Acute Pain Services and pain-related patient-reported outcomes in Hungarian hospitals.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Orsolya Lovasi, Péter Gaál, Krisztián Frank, Judit Lám
{"title":"Acute Pain Services and pain-related patient-reported outcomes in Hungarian hospitals.","authors":"Orsolya Lovasi, Péter Gaál, Krisztián Frank, Judit Lám","doi":"10.1186/s13741-024-00373-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pain management is an important part of surgical care, where Acute Pain Service offers added value in terms of patient outcomes and costs. The technology, however, has hardly been adopted in Hungary, with only two hospitals operating Acute Pain Service and whose performance has not been evaluated yet. This research compared pain management outcomes of surgical, orthopedic, and traumatology patients in Hungarian hospitals with and without Acute Pain Service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 348 patients, 120 in the APS group and 228 in the control group, whose experience was surveyed with an adapted version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire. The questionnaire covered pain intensity, pain interference with physical and emotional functions, side effects, patient satisfaction, information received, and participation in treatment decisions. The differences were analyzed by Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The APS group showed better results with lower pain intensity scores regarding worst postoperative pain (χ<sup>2</sup> = 18.919, p = 0.0043). They reported less pain interference with activities in bed (χ<sup>2</sup> = 21.978, p = 0.0006) and out of bed (χ<sup>2</sup> = 14.341, p = 0.0129). Furthermore, patients in the APS group experienced fewer pain-management-related side effects, like nausea (χ<sup>2</sup> = 15.240, p = 0.0101), drowsiness (χ<sup>2</sup> = 26.965, p = 0.0001), and dizziness (χ<sup>2</sup> = 13.980, p = 0.0124). However, patient information (χ<sup>2</sup> = 3.480, p = 0.0945) and patient satisfaction (χ<sup>2</sup> = 5.781, p = 0.2127) did not differ significantly between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings confirm earlier international evidence on the benefits of Acute Pain Service in postoperative pain management and support the wider adoption of the technology in Hungarian hospitals. Nevertheless, close attention should be paid to patient information and involvement as better outcomes alone do not necessarily increase patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10935800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00373-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain management is an important part of surgical care, where Acute Pain Service offers added value in terms of patient outcomes and costs. The technology, however, has hardly been adopted in Hungary, with only two hospitals operating Acute Pain Service and whose performance has not been evaluated yet. This research compared pain management outcomes of surgical, orthopedic, and traumatology patients in Hungarian hospitals with and without Acute Pain Service.

Methods: We recruited 348 patients, 120 in the APS group and 228 in the control group, whose experience was surveyed with an adapted version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire. The questionnaire covered pain intensity, pain interference with physical and emotional functions, side effects, patient satisfaction, information received, and participation in treatment decisions. The differences were analyzed by Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: The APS group showed better results with lower pain intensity scores regarding worst postoperative pain (χ2 = 18.919, p = 0.0043). They reported less pain interference with activities in bed (χ2 = 21.978, p = 0.0006) and out of bed (χ2 = 14.341, p = 0.0129). Furthermore, patients in the APS group experienced fewer pain-management-related side effects, like nausea (χ2 = 15.240, p = 0.0101), drowsiness (χ2 = 26.965, p = 0.0001), and dizziness (χ2 = 13.980, p = 0.0124). However, patient information (χ2 = 3.480, p = 0.0945) and patient satisfaction (χ2 = 5.781, p = 0.2127) did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusions: Our findings confirm earlier international evidence on the benefits of Acute Pain Service in postoperative pain management and support the wider adoption of the technology in Hungarian hospitals. Nevertheless, close attention should be paid to patient information and involvement as better outcomes alone do not necessarily increase patient satisfaction.

匈牙利医院的急性疼痛服务和与疼痛相关的患者报告结果。
背景:术后疼痛管理是外科护理的重要组成部分,急性疼痛服务可为患者的治疗效果和成本带来附加值。然而,这项技术在匈牙利几乎没有得到采用,只有两家医院开展了急性疼痛服务,而且尚未对其绩效进行评估。这项研究比较了匈牙利医院中开设和未开设急性疼痛服务的外科、骨科和创伤科患者的疼痛治疗效果:我们招募了 348 名患者,其中 APS 组 120 人,对照组 228 人,使用改编版的美国疼痛学会患者结果问卷调查他们的经历。问卷内容包括疼痛强度、疼痛对身体和情绪功能的干扰、副作用、患者满意度、获得的信息以及参与治疗决策的情况。差异通过费雪精确检验和曼-惠特尼U检验进行分析:结果:APS 组效果更好,术后最严重疼痛的疼痛强度评分更低(χ2 = 18.919,P = 0.0043)。他们在床上活动(χ2 = 21.978,p = 0.0006)和下床活动(χ2 = 14.341,p = 0.0129)时受到的疼痛干扰较少。此外,APS 组患者经历的疼痛治疗相关副作用较少,如恶心(χ2 = 15.240,P = 0.0101)、嗜睡(χ2 = 26.965,P = 0.0001)和头晕(χ2 = 13.980,P = 0.0124)。然而,患者信息(χ2 = 3.480,p = 0.0945)和患者满意度(χ2 = 5.781,p = 0.2127)在两组之间没有显著差异:我们的研究结果证实了早前国际上关于急性疼痛服务在术后疼痛管理中的益处的证据,并支持匈牙利医院更广泛地采用该技术。然而,应密切关注患者的信息和参与,因为仅有更好的结果并不一定能提高患者的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信