Development and validation of the Autonomy Scale Amsterdam

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jessy Bergamin , Monja Hoven , Ruth J. van Holst , Claudi L. Bockting , Damiaan Denys , Barbara Nevicka , Judy Luigjes
{"title":"Development and validation of the Autonomy Scale Amsterdam","authors":"Jessy Bergamin ,&nbsp;Monja Hoven ,&nbsp;Ruth J. van Holst ,&nbsp;Claudi L. Bockting ,&nbsp;Damiaan Denys ,&nbsp;Barbara Nevicka ,&nbsp;Judy Luigjes","doi":"10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper describes the development and validation of the Autonomy Scale Amsterdam (ASA). We propose that a new measure of autonomy is needed and, as such, we developed and validated an autonomy scale relevant for psychiatry. Based on literature, an expert meeting and three samples of the general population (<em>N</em> = 298, <em>N</em> = 207, <em>N</em> = 309) we provide evidence (a) that supports a 6-factor structure model as a better fit than alternative models with a high reliability to capture the concept of autonomy consisting of: Self-integration, Engagement with life, Goal-directedness, Self-control, External constraints and Social support, (b) for the scale's convergent and discriminant validity with constructs in autonomy's nomological network and (c) for the scale's criterion validity with well-established well-being outcomes, and (d) that the measure is not redundant with a prior measure of autonomy, the autonomy-connectedness scale, and demonstrates incremental validity in the prediction of mental health over and above an existing measure of autonomy. Taken together, the results suggest that the ASA is a useful scale that shows positive evidence of psychometric quality to measure autonomy in a sample of the general population (total <em>N</em> = 856), accounting for a unique predictive value over and above an existing measure of autonomy concerning several mental health outcomes. The ASA can further help our understanding of the role of autonomy in mental disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10554,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive psychiatry","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 152466"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X24000178/pdfft?md5=0bfb6f103c26477b2c888cfdf090096b&pid=1-s2.0-S0010440X24000178-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X24000178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes the development and validation of the Autonomy Scale Amsterdam (ASA). We propose that a new measure of autonomy is needed and, as such, we developed and validated an autonomy scale relevant for psychiatry. Based on literature, an expert meeting and three samples of the general population (N = 298, N = 207, N = 309) we provide evidence (a) that supports a 6-factor structure model as a better fit than alternative models with a high reliability to capture the concept of autonomy consisting of: Self-integration, Engagement with life, Goal-directedness, Self-control, External constraints and Social support, (b) for the scale's convergent and discriminant validity with constructs in autonomy's nomological network and (c) for the scale's criterion validity with well-established well-being outcomes, and (d) that the measure is not redundant with a prior measure of autonomy, the autonomy-connectedness scale, and demonstrates incremental validity in the prediction of mental health over and above an existing measure of autonomy. Taken together, the results suggest that the ASA is a useful scale that shows positive evidence of psychometric quality to measure autonomy in a sample of the general population (total N = 856), accounting for a unique predictive value over and above an existing measure of autonomy concerning several mental health outcomes. The ASA can further help our understanding of the role of autonomy in mental disorders.

阿姆斯特丹自主性量表的开发与验证
本文介绍了阿姆斯特丹自主性量表(ASA)的开发和验证过程。我们提出需要一种新的自主性测量方法,因此,我们开发并验证了一种与精神病学相关的自主性量表。根据文献、专家会议和三个普通人群样本(N = 298、N = 207、N = 309),我们提供了以下证据 (a) 支持 6 因子结构模型,该模型比其他具有高可靠性的模型更适合捕捉自主性概念:自我整合、参与生活、目标导向、自我控制、外部约束和社会支持;(b) 该量表与自主性名义网络中的构念具有收敛性和区分性;(c) 该量表与已确立的幸福感结果具有标准有效性;(d) 该量表与之前的自主性量表(自主性-联系性量表)并无冗余,并且在预测心理健康方面比现有的自主性量表具有更高的有效性。综上所述,研究结果表明 ASA 是一个有用的量表,它在普通人群样本(总人数 = 856)中测量自主性的心理测量质量方面显示出了积极的证据,其独特的预测价值超过了现有的自主性量表对几种心理健康结果的预测价值。ASA 可以进一步帮助我们了解自主性在精神障碍中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comprehensive psychiatry
Comprehensive psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: "Comprehensive Psychiatry" is an open access, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the field of psychiatry and mental health. Its primary mission is to share the latest advancements in knowledge to enhance patient care and deepen the understanding of mental illnesses. The journal is supported by a diverse team of international editors and peer reviewers, ensuring the publication of high-quality research with a strong focus on clinical relevance and the implications for psychopathology. "Comprehensive Psychiatry" encourages authors to present their research in an accessible manner, facilitating engagement with clinicians, policymakers, and the broader public. By embracing an open access policy, the journal aims to maximize the global impact of its content, making it readily available to a wide audience and fostering scientific collaboration and public awareness beyond the traditional academic community. This approach is designed to promote a more inclusive and informed dialogue on mental health, contributing to the overall progress in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信