Valentina Gentili PhD , Giovanni Strazzabosco MS , Rossella Spena MD , Sabrina Rizzo MS , Silvia Beltrami MS , Giovanna Schiuma MS , Andrea Alogna MS , Roberta Rizzo PhD
{"title":"Comparison Between Moxifloxacin and Chloramphenicol for the Treatment of Bacterial Eye Infections","authors":"Valentina Gentili PhD , Giovanni Strazzabosco MS , Rossella Spena MD , Sabrina Rizzo MS , Silvia Beltrami MS , Giovanna Schiuma MS , Andrea Alogna MS , Roberta Rizzo PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.curtheres.2024.100740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Moxifloxacin is a bactericidal methoxyquinolone used for the treatment of conjunctivitis and prophylactic therapy in cataract and refractive surgeries. Chloramphenicol is a bacteriostatic organochlorine introduced into clinical practice in 1948 and used mainly in topical preparations because of its known toxicity.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The study aimed to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial effect and the ocular cytotoxicity of these broad-spectrum antibiotics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Antimicrobic activity was tested on 4 bacteria strains (<em>Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus,</em> and <em>Staphylococcus epidermidis</em>), and determined through calculation of MIC and half inhibitory concentration for each microorganism. Antibacterial activity was determined by microdilution method after 24 hours’ incubation with 2-fold serial dilutions (2.5 mg/mL to 4.883 µg/mL) of moxifloxacin and chloramphenicol. Disk diffusion test were performed according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing methodology. Biofilm formation inhibition and biofilm eradication concentration assay were conducted for <em>P aeruginosa</em> and <em>S epidermidis</em> using the microdilution method. Cytotoxicity of antibiotics was evaluated by MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) colorimetric assay on human corneal cell.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Cytotoxicity of antibiotics was evaluated on human epithelial corneal cells after 4 hours treatment by viability assay. Results showed that corneal cell viability was significantly higher after moxifloxacin treatment compared with chloramphenicol (<em>P</em> < 0.01). Moxifloxacin is characterized by a significantly lower MIC and half inhibitory concentration values and a larger inhibition zone for all the strain tested, with high performance in controlling gram-negative growth, compared with chloramphenicol. Moreover, moxifloxacin showed higher activity compared with chloramphenicol in the inhibition of biofilm formation and in the disruption of biofilm, especially against <em>S epidermidis</em> biofilm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The lower corneal cell toxicity and the broader spectrum of antibacterial activity observed with moxifloxacin suggests its use in ophthalmic solution for the treatment of bacterial eye infections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10920,"journal":{"name":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 100740"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X24000109/pdfft?md5=8b6bfd7065291c3dad22bc467f0a7fec&pid=1-s2.0-S0011393X24000109-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X24000109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Moxifloxacin is a bactericidal methoxyquinolone used for the treatment of conjunctivitis and prophylactic therapy in cataract and refractive surgeries. Chloramphenicol is a bacteriostatic organochlorine introduced into clinical practice in 1948 and used mainly in topical preparations because of its known toxicity.
Objectives
The study aimed to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial effect and the ocular cytotoxicity of these broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Methods
Antimicrobic activity was tested on 4 bacteria strains (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis), and determined through calculation of MIC and half inhibitory concentration for each microorganism. Antibacterial activity was determined by microdilution method after 24 hours’ incubation with 2-fold serial dilutions (2.5 mg/mL to 4.883 µg/mL) of moxifloxacin and chloramphenicol. Disk diffusion test were performed according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing methodology. Biofilm formation inhibition and biofilm eradication concentration assay were conducted for P aeruginosa and S epidermidis using the microdilution method. Cytotoxicity of antibiotics was evaluated by MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) colorimetric assay on human corneal cell.
Results
Cytotoxicity of antibiotics was evaluated on human epithelial corneal cells after 4 hours treatment by viability assay. Results showed that corneal cell viability was significantly higher after moxifloxacin treatment compared with chloramphenicol (P < 0.01). Moxifloxacin is characterized by a significantly lower MIC and half inhibitory concentration values and a larger inhibition zone for all the strain tested, with high performance in controlling gram-negative growth, compared with chloramphenicol. Moreover, moxifloxacin showed higher activity compared with chloramphenicol in the inhibition of biofilm formation and in the disruption of biofilm, especially against S epidermidis biofilm.
Conclusions
The lower corneal cell toxicity and the broader spectrum of antibacterial activity observed with moxifloxacin suggests its use in ophthalmic solution for the treatment of bacterial eye infections.
期刊介绍:
We also encourage the submission of manuscripts presenting preclinical and very preliminary research that may stimulate further investigation of potentially relevant findings, as well as in-depth review articles on specific therapies or disease states, and applied health delivery or pharmacoeconomics.
CTR encourages and supports the submission of manuscripts describing:
• Interventions designed to understand or improve human health, disease treatment or disease prevention;
• Studies that focus on problems that are uncommon in resource-rich countries;
• Research that is "under-published" because of limited access to monetary resources such as English language support and Open Access fees (CTR offers deeply discounted English language editing);
• Republication of articles previously published in non-English journals (eg, evidence-based guidelines) which could be useful if translated into English;
• Preclinical and clinical product development studies that are not pursued for further investigation based upon early phase results.