Efficacy of preexposure prophylaxis with monoclonal-antibody tixagevimab-cilgavimab against emerging SARS-CoV-2 resistant variants in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Ohad Benjamini, Tamar Tadmor, Abraham Avigdor, Rotem Gershon, Limor Kliker, Florin Fares, Nofar Atari, Ilana Laevsky, Bayan Abd Elkader, Tammy Hod, Orit Golan-Shany, Michal Mandelboim, Galia Rahav
{"title":"Efficacy of preexposure prophylaxis with monoclonal-antibody tixagevimab-cilgavimab against emerging SARS-CoV-2 resistant variants in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.","authors":"Ohad Benjamini, Tamar Tadmor, Abraham Avigdor, Rotem Gershon, Limor Kliker, Florin Fares, Nofar Atari, Ilana Laevsky, Bayan Abd Elkader, Tammy Hod, Orit Golan-Shany, Michal Mandelboim, Galia Rahav","doi":"10.1159/000537690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Pre exposure prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were developed in addition to COVID19 vaccine for immunocompromised and those with insufficient immune response, among them patients with CLL. Omicron variant and its sublineages evolved mutations that escape mAbs neutralizing effect, yet the extent of which was not studied. Methods We evaluated anti-spike titters and neutralization activity of COVID-19 wild type (WT) , Delta , Omicron, BA2, BA4 and BA5 before and after tixagevimab-cilgavimab (TGM/CGM) dose of 150/150mg or 300/300mg in patients with CLL. Results 70 patients were tested 2 weeks before and 4 weeks after receiving TGM/CGM mAbs. After TGM/CGM anti-spike ab level increased 170 folds from 13.6 BAU/ml (IQR, 0.4-288) to 2328 BAU/ml (IQR, 1681-3500). Neutralization activity increased in all variants, and was 176 folds higher in WT and 55 folds higher in Delta compared to 10 folds higher in Omicron and its sublineages (BA2 x11, BA4 x4 , BA5 x18). Over follow-up period of 3 months, 20 patients (29%) with CLL acquired COVID-19 infection, all recovered uneventfully. In a multivariate analysis anti-spike antibody titer was found a significant predictor for post TGM/CGM COVID19 infection. Conclusion Efficacy of preexposure prophylaxis with TGM/CGM in patients with CLL is significantly reduced in era of Omicron and its sublineages BA2, BA4 and BA5.</p>","PeriodicalId":6981,"journal":{"name":"Acta Haematologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537690","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Pre exposure prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were developed in addition to COVID19 vaccine for immunocompromised and those with insufficient immune response, among them patients with CLL. Omicron variant and its sublineages evolved mutations that escape mAbs neutralizing effect, yet the extent of which was not studied. Methods We evaluated anti-spike titters and neutralization activity of COVID-19 wild type (WT) , Delta , Omicron, BA2, BA4 and BA5 before and after tixagevimab-cilgavimab (TGM/CGM) dose of 150/150mg or 300/300mg in patients with CLL. Results 70 patients were tested 2 weeks before and 4 weeks after receiving TGM/CGM mAbs. After TGM/CGM anti-spike ab level increased 170 folds from 13.6 BAU/ml (IQR, 0.4-288) to 2328 BAU/ml (IQR, 1681-3500). Neutralization activity increased in all variants, and was 176 folds higher in WT and 55 folds higher in Delta compared to 10 folds higher in Omicron and its sublineages (BA2 x11, BA4 x4 , BA5 x18). Over follow-up period of 3 months, 20 patients (29%) with CLL acquired COVID-19 infection, all recovered uneventfully. In a multivariate analysis anti-spike antibody titer was found a significant predictor for post TGM/CGM COVID19 infection. Conclusion Efficacy of preexposure prophylaxis with TGM/CGM in patients with CLL is significantly reduced in era of Omicron and its sublineages BA2, BA4 and BA5.

使用单克隆抗体 tixagevimab-cilgavimab 对慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者中新出现的 SARS-CoV-2 耐药变体进行暴露前预防的疗效。
导言:除了 COVID19 疫苗外,还开发了单克隆抗体(mAbs)暴露前预防疗法,用于免疫功能低下和免疫反应不足的人群,其中包括 CLL 患者。Omicron 变体及其亚系发生了突变,从而逃避了 mAbs 的中和作用,但这种突变的程度尚未得到研究。方法 我们在 CLL 患者中评估了 COVID-19 野生型(WT)、Delta、Omicron、BA2、BA4 和 BA5 在服用替沙吉单抗-西格维单抗(TGM/CGM)150/150 毫克或 300/300 毫克剂量前后的抗尖峰抗体和中和活性。结果 70 名患者在接受 TGM/CGM mAbs 之前 2 周和之后 4 周接受了检测。接受 TGM/CGM 后,抗尖峰抗体水平从 13.6 BAU/ml(IQR,0.4-288)增加到 2328 BAU/ml(IQR,1681-3500),增加了 170 倍。所有变异株的中和活性都有所提高,WT 变异株的中和活性提高了 176 倍,Delta 变异株的中和活性提高了 55 倍,而 Omicron 及其亚变异株(BA2 x11、BA4 x4、BA5 x18)的中和活性提高了 10 倍。在 3 个月的随访期间,20 名 CLL 患者(29%)感染了 COVID-19,但都顺利康复。多变量分析发现,抗尖峰抗体滴度是预测 TGM/CGM 后 COVID19 感染的重要因素。结论 在 Omicron 及其子系 BA2、BA4 和 BA5 时代,CLL 患者使用 TGM/CGM 进行暴露前预防的效果明显降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Haematologica
Acta Haematologica 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Acta Haematologica'' is a well-established and internationally recognized clinically-oriented journal featuring balanced, wide-ranging coverage of current hematology research. A wealth of information on such problems as anemia, leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, hereditary disorders, blood coagulation, growth factors, hematopoiesis and differentiation is contained in first-rate basic and clinical papers some of which are accompanied by editorial comments by eminent experts. These are supplemented by short state-of-the-art communications, reviews and correspondence as well as occasional special issues devoted to ‘hot topics’ in hematology. These will keep the practicing hematologist well informed of the new developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信