The value of toxicological analysis in acute poisoning patients with uncertain exposure histories: a retrospective and descriptive study from an institute of poisoning.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Qifang Shi, Gen Ba, Zhenyu Xia, Zhengsheng Mao, Hao Sun, Jinsong Zhang
{"title":"The value of toxicological analysis in acute poisoning patients with uncertain exposure histories: a retrospective and descriptive study from an institute of poisoning.","authors":"Qifang Shi, Gen Ba, Zhenyu Xia, Zhengsheng Mao, Hao Sun, Jinsong Zhang","doi":"10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In clinical practice, some patients might not be able or unwilling to provide a thorough history of medication and poison exposure. The aim of this study was to use toxicological analysis to examine the clinical characteristics of patients with acute poisoning whose exposure history was uncertain from a toxicological analysis perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective and descriptive study from an institute of poisoning. Patient registration information and test reports spanning the period from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2022, were obtained. Patients with uncertain exposure histories and who underwent toxicological analysis were included. Clinical manifestations and categories of toxics were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 195 patients with positive toxicological analysis results, the main causes of uncertain exposure history was disturbance of consciousness (62.6%), unawareness (23.6%) and unwillingness or lack of cooperation (13.8%). The predominant clinical manifestations were disturbed consciousness (62.6%), followed by vomiting and nausea (14.4%) and liver function abnormalities (8.7%). A comparison of clinical manifestations between patients with positive and negative (<i>n</i>=99) toxicological analyses results revealed significantly different proportions of disturbances in consciousness (63% vs. 21%), dizziness (1.5% vs. 5.1%), multi-organ failure (1.5% vs. 7.1%), and local pain (0 vs 4%). The main categories of substances involved were psychiatric medications (23.1%), sedatives (20.5%), insecticides (13.8%), and herbicides (12.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical manifestations of acute poisoning in patients with an uncertain exposure history are diverse and nonspecific, and toxicological analysis plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of such patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23685,"journal":{"name":"World journal of emergency medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10925527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In clinical practice, some patients might not be able or unwilling to provide a thorough history of medication and poison exposure. The aim of this study was to use toxicological analysis to examine the clinical characteristics of patients with acute poisoning whose exposure history was uncertain from a toxicological analysis perspective.

Methods: This was a retrospective and descriptive study from an institute of poisoning. Patient registration information and test reports spanning the period from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2022, were obtained. Patients with uncertain exposure histories and who underwent toxicological analysis were included. Clinical manifestations and categories of toxics were analyzed.

Results: Among the 195 patients with positive toxicological analysis results, the main causes of uncertain exposure history was disturbance of consciousness (62.6%), unawareness (23.6%) and unwillingness or lack of cooperation (13.8%). The predominant clinical manifestations were disturbed consciousness (62.6%), followed by vomiting and nausea (14.4%) and liver function abnormalities (8.7%). A comparison of clinical manifestations between patients with positive and negative (n=99) toxicological analyses results revealed significantly different proportions of disturbances in consciousness (63% vs. 21%), dizziness (1.5% vs. 5.1%), multi-organ failure (1.5% vs. 7.1%), and local pain (0 vs 4%). The main categories of substances involved were psychiatric medications (23.1%), sedatives (20.5%), insecticides (13.8%), and herbicides (12.8%).

Conclusion: The clinical manifestations of acute poisoning in patients with an uncertain exposure history are diverse and nonspecific, and toxicological analysis plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of such patients.

对接触史不确定的急性中毒患者进行毒理学分析的价值:一项来自中毒研究所的回顾性和描述性研究。
背景:在临床实践中,一些患者可能无法或不愿提供详尽的用药史和毒物接触史。本研究旨在利用毒理学分析方法,从毒理学分析的角度研究接触史不确定的急性中毒患者的临床特征:这是一项来自中毒研究所的回顾性和描述性研究。研究获取了 2020 年 4 月 1 日至 2022 年 3 月 31 日期间的患者登记信息和检验报告。研究纳入了接触史不确定并接受毒理学分析的患者。对临床表现和毒物类别进行了分析:在 195 名毒理学分析结果呈阳性的患者中,暴露史不确定的主要原因是意识障碍(62.6%)、不了解(23.6%)和不愿意或不合作(13.8%)。主要的临床表现是意识障碍(62.6%),其次是呕吐和恶心(14.4%)以及肝功能异常(8.7%)。对毒理学分析结果呈阳性和阴性(n=99)的患者的临床表现进行比较后发现,意识障碍(63% vs. 21%)、头晕(1.5% vs. 5.1%)、多器官功能衰竭(1.5% vs. 7.1%)和局部疼痛(0 vs. 4%)的比例明显不同。涉及的主要物质类别为精神科药物(23.1%)、镇静剂(20.5%)、杀虫剂(13.8%)和除草剂(12.8%):结论:接触史不明确的急性中毒患者的临床表现多种多样且无特异性,毒理学分析在此类患者的诊断和鉴别诊断中起着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
671
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical, clinical and bioengineering studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of emergency medicine, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, acute injury, out-of-hospital emergency medical service, intensive care, injury and disease prevention, disaster management, healthy policy and ethics, toxicology, and sudden illness, including cardiology, internal medicine, anesthesiology, orthopedics, and trauma care, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review questions, and more. Editorials and communications to the editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信