrity of colonic anastomoses.

Methods: Male Wistar rats were randomized into 4 groups. In the control group (A), the anastomosis was performed using the standard hand-sewn technique in the ascending colon. In group B the hand-sewn technique was reinforced with a collagen-fibrinogen patch, in group C with fibrin glue, and in group D with a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated oxidized cellulose patch. On the 7th postoperative day, anastomotic bursting pressure measurements were obtained. A specimen surrounding the anastomosis was retrieved for histopathologic evaluation.

Results: Of the 19 rats, 17 survived and 15 were included in the analysis (5 in each of groups A, B and C). Testing in group D was discontinued following adverse events in the preliminary experiments. The mean bursting pressure of the anastomosis was significantly higher in the control group (A: 221±19.41 mmHg, B: 151±14.42 mmHg, and C: 112±13.57 mmHg; P=0.001). Anastomotic healing parameters were not different between groups.

Conclusions: Although experimental data support the use of sealants in defective anastomoses, in this study the reinforcement of colonic anastomosis with fibrin or oxidized cellulose-PEG sealants did not improve either bursting pressure values or anastomotic healing. More data from robust anastomoses of animals and humans are needed before sealing becomes common clinical practice in colorectal surgery.

纤维蛋白胶和包衣损害结肠吻合术的完整性:大鼠实验试验。
背景:吻合口漏仍是结直肠手术中一种可怕的并发症。找出能最大限度降低其发生率的最佳技术是一个积极的研究领域。本实验研究旨在评估常用止血产品对结肠吻合口完整性的影响:方法:将雄性 Wistar 大鼠随机分为 4 组。对照组(A 组)采用标准手缝技术在升结肠进行吻合。B 组使用胶原-纤维蛋白原补片加强手缝技术,C 组使用纤维蛋白胶,D 组使用聚乙二醇(PEG)包裹的氧化纤维素补片。术后第 7 天,测量吻合口破裂压力。取吻合口周围的标本进行组织病理学评估:结果:在 19 只大鼠中,17 只存活,15 只纳入分析(A、B 和 C 组各 5 只)。在初步实验中出现不良反应后,D 组停止了测试。对照组吻合口的平均破裂压明显更高(A:221±19.41 mmHg;B:151±14.42 mmHg;C:112±13.57 mmHg;P=0.001)。各组吻合口愈合参数无差异:结论:尽管实验数据支持在有缺陷的吻合口中使用密封剂,但在本研究中,用纤维蛋白或氧化纤维素-PEG密封剂加固结肠吻合口并不能改善爆破压值或吻合口愈合。在密封成为结肠直肠外科常用的临床实践方法之前,还需要更多来自动物和人类吻合口的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信