Feasibility of Immediate Implant Placement in Maxillary First Premolars: Prediction of Implant Locations Using Restorations- A Radiographic Study.

Mohit Kheur, Shifa Kalsekar, Supriya Kheur, Ronald E Jung, Tabrez Lakha
{"title":"Feasibility of Immediate Implant Placement in Maxillary First Premolars: Prediction of Implant Locations Using Restorations- A Radiographic Study.","authors":"Mohit Kheur, Shifa Kalsekar, Supriya Kheur, Ronald E Jung, Tabrez Lakha","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maxillary premolars have a unique anatomical location. This is an CBCT based study where the suitability of maxillary premolars for immediate implant placement (IIP) is evaluated. Based on prosthetically driven treatment treatment planning a simple classification system is put forth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>150 CBCTs of maxillary first premolars were analysed in BlueskyBio software. The topographic position of the tooth was determined by analysing the dimensions of the buccal and lingual cortical plates, the distance between the bucco-lingual plates and the residual bone height from the root apex to the floor of the sinus. Virtual placement of an implant was carried out such that the implant would be positioned 1 mm apical to the buccal bone crest, would engage 3 mm of bone apical to the root apex, and would have a trajectory so that the abutment access was from the central fossa. Four categories were identified and the classification was proposed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was observed that 74% of cases had buccal bone<1mm,26% had buccal bone >1mm. 79% cases had an average distance >3mm between root apex and maxillary sinus, 21% had an average distance of root apex and maxillary sinus <3mm. The categorizations of implant placement were as follows -Type 1- 24%, Type 2- 56.6%, Type 3-43.3%, Type 4- 0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In majority of maxillary 1st premolars an IIP is possible with the implants to be placed in the palatal sockets or the furcation area. In cases were the buccal plate thickness is inadequate, simultaneous grafting should be considered between the implant position and buccal plate.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maxillary premolars have a unique anatomical location. This is an CBCT based study where the suitability of maxillary premolars for immediate implant placement (IIP) is evaluated. Based on prosthetically driven treatment treatment planning a simple classification system is put forth.

Materials and methods: 150 CBCTs of maxillary first premolars were analysed in BlueskyBio software. The topographic position of the tooth was determined by analysing the dimensions of the buccal and lingual cortical plates, the distance between the bucco-lingual plates and the residual bone height from the root apex to the floor of the sinus. Virtual placement of an implant was carried out such that the implant would be positioned 1 mm apical to the buccal bone crest, would engage 3 mm of bone apical to the root apex, and would have a trajectory so that the abutment access was from the central fossa. Four categories were identified and the classification was proposed.

Results: It was observed that 74% of cases had buccal bone<1mm,26% had buccal bone >1mm. 79% cases had an average distance >3mm between root apex and maxillary sinus, 21% had an average distance of root apex and maxillary sinus <3mm. The categorizations of implant placement were as follows -Type 1- 24%, Type 2- 56.6%, Type 3-43.3%, Type 4- 0%.

Conclusions: In majority of maxillary 1st premolars an IIP is possible with the implants to be placed in the palatal sockets or the furcation area. In cases were the buccal plate thickness is inadequate, simultaneous grafting should be considered between the implant position and buccal plate.

上颌第一前磨牙即刻种植的可行性:使用修复体预测种植体位置--一项放射学研究。
背景上颌前磨牙具有独特的解剖位置。这是一项基于 CBCT 的研究,旨在评估上颌前磨牙是否适合即刻种植体植入 (IIP)。材料和方法:使用 BlueskyBio 软件对 150 个上颌第一前磨牙的 CBCT 进行了分析。通过分析颊舌皮质板的尺寸、颊舌皮质板之间的距离以及从根尖到窦底的残余骨高度,确定牙齿的地形位置。虚拟植入种植体时,种植体应位于颊侧骨嵴顶端 1 毫米处,与根尖顶端 3 毫米处的骨质接触,其轨迹应使基台从中心窝进入。结果显示,有 74% 的病例的基台与牙根顶端 3 毫米的牙槽骨接触:结果显示:74%的病例颊骨为 1 毫米。79%的病例根尖与上颌窦之间的平均距离大于3毫米,21%的病例根尖与上颌窦之间的平均距离大于3毫米:在大多数上颌第一前磨牙中,都可以将种植体植入腭窝或窝沟区域,从而实现 IIP。如果颊板厚度不足,则应考虑在种植体位置和颊板之间同时进行移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信