Experiences of informal caregivers of people with dementia in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hien Thi Ho, Romy Jia, Nahal Habibi, Cindy Stern, Gillian Carter, Olinda Santin, Jennifer Stone, Chelsea Valenzuela, Edoardo Aromataris
{"title":"Experiences of informal caregivers of people with dementia in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Hien Thi Ho, Romy Jia, Nahal Habibi, Cindy Stern, Gillian Carter, Olinda Santin, Jennifer Stone, Chelsea Valenzuela, Edoardo Aromataris","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to synthesize the experiences of informal caregivers of people with dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Globally, the burden of dementia is increasing disproportionately in LMICs. Informal caregivers play a vital role and face multiple challenges in LMICs, even though they also often lack the awareness and skills to provide adequate care for people living with dementia. Many LMICs have limited resources and caregivers lack support services. Understanding their experiences and perceptions may improve interventions, helping caregivers to better support those living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies from all settings in LMICs will be considered. Qualitative data from qualitative or mixed methods studies that explore caregivers' experiences and perceptions will be included in this review. Participants are informal caregivers of people diagnosed with dementia at any stage, regardless of age, gender, or their relationship with people living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for a qualitative systematic reviews, with meta-aggregation as the synthesis method. The review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A 3-step search strategy will be used to locate published and unpublished studies in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, AgeLine, LILACS, African Index Medicus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Open Dissertations, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar. There will be no date or language limitations. All studies will be screened against the inclusion criteria and data will be extracted and critically appraised for methodological quality by 2 independent reviewers using JBI tools. Confidence in the final synthesized findings will be assessed using the ConQual approach.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023453814.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1362-1370"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This review aims to synthesize the experiences of informal caregivers of people with dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Introduction: Globally, the burden of dementia is increasing disproportionately in LMICs. Informal caregivers play a vital role and face multiple challenges in LMICs, even though they also often lack the awareness and skills to provide adequate care for people living with dementia. Many LMICs have limited resources and caregivers lack support services. Understanding their experiences and perceptions may improve interventions, helping caregivers to better support those living with dementia.

Inclusion criteria: Studies from all settings in LMICs will be considered. Qualitative data from qualitative or mixed methods studies that explore caregivers' experiences and perceptions will be included in this review. Participants are informal caregivers of people diagnosed with dementia at any stage, regardless of age, gender, or their relationship with people living with dementia.

Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for a qualitative systematic reviews, with meta-aggregation as the synthesis method. The review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A 3-step search strategy will be used to locate published and unpublished studies in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, AgeLine, LILACS, African Index Medicus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Open Dissertations, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar. There will be no date or language limitations. All studies will be screened against the inclusion criteria and data will be extracted and critically appraised for methodological quality by 2 independent reviewers using JBI tools. Confidence in the final synthesized findings will be assessed using the ConQual approach.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023453814.

低收入和中等收入国家痴呆症患者非正规护理人员的经历:系统性审查协议。
目的本综述旨在总结中低收入国家(LMICs)痴呆症患者非正规照顾者的经验:在全球范围内,痴呆症给低收入和中等收入国家造成的负担与日俱增。非正规照护者在低收入和中等收入国家发挥着重要作用,同时也面临着多重挑战。照护者往往缺乏为痴呆症患者提供适当照护的意识和技能。许多低收入和中等收入国家的资源有限,护理者缺乏支持服务。了解他们的经历和看法可以改进干预措施,帮助护理人员更好地为痴呆症患者提供支持:将考虑来自低收入和中等收入国家所有环境的研究。本综述将包括来自定性或混合方法研究的定性数据,这些数据将探讨照护者的经验和看法。参与者为任何阶段被诊断为痴呆症患者的非正式照护者,无论其年龄、性别或与痴呆症患者的关系如何:本综述将遵循 JBI 的定性系统综述方法,以元聚合作为综合方法。本综述将按照《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)指南进行报告。将采用三步检索策略,在 MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO、AgeLine、LILACS、African Index Medicus、ProQuest Dissertations and Theses、Open Dissertations、Web of Science Core Collection 和 Google Scholar 中查找已发表和未发表的研究。没有日期或语言限制。所有研究都将根据纳入标准进行筛选,数据将由两名独立审稿人使用 JBI 工具提取并严格评估方法学质量。将使用 ConQual 方法对最终综合结果的可信度进行评估:综述注册号:PREMCORD42023453814。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信