Complications of Implanted Vagus Nerve Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cerebrovascular Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1159/000536362
Roshini Kalagara, Susmita Chennareddy, Emma Reford, Abhiraj D Bhimani, Daniel D Cummins, Margaret H Downes, Jenna M Tosto, Joshua B Bederson, Mocco, David Putrino, Christopher P Kellner, Fedor Panov
{"title":"Complications of Implanted Vagus Nerve Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Roshini Kalagara, Susmita Chennareddy, Emma Reford, Abhiraj D Bhimani, Daniel D Cummins, Margaret H Downes, Jenna M Tosto, Joshua B Bederson, Mocco, David Putrino, Christopher P Kellner, Fedor Panov","doi":"10.1159/000536362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has emerged as a promising tool in ischemic stroke rehabilitation. However, there has been no systematic review summarizing its adverse effects, critical information for patients and providers when obtaining informed consent for this novel treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis reports the adverse effects of VNS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to identify common complications after VNS therapy. The search was executed in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE. All prospective, randomized controlled trials using implanted VNS therapy in adult patients were eligible for inclusion. Case studies and studies lacking complete complication reports were excluded. Extracted data included technology name, location of implantation, follow-up duration, purpose of VNS, and adverse event rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After title-and-abstract screening of 4,933 studies, 21 were selected for final inclusion. Across these studies, 1,474 patients received VNS implantation. VNS was used as a potential therapy for epilepsy (9), depression (8), anxiety (1), ischemic stroke (1), chronic heart failure (1), and fibromyalgia (1). The 5 most common post-implant adverse events were voice alteration/hoarseness (n = 671, 45.5%), paresthesia (n = 233, 15.8%), cough (n = 221, 15.0%), dyspnea (n = 211, 14.3%), and pain (n = 170, 11.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complications from VNS are mild and transient, with reduction in severity and number of adverse events with increasing follow-up time. In prior studies, VNS has served as treatment option in several instances of treatment-resistant conditions, such as epilepsy and psychiatric conditions, and its use in stroke recovery and rehabilitation should continue to be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":9683,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"112-120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536362","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has emerged as a promising tool in ischemic stroke rehabilitation. However, there has been no systematic review summarizing its adverse effects, critical information for patients and providers when obtaining informed consent for this novel treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis reports the adverse effects of VNS.

Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to identify common complications after VNS therapy. The search was executed in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE. All prospective, randomized controlled trials using implanted VNS therapy in adult patients were eligible for inclusion. Case studies and studies lacking complete complication reports were excluded. Extracted data included technology name, location of implantation, follow-up duration, purpose of VNS, and adverse event rates.

Results: After title-and-abstract screening of 4,933 studies, 21 were selected for final inclusion. Across these studies, 1,474 patients received VNS implantation. VNS was used as a potential therapy for epilepsy (9), depression (8), anxiety (1), ischemic stroke (1), chronic heart failure (1), and fibromyalgia (1). The 5 most common post-implant adverse events were voice alteration/hoarseness (n = 671, 45.5%), paresthesia (n = 233, 15.8%), cough (n = 221, 15.0%), dyspnea (n = 211, 14.3%), and pain (n = 170, 11.5%).

Conclusions: Complications from VNS are mild and transient, with reduction in severity and number of adverse events with increasing follow-up time. In prior studies, VNS has served as treatment option in several instances of treatment-resistant conditions, such as epilepsy and psychiatric conditions, and its use in stroke recovery and rehabilitation should continue to be explored.

植入迷走神经刺激的并发症:系统回顾与元分析》。
简介迷走神经刺激(VNS)已成为缺血性脑卒中康复治疗中一种前景广阔的工具。然而,目前还没有系统性综述对其不良反应进行总结,而这些不良反应对于患者和医疗服务提供者在获得这种新型治疗方法的知情同意时至关重要。本系统综述和荟萃分析报告了 VNS 的不良反应:方法:根据 PRISMA 指南进行了系统回顾,以确定 VNS 治疗后的常见并发症。搜索范围包括Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Embase 和 Ovid MEDLINE。所有对成年患者进行植入式 VNS 治疗的前瞻性随机对照试验均符合纳入条件。病例研究和缺乏完整并发症报告的研究被排除在外。提取的数据包括技术名称、植入地点、随访时间、VNS 的目的以及不良事件发生率:结果:在对 4933 项研究的标题和摘要进行筛选后,最终选出 21 项纳入研究。在这些研究中,有 1474 名患者接受了 VNS 植入。VNS 被用作治疗癫痫(9 例)、抑郁症(8 例)、焦虑症(1 例)、缺血性中风(1 例)、慢性心力衰竭(1 例)和纤维肌痛(1 例)的潜在疗法。植入后最常见的5种不良反应是声音改变/嘶哑(n=671,45.5%)、麻痹(n=233,15.8%)、咳嗽(n=221,15.0%)、呼吸困难(n=211,14.3%)和疼痛(n=170,11.5%):VNS引起的并发症是轻微和短暂的,随着随访时间的延长,并发症的严重程度和数量都会减少。在之前的研究中,VNS 已成为癫痫和精神疾病等多种耐药性疾病的治疗选择,其在中风恢复和康复中的应用应继续探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Cerebrovascular Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: A rapidly-growing field, stroke and cerebrovascular research is unique in that it involves a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. ''Cerebrovascular Diseases'' is an international forum which meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues, dealing with all aspects of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. It contains original contributions, reviews of selected topics and clinical investigative studies, recent meeting reports and work-in-progress as well as discussions on controversial issues. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears if directly relevant to clinical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信