Disparities in Transitions From E-cigarette Use to Other Tobacco Use Patterns Among Sexual Minority Versus Heterosexual Women and Men in the United States.

Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1177/29767342241232763
Katelyn F Romm, Carla J Berg
{"title":"Disparities in Transitions From E-cigarette Use to Other Tobacco Use Patterns Among Sexual Minority Versus Heterosexual Women and Men in the United States.","authors":"Katelyn F Romm, Carla J Berg","doi":"10.1177/29767342241232763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite elevated rates of e-cigarette use among sexual minority versus heterosexual young adults, limited research has examined sexual identity in relation to transitions from e-cigarette use to other tobacco use patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 608 US young adults in a 2-year study (2018-2020) who reported using e-cigarettes in the past 6 months (time period between assessments) but no other tobacco product at baseline (Fall 2018). Multinomial logistic regressions among women and men, separately, examined associations between sexual identity and past 6-month tobacco use in Fall 2020 (nonuse [referent group] vs e-cigarette only, other tobacco product only, e-cigarette and other tobacco product dual use), controlling for age and race/ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among women (n = 340; mean [<i>M</i>]<sub>age</sub> = 23.42; n = 147 [43.4%] sexual minority; 29.4% racial/ethnic minority), 34.4% reported nonuse at follow-up, 26.8% e-cigarette only, 10.3% other tobacco product only, and 28.5% e-cigarette and other tobacco product dual use. Sexual minority (vs heterosexual) women displayed greater odds of e-cigarette-only use, as well as dual use relative to nonuse at follow-up. Among men (n = 244; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 24.30; n = 51 [20.9%] sexual minority; 36.1% racial/ethnic minority), 25.4% reported no use, 20.9% e-cigarette only, 17.2% other tobacco product only, and 36.5% dual use at follow-up. Sexual minority (vs heterosexual) men displayed lower odds of e-cigarette only, other tobacco product only, and dual use relative to nonuse at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Research is needed to assess and intervene on tobacco/nicotine product perceptions (eg, harm, social acceptability) and reasons for use (eg, mood regulation) associated with high-risk tobacco use patterns and trajectories, particularly among sexual minority young adult women who may have distinct profiles and risks associated with use.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241232763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite elevated rates of e-cigarette use among sexual minority versus heterosexual young adults, limited research has examined sexual identity in relation to transitions from e-cigarette use to other tobacco use patterns.

Methods: We analyzed data from 608 US young adults in a 2-year study (2018-2020) who reported using e-cigarettes in the past 6 months (time period between assessments) but no other tobacco product at baseline (Fall 2018). Multinomial logistic regressions among women and men, separately, examined associations between sexual identity and past 6-month tobacco use in Fall 2020 (nonuse [referent group] vs e-cigarette only, other tobacco product only, e-cigarette and other tobacco product dual use), controlling for age and race/ethnicity.

Results: Among women (n = 340; mean [M]age = 23.42; n = 147 [43.4%] sexual minority; 29.4% racial/ethnic minority), 34.4% reported nonuse at follow-up, 26.8% e-cigarette only, 10.3% other tobacco product only, and 28.5% e-cigarette and other tobacco product dual use. Sexual minority (vs heterosexual) women displayed greater odds of e-cigarette-only use, as well as dual use relative to nonuse at follow-up. Among men (n = 244; Mage = 24.30; n = 51 [20.9%] sexual minority; 36.1% racial/ethnic minority), 25.4% reported no use, 20.9% e-cigarette only, 17.2% other tobacco product only, and 36.5% dual use at follow-up. Sexual minority (vs heterosexual) men displayed lower odds of e-cigarette only, other tobacco product only, and dual use relative to nonuse at follow-up.

Conclusions: Research is needed to assess and intervene on tobacco/nicotine product perceptions (eg, harm, social acceptability) and reasons for use (eg, mood regulation) associated with high-risk tobacco use patterns and trajectories, particularly among sexual minority young adult women who may have distinct profiles and risks associated with use.

美国性少数群体与异性恋男女从使用电子烟过渡到其他烟草使用模式的差异。
导言:尽管与异性恋青年相比,性少数群体青年使用电子烟的比例较高,但对性身份与电子烟使用向其他烟草使用模式过渡的关系的研究却很有限:我们分析了一项为期 2 年(2018-2020 年)的研究中 608 名美国年轻人的数据,这些年轻人报告在过去 6 个月(两次评估之间的时间段)中使用过电子烟,但在基线(2018 年秋季)时没有使用过其他烟草产品。分别对女性和男性进行多项式逻辑回归,考察了性身份与 2020 年秋季过去 6 个月烟草使用情况(不使用[参照组] vs 仅使用电子烟、仅使用其他烟草制品、电子烟和其他烟草制品双重使用)之间的关联,并对年龄和种族/人种进行了控制:在女性(n = 340;平均[M]年龄 = 23.42;n = 147 [43.4%]性少数群体;29.4% 种族/族裔少数群体)中,34.4% 在随访时报告未使用电子烟,26.8% 仅使用电子烟,10.3% 仅使用其他烟草制品,28.5% 电子烟和其他烟草制品双重使用。性少数群体女性(与异性恋女性相比)仅使用电子烟以及双重使用电子烟的几率高于随访时未使用的几率。在男性(n = 244;Mage = 24.30;n = 51 [20.9%]性少数群体;36.1%少数种族/族裔)中,25.4%的人报告在随访时未使用电子烟,20.9%的人仅使用电子烟,17.2%的人仅使用其他烟草制品,36.5%的人双重使用。性少数群体(相对于异性恋)男性在随访时仅使用电子烟、仅使用其他烟草制品和双重使用的几率低于不使用的几率:需要对与高风险烟草使用模式和轨迹相关的烟草/尼古丁产品认知(如危害、社会可接受性)和使用原因(如情绪调节)进行评估和干预,特别是在性少数群体的年轻成年女性中,她们可能有独特的特征和与使用相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信