Association between corneal hysteresis and glaucoma in a Japanese population: the Hisayama Study.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kohta Fujiwara, Emi Ueda, Jun Hata, Satoko Nakano, Sawako Hashimoto, Shun Nakamura, Yusuke Murakami, Toshiaki Kubota, Takeshi Yoshitomi, Toshiharu Ninomiya, Koh-Hei Sonoda
{"title":"Association between corneal hysteresis and glaucoma in a Japanese population: the Hisayama Study.","authors":"Kohta Fujiwara, Emi Ueda, Jun Hata, Satoko Nakano, Sawako Hashimoto, Shun Nakamura, Yusuke Murakami, Toshiaki Kubota, Takeshi Yoshitomi, Toshiharu Ninomiya, Koh-Hei Sonoda","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2023-323987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the association between corneal hysteresis and the presence of glaucoma and its subtypes in a general Japanese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed the data of 2338 Japanese community-dwellers aged ≥40 years (1059 men, 1279 women) who underwent an eye examination in 2018 as part of the population-based, cross-sectional Hisayama Study. Participants were divided into quartile levels of corneal hysteresis, which had been measured with an ocular response analyzer. Glaucoma was defined based on the International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology criteria. We conducted a logistic regression analysis to determine the ORs and their 95% CIs for the presence of outcomes according to the corneal hysteresis quartiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Glaucoma was diagnosed in 154 participants: primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), n=115; primary angle-closure glaucoma, n=17; exfoliation glaucoma, n=21 and secondary glaucoma without exfoliation glaucoma, n=1. After adjustment for confounders, the OR for prevalent glaucoma was significantly increased in the participants in the first corneal-hysteresis quartile compared with those in the fourth quartile (OR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.03 to 3.17). Regarding glaucoma subtypes, the first-quartile participants had significantly greater likelihoods of the presence of POAG (OR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.61) and exfoliation glaucoma (OR: 6.49; 95% CI: 1.44 to 29.30) compared with those in the third and fourth quartiles after adjustment for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results demonstrated a significant inverse association between corneal hysteresis and the likelihood of glaucoma, suggesting that the measurement of corneal hysteresis would provide useful information for elucidating the aetiology of glaucoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2023-323987","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the association between corneal hysteresis and the presence of glaucoma and its subtypes in a general Japanese population.

Methods: We analysed the data of 2338 Japanese community-dwellers aged ≥40 years (1059 men, 1279 women) who underwent an eye examination in 2018 as part of the population-based, cross-sectional Hisayama Study. Participants were divided into quartile levels of corneal hysteresis, which had been measured with an ocular response analyzer. Glaucoma was defined based on the International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology criteria. We conducted a logistic regression analysis to determine the ORs and their 95% CIs for the presence of outcomes according to the corneal hysteresis quartiles.

Results: Glaucoma was diagnosed in 154 participants: primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), n=115; primary angle-closure glaucoma, n=17; exfoliation glaucoma, n=21 and secondary glaucoma without exfoliation glaucoma, n=1. After adjustment for confounders, the OR for prevalent glaucoma was significantly increased in the participants in the first corneal-hysteresis quartile compared with those in the fourth quartile (OR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.03 to 3.17). Regarding glaucoma subtypes, the first-quartile participants had significantly greater likelihoods of the presence of POAG (OR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.61) and exfoliation glaucoma (OR: 6.49; 95% CI: 1.44 to 29.30) compared with those in the third and fourth quartiles after adjustment for potential confounders.

Conclusions: These results demonstrated a significant inverse association between corneal hysteresis and the likelihood of glaucoma, suggesting that the measurement of corneal hysteresis would provide useful information for elucidating the aetiology of glaucoma.

日本人角膜滞后与青光眼之间的关系:久山研究。
目的:研究日本普通人群中角膜滞后与青光眼及其亚型之间的关联:我们分析了2338名年龄≥40岁的日本社区居民(男性1059人,女性1279人)的数据,他们在2018年接受了眼科检查,这是基于人群的横断面久山研究的一部分。参试者的角膜滞后被分为四分位水平,角膜滞后是通过眼部反应分析仪测量的。青光眼的定义基于国际地理与流行病学眼科学会的标准。我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以确定根据角膜滞后四分位数得出的结果的ORs及其95% CI:154名参与者被诊断为青光眼:原发性开角型青光眼(POAG),115人;原发性闭角型青光眼,17人;剥脱性青光眼,21人;继发性青光眼(无剥脱性青光眼),1人。在对混杂因素进行调整后,角膜滞后第一四分位数的参与者与第四四分位数的参与者相比,青光眼发病率明显增加(OR:1.80;95% CI:1.03 至 3.17)。在青光眼亚型方面,经调整潜在的混杂因素后,第一四分位数参与者患 POAG(OR:1.63;95% CI:1.02 至 2.61)和剥脱性青光眼(OR:6.49;95% CI:1.44 至 29.30)的可能性明显高于第三和第四四分位数参与者:这些结果表明,角膜滞后与患青光眼的可能性之间存在明显的反比关系,这表明测量角膜滞后可为阐明青光眼的病因提供有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信