{"title":"Effect of ceramic type and thickness on the masking ability of chairside machinable all-ceramic crowns.","authors":"Sinuo Li, Luyao Zhang, Shanshan Liang, Yuqiang Liu, Wenzhong Xing","doi":"10.7518/hxkq.2024.2023263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the influence of ceramic type and thickness on the masking ability and final aesthetic effects of chairside machinable all-ceramic crowns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six kinds from three types chairside machinable ceramic materials (IPS e.max CAD HT/MT/LT, IPS Empress LT, and VITA Suprinity HT/T) in shade A2 were fabricated to slice specimens into 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm-thick sections (<i>n</i>=10). The color parameters of the specimens against black and white tiles and four resin substrates (A2, A4, B3, and C4 shade) were measured with a spectrophotometer. The translucency parameter (TP) was calculated using color parameters measured over standard white and black backgrounds. The color differences (ΔE) were calculated between there substrate shades (A4, B3, C4 ) and A2 shade (control group). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the TP values. The two va-riables were ceramic type and ceramic thickness. Three-way ANOVA was used to determine the effects of ceramic materials, ceramic thickness, and substrate shades on the ΔE values, followed by Tukey test for multiple comparisons (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ceramic type, ceramic thickness, and substrate shade significantly affected the ΔE values (<i>P</i><0.001). The L* and b* values of the specimens increased with increasing ceramic thickness, except in substrate A2, whereas the ΔE values decreased. The color difference of all 1.0 mm-thick specimens or all specimens over the substrates C4 shade exceeded the clinically acceptable threshold (ΔE>3.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The masking ability of chairside machinable all-ceramic crowns is influenced by ceramic type and thickness, and ceramic material. The thickness of ceramic less than 2.0 mm cannot mask the gray shade abutment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94028,"journal":{"name":"Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology","volume":"42 1","pages":"56-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10965345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2024.2023263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of ceramic type and thickness on the masking ability and final aesthetic effects of chairside machinable all-ceramic crowns.
Methods: Six kinds from three types chairside machinable ceramic materials (IPS e.max CAD HT/MT/LT, IPS Empress LT, and VITA Suprinity HT/T) in shade A2 were fabricated to slice specimens into 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm-thick sections (n=10). The color parameters of the specimens against black and white tiles and four resin substrates (A2, A4, B3, and C4 shade) were measured with a spectrophotometer. The translucency parameter (TP) was calculated using color parameters measured over standard white and black backgrounds. The color differences (ΔE) were calculated between there substrate shades (A4, B3, C4 ) and A2 shade (control group). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the TP values. The two va-riables were ceramic type and ceramic thickness. Three-way ANOVA was used to determine the effects of ceramic materials, ceramic thickness, and substrate shades on the ΔE values, followed by Tukey test for multiple comparisons (α=0.05).
Results: Ceramic type, ceramic thickness, and substrate shade significantly affected the ΔE values (P<0.001). The L* and b* values of the specimens increased with increasing ceramic thickness, except in substrate A2, whereas the ΔE values decreased. The color difference of all 1.0 mm-thick specimens or all specimens over the substrates C4 shade exceeded the clinically acceptable threshold (ΔE>3.3).
Conclusions: The masking ability of chairside machinable all-ceramic crowns is influenced by ceramic type and thickness, and ceramic material. The thickness of ceramic less than 2.0 mm cannot mask the gray shade abutment.